A TEST FOR WEAK FORM EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS: EVIDENCE FROM THE NAIROBI SECURITIES EXCHANGE

MARK WAITA GICHAIYA, DENIS OMARI MHURI, DR. STEPHEN MUCHINA (Ph.D), CYRUS MWANGI MUNYUA, VERONICAH WANJIKU WERU, NICHOLAS KAMAU

Abstract


An efficient stock market should allow security prices to reflect all available information such that stock prices adjust quickly and on average, without bias, to new information. It is expected that no one can detect mispriced securities to make abnormal gains over a period of time and in this way, the market will be deemed to be efficient. Empirical studies have shown mixed results in regards to the efficiency of emerging stock markets rendering the debate on random walk hypothesis to be inconclusive. It is based on this backdrop that this study tested the weak form of market efficiency in the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE).  It tested the null hypothesis that 42 selected stocks severally took a random walk over a 5 –year period. The selection of the stocks was based on continuous trading over the period of the study. The study used monthly average prices from January 2009 to December 2015 which were converted into natural log returns. Data analysis was carried out using serial correlation analysis and runs test analysis aided by Microsoft Excel and SPSS (version 20). The study plotted correlograms at 95% confidence intervals and further computed Ljung Box Q for 1 to 10 lags and Durbin Watson statistics for each selected stock. The study found inconsistency in the findings between runs test and serial correlation in that some of the companies that were found not to be efficient in one test were found to be efficient in another. However, it was generally found that at least 70% of the stocks were efficient in both tests which can be inferred to mean that NSE is largely efficient with some few outliers. This study recommended that a test of the weak form should be further conducted on the NSE utilizing the market indices (NSE 20 Share Index, All Share Index (NASI) and (NSE 25 Share Index) to confirm the above assertion that NSE is largely efficient.

Key Words: Efficient Market Hypothesis, Random Walk Model, Log Returns, Time Series, Technical and Fundamental Analysis

CITATION: Gichaiya, M. W., Mhuri, D. O., Muchina, S.,Munyua, C. M., Weru, V. W., Kamau, N. (2018). A test for weak form efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from the Nairobi Securities Exchange. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 5(4), 2087 - 2123.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Degutis, A., & Novickytė, L. (2014). The efficient market hypothesis: A critical review of literature and methodolgy. EKONOMIKA, 93(2), 7-23.

Elbarghouthi, S., Qasim, A., & Yassin, M. (2012). The Use of Runs Test in Amman Stock Exchange. International Business Research, 5(2), 159-172.

Freund, W. C., Larrain, M., & Pagano, M. S. (1997). Market efficiency before and after the introduction of electronic trading at the Toronto stock exchange. Review of Financial Economics, 6(1), 29-56.

Gichaiya, W., & Ishmail, M. (2014). Evaluation of Financial Distress: A Case Study of UCHUMI Supermarket Ltd. International Journal of Financial Economics, 3(3), 178-183.

Gimba , V. K. (2007). Testing the Weak-form Efficiency Market Hypothesis: Evidence from Nigerial Stock Market. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics, 3(1), 117-136.

Grzyb, J. (2007). Testing Different Forms of Market Efficiency Using the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index. Seminar Paper, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics. Viadrina, Frankfurt: Europa-Universitat.

Gupta, N., & Gedam, A. (2014). Testing of Efficient Market Hypothesis: a study on Indian Stock Market. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(8), 28-38.

Kalsie, A., & Kalra, K. J. (2015). An empirical study on efficient market hypothesis if Indian Capital Markets. Journal of Management Research and Analysis, 2(2), 108-114.

Maronga, E., Nyamosi, D., & Onsando, L. P. (2015). Nairobi Securities Exchange: A review of pricing efficiency after earnings announcement. International journal of arts and commerce, 4(4), 172-186.

Moustafa, M. (2004). Testing the Weak-Form Efficiency of the United Arab Emirates Stock Market. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 9(3), 309-325.

Nayak, S., Misra, B., & Behera, H. (2014). Impact of Data Normalization on Stock Index Forecasting. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 6, 257-269.

Nisar, S., & Hanif, M. (2012). Testing Weak Form of Efficient Market Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence from South-Asia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(4), 414-427.

Okpara, C. G. (2010). Stock market prices and the random walk hypothesis:. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 2(3), 49-57.

Oprean, C. (2012). Testing the financial market informational efficiency in emerging states. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 4(2), 181-190.

Pandey, I. M. (2009). Financial Management (9th ed.). New Dehli: ViKas Publishing House.

Patel, N., Radadia, N., & Dhawan, J. (2012). An Empirical Study on Weak-Form of Market Efficiency of Selected Asian Stock Markets. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2(2), 99-148.

Phiri, A. (2015). Efficient Market Hypothesis in South Africa: Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests. Managing Global Transitions, 13(4), 369-387.

Samitas, A. G. (2004). Testing the Efficient Market Hypothesis in the Greek Secondary Market. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 7(1), 23-38.

Sewell, M. (2012). The Efficient Market Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Statistics and Probability, 1(2), 164-178.

Shiller, I., & Radikoko, I. (2014). Testing Weak-Form Market Efficiency on the TSX. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 30(3), 647-658.

Vulić, B. T. (2010). Testing the Efficient Market Hypothesis and its Critics - Application on the Montenegrin Stock Exchange. Podgorica: University of Montenegro.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i4.1010

Refbacks



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.