INFLUENCE OF SUPPLIER FINANCIAL CAPABILITY AND EVALUATION ON PROCUREMENT PERFORMANCE IN THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF BUNGOMA, KENYA

DOUGLAS WAMALWA KHAEMBA, DR. HESBON N. OTINGA (Ph.D)

Abstract


This study sought to investigate the determinants of procurement performance in the county government of Bungoma, Kenya. The research was based on efficiency theory and resource based view theory. The study adopted descriptive survey design and used structured questionnaires to collect data. The study targeted 113 respondents where Yamame’s formula was applied to get a sample size of 88 respondents. The study instruments were piloted on 10 senior management officers in the county government of Busia, which neighbors Bungoma County, the study area, where content validity was used to ensure validity while cronbachs alpha was used to check instrument reliability. Descriptive statistics summarized data into meaningful forms while for variable relationships, inferential statistics was computed using SPSS 23. All analyzed data was presented in form of tables and graphs. A total of 81 out of 88 respondents returned completely filled questionnaires indicating a response rate of 92.05% which good for generalizability of research findings to a wider population.  From values of unstandardized regression coefficients with standard errors in parenthesis, both independent variables supplier financial capability and supplier evaluation significantly influenced procurement performance in the county government of Bungoma (dependent variable). The study concluded that one; supplier financial capability significantly influences procurement performance in the sense that supplier who had adequate financial resource power would effectively deliver procured goods and services with minimal fail; and two, efficient supplier evaluation is an effective way of ensuring that the county government gets valid and capable suppliers who can effectively deliver procured goods and services. The study recommended that one; there should be a thorough assessment of suppliers before being awarded tenders as this will ensures that qualified suppliers deliver quality goods and services; and two, there should be a thorough assessment of suppliers before being awarded tenders as this will ensures that qualified suppliers deliver quality goods and services.

Key Words: Supplier Financial Capability, Supplier Evaluation, Procurement Performance

CITATION: Khaemba, D. W., & Otinga, H. N. (2019). Influence of supplier financial capability and evaluation on procurement performance in the county government of Bungoma, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 6 (2), 1669 –1682.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adamyan, S. H. (2002). Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (1), 334-342.

Acquaye, O., Mokwena, M., &Kinfack, E. (2011).Protesting for Improved Public Service Delivery in South Africa's Sedibeng District. Social Indicators Research, 119(1), 1-23.

Ameyaw, C., Mensah, S. & Osei-Tutu, E. (2012).Obstacles to the procurement reforms in Ghana.Journal of Public Procurement and Contract Management, 5(7), 224-374.

Anget, L., Yadav, P., Miller, R. & Wilkerson, T. (2005).Strategic contractingpractices to improve procurement in public institutions. Global Health SciencePractise, 2(3), 295-306.

Arsan (2011) Performance Measurement and Metrics: An Analysis of Supplier Evaluation. Internal Journal of Business. 7(8)

Aseka, R (2010) Managing interfaces with suppliers. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 497-506.

Babich, K. &Pettijohn, A. (2004).Purchasing strategies in supply relationships.Supply chain Management. 13(9), 139-165.

Bosire, N Bliss, K, Bentrib V (2011). Kenya: The Big Picture on Health. Center for Strategic & International Studies. Internationa journal of Business Management 8(67-69)

Cebeci, D., Klumpp, M., Politis, S. (2010) Analytical Hierarchy Process in Supplier Evaluation, Journal of Production Economics, Vol 26, Iss 3, 282-299.

Cooper, D. R. & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods (12th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Chung, W.W.C, Yam, A.Y.K. and Chan, M.F.S. (2004). Networked enterprise: A new business model for global sourcing. International Journal of Production Economics.Vol 87, Iss 3, 267-280.

Gadde, L. E., & Hakansson, H. (2001). Supply chain network Strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 195-209.

Handfield, R.B. (2009).Purchasing and supply chain management (2nd Ed). New Jersey: Pearson Publishers

Harry. E. Entwistle, T. & Martin, S. (2006). From Competition to Collaboration in Public Service Delivery: A New Agenda for Research. Public Administration, 83(1),233–242.

Hardy, C. (2011), Bid Evaluation Study for the World Bank , 1, University of Manchestera. Institute of Science and Technology, UK.

Hopp, H and Spearman, B. (2010). The Haves and the Have Nots”: Supply Chain Practices for the New Millenium: Inbound Logistics Journal. 75-114.

Kariuki C &Nzioki N. (2010) The Management of corporate real estate assets in Kenya. FIG Congress, Sydney, Australia.

Kavale, S & Mwikali, R (2012) Factors affecting the selection of optimal suppliers in procurement management, International Journal of Humanities and Social sciences, Vol 2 No. 14.189-193.

Kovacs, G. & Spens, K. (2008). “Abductive reasoning in logistics research”. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , Vol. 35, No. 2, pp.132-144.

Ku, J., Malhotra, T. & Murnighhan, R. (2005). Procurement policy and contracting efficiency. International Economic Review, 34(4), 873.

Lysons, K., & Farrington, B. (2006). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. (7th ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Lyons,.R. (2005). Public Procurement and Contracting In Bangladesh: An Analysis Of The Perceptions Of Civil Servants. Journal of Public Procurement, 7(3), 381-398.

Monczka, R. (2014). Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 553-577.

Moses, M (2009) Critical Analysis of Strategy Implementation on Organization Performance in Service Delivery: Case of Lake Victoria South Water Services Board in Kisumu. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(30), 192-201

Nachtmann, H., & Pohl, E. (2014). The industry’s take on data standards. Materials Management in Health Care, 12–16.

Olson et al. 2005). Developing an effective internal customer’s service ethos: Institute of Public Administration Ireland.

Parkera, D. & Hartley, K. (2003) Transaction costs, relational contracting and public private partnerships: a case study of UK defense. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 9, 97–108

Pauw, S. (2002). The elements of public procurement Contracting practices in Kericho District. Perspectives International Purchasing and Supply Education Research Association Conference. Aldershot, Hampshire, England; Burlington, VT: Gower 45(39),107–108.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

Su, S.I., Chou, A., Hsu, T. and Ho, T. (2014), “A follow-up study of hospital ordering pattern, its impact on ZPT order fulfillment performance and collaboration opportunities”, Technical Report, SCLab, Soochow University, Taipei.

Thai, K. (2001)."Public procurement re-examined", Journal of Public Procurement, 4 (1), 211 212.

Ware, P., & Kynoch, A. (2013). Public Procurement Reform: Impact on Contracting Authorities and Tenderers. Credit Control,34 (3), 13.

Zack, H (2003). “Claimsmanship: Current Perspective.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119 (3): 480-496.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v6i2.1212

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.