RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RURAL ELECTRIFICATION PROJECTS IN NAKURU COUNTY, KENYA

SAMUEL KIBE MBURU, DR. PAUL SANG (Ph.D)

Abstract


Rural electrification is a vital part of a nation's infrastructure in Kenya’s economic plans. It is projected that approximately eighty five percent of the 1.2 billion persons without access to electricity live in the rural areas. It was recognized that there are inconsistencies on the performance of the REP in comparison to the funding being channeled to the same; three key indicates on these were used i.e. electric access rate, reliability and cost of sales all showed dismal performance hence the need to understand the effect of risk management strategies and the implementation of rural electrification project in Naivasha Constituency could not be overstated. Various researchers concurs that the correlation between uncertainty and project failure are elaborately documented, however the same cannot be said on the correlation among the various factors and the successful implementation of projects. Investigations on risk management also reported that despite the high prominence and positive insight on risk management in their establishments, an important gap exists between interest for risk management and resource allocation and staff training. The project explored on transfer risk management strategies and their effect on project implementation of rural electrification projects in Naivasha constituency, Kenya. The study employed descriptive statistic design. Purposive sampling 45 respondents were administered structured questionnaires. The finding of the study indicated that risk transfer which included outsourcing, joint ventures and use of insurance were shown to impact strongly on the impact implementation of REP projects and had not been implemented entirely into rural electrification projects in Naivasha County thus the management should be encourage on their continued applications. The study recommended on improving on risk transfer strategies in order to implement REP. By having one, Joint ventures that supports equity participation for production, technology transfer, managerial contract, and marketing and outsourcing. Two, training project team on quality assurance to improve the project plan to meet the quality standards, and aiming at preventing mistakes in REP projects. Three, introducing new approaches for the determination of risk contingencies and budgeting method.

Key words: Risk Management, Risk Transfer, Rural Electrification

CITATION: Mburu, S. K., & Sang, P. (2019). Risk management strategies and the implementation of rural electrification projects in Nakuru County, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 6 (2), 1979 –1988.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, S., & Markandya, A. (2009). Rural electrification programmes in Kenya: Policy conclusion from a valuation study. Nairobi: Bath Economic Research Papers.

Ayieko, Z. O. (2011). Rural Electrification Programme in Kenya. Dakar: AEI Practitioners Workshop.

Barnes, D. F. (2011). Meeting the Challenge of Rural Electrification in Developing Nations: The Experience of Successful Programs. Energy Sector Management Assistance Program.

Berg, H.-P. (2010). Risk Management: Procedures, Methods and Experiences (Vol. 2). New Jersey: John Wiley.

Besner, C., & Hobbs, B. (2012). The paradox of risk management; a project management practice perspective . International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 230 – 247.

Bhattacharyya, S. C., & Dey, P. K. (2007). Managing risk in a large rural electrification programme in India. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal,, 25(1).

Cook, P. (2011). Infrastructure, rural electrification and development. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15, 304-313.

Darnall, R., & Preston, J. M. (2010). Project Management from Simple to Complex. Flat World Knowledge, Inc.

Hynuk Sanchez, B. R. (2009). Risk management applied to projects, programs, and portfolios. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14 – 35.

Khamaksorn, A. (2016). Project Management Knowledge and Skills for the Construction Industry. International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Sustainable Development (CASD-2016). London.

KPLC. (2013). Distribution Master Plan Report. Nairobi: Brinckerhoff, Parsons.

Kreitner, R. (2011). Organizational Behavior. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Kristensen, V., Aven, T., & Ford, D. (2006). A new perspective on Renn and Klinke’s approach to risk evaluation and management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 421-32.

Myers, M., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research. Information and Organization, 2–26.

Patton, M. (2014). Qualitative evaluation and research method . Oaks.C.A: Sage publishers, Ins.

Pauser, D., Fuente, K., & Djerma, M. (2015). Sustainable Rural Electrification. New York: GSDR 2015 Brief.

PMBoK. (2013). Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (5th ed.). PMI.

PMI. (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.

Potts, M. (2008). Risk Management, chaos theory. Abingdon: Taylor.

Wiese, A. (2007). Rural Electrification in Africa. Abuja: West African Power Industry Convention.

Zerriffi, H. (2008). From açaí to access: distributed electrification in rural Brazil. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 2(1), 90 - 117.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v6i2.1232

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.