INFLUENCE OF PRODUCT DIVERSIFICATION ON THE OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN KAKAMEGA COUNTY, KENYA

VINCENT OMARI ALENGO, BARRACK OKELLO, DR. ABRAHAM MALENYA (Ph.D)

Abstract


The primary purpose of diversification is to allow an organization to grow. Commercial banks in the Kenya are on different stages of strategizing and implementing diversification plans. While formulating new diversification strategies, many firms often fail to consider problems associated with diversification. Therefore, the objective of this study was to establish the influence of product diversification on the operational performance of commercial banks in Kakamega County, Kenya. The study was conducted using descriptive survey design and targeted the management of 26 commercial banks from the region from which a sample size of 93 respondents were drawn using a stratified random sampling method. Questionnaires were used to collect data after pilot testing them in banks in Kisumu County. The questionnaires were also pretested to ensure content validity and also for reliability at the recommended Cronbach alpha of 0.7. The data was analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistical methods. The findings of the study established that diversification of banking products into related products leads to increase in number of customers, multiple markets and enhanced performance of banking firms. The hypothesis test was done at a significant level 0.05. The test results showed that there exists a statistically significant correlation between Product Diversification and operational performance. It was recommended that commercial banks should diversify their products into related products which would lead to an increase in number of customers.

Key Words: Product Diversification, Operational Performance, Commercial Banks 

CITATION: Alengo, V. O., Okello, B., & Malenya, A. (2019). Influence of product diversification on the operational performance of commercial banks in Kakamega County, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 6 (2), 2342 – 2353.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adner R, Ruiz-Aliseda F, Zemsky P (2016) Specialist versus generalist positioning: Demand heterogeneity, technology scalability and endogenous market segmentation. Strategy Science 1: 184-206.

Brendel M, Rudolph C, Schwetzler B (2013) Diversification discount revisited: An application of the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition. SSRN manuscript.

Carney M, Gedajlovic ER, Heugens PP, Van Essen M, Van Oosterhout JH (2011) Business group affiliation, performance, context, and strategy: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal. 54: 437-460.

Doaei M, Shavazipour B (2013) Corporate diversification's effects on efficiency and productivity: Case study of manufacturing firms listed in Bursa Malaysia

Gao W, Chou J (2015) Innovation efficiency, global diversification, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance 30: 278-98.

Hsu CW, Liu HY (2008) Corporate diversification and firm performance: The moderating role of contractual manufacturing model. Asia Pacific Management Review 13: 345-360.

Iacobucci D, Rosa P (2005) Growth, diversification, and business group formation in entrepreneurial firms. Small Business Economics 25: 65-82.

Li H, Zhang Y (2007) The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal 28: 791-804.

Lyandres E, Marchica MT, Michaely R, Mura R (2015) Owners’ portfolio diversification and firm investment: Evidence from private and public firms. SSRN Working Paper.

Purkayastha S, Lahiri S (2016) Do diversified business groups help organizational performance? An industry-wise analysis. International Studies of Management & Organization 46: 24-34.

Salma U, Hussain A (2018) A Comparative Study on Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance across South Asian Countries. J Account Mark 7: 263. DOI: 10.4172/2168-9601.1000263

Seifi A, Moosavi SV, Ardestani E (2012) A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating New Business Opportunities for Corporate Diversification. Journal of Enterprise Transformation 2: 105-129.

Shavazipour B (2013) Ranking efficient DMUs using the ideal point and norms. International Journal of Data Envelopment Analysis 12: 75-83.

Shyu J, Chen YL (2009) Diversification, performance, and the corporate life cycle. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 45: 57-68.

Sissy AM (2015) The effects of revenue diversification and cross border banking on risk and return (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghana).

Van der Stede, W.A. (2011). The effect of corporate diversification and business unit strategy on the presence of slack in business unit budgets, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 14 Issue: 1, pp.30-52, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570110381060

Van Oijen, A., Douma, S. (2000). Diversification strategy and the roles of the centre, Long Range Planning, 33(4).560-78.

Villalonga B. & Amit (2006). Diversification Discount or Premium? New Evidence from BITS Establishment Level Data, Journal of Finance, 59(2)479-502.

Villalonga, B. (2004). Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the Business Information Tracking Series, Journal of Finance, 59, 479-506.

Wheeller, L.T., &Hunger,J.D. (2008). Strategic Management and business policy: concepts and cases, 11th Edition, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

Yasar, Fatih (2010). Competitive Strategies and Fi rm Performance: Case Study on Gaziantep Carpeting Sector. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social SciencesInstitute 7, 309-324.

Young AR (2004) The incidental fortress: The single European market and world trade. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 42: 393-414.

Zhou, G. (2008). Being Naive about Naive Diversification: Can Investment Theory be Consistently Useful? Working paper. July 2008.

Zook, C. (2001). Desperately seeking growth: the virtues of attending to your core, Harvard Management Update, 6(6)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v6i2.1267

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.