ROLE OF JOB DESIGN ON EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT IN PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN KENYA: A CASE OF PRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSITY OF EAST AFRICA

NAOMI W KARIUKI

Abstract


It is commonly acknowledged that human resources are the most important asset in any organization. In a turbulent economic environment characterized by high staff turnover and brain drain human resources practitioners’ major challenge is to find ways of attracting and retaining creative and dedicated staff committed to the organization and to determine which working conditions stimulate employees to give their best, to be engaged, to go beyond what is expected and persist in the face of difficulties. The aim of the study was to establish the role of job design on employee engagement. The target population was 535 employees working at the top management, middle level management and low level management at The Presbyterian University of East Africa. A sample of 84 employees of the target population was considered by use of stratified sampling method. The primary data was collected through the use of questionnaires and secondary data was obtained from published documents such as journals, periodicals, magazines and reports to supplement the primary data. A pilot study was conducted to pretest the validity and reliability of instruments for data collection. The raw information was analyzed to yield qualitative and quantitative data. Quantitative data was analyzed with help of SPSS version 20 and MS excel. The variables were regressed and study findings showed that skill variety, task identity, job design and job feedback significantly and positively influenced employee engagement at The Presbyterian University of East Africa. Job feedback was the most significant factor and had a positive significant relationship at 5% level of significance. This implied that the variables understudy affected employee engagement in Presbyterian University of East Africa and recommends for effective policies and strategies to enhance appropriate job designs for improving employee engagement and performance.

Key Words: Job Design, Employee Engagement


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakker,A.B. (2008). Specific determinants of intrisic work motivation, burnout and turnover intentions:a study among nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing,vol.29(6) , 493-589.

Campion,M.& Thayer,P. (2006). Job design: Approches, outcomes and trade-offs. In Organizational Dynamics,15 (pp. 66-79).

Darrah,C. (2002). "Workforce skills in context: Rhetoric Versus reality. In Work and occupation (pp. 39-45). New York: Free Press.

Day,K.M & Delvin,R.A. (2008). "The payoff to work without pay: Volunteer work and an investment in human capital". Canadian Journal of Economics,vol.31(5) , 1179-1191.

Dwivendi,R.S. (2002). Human Relations and Organization Behaviour,5th Edition. India: Prentice Hall.

Frederick.M. (2006). The work design questionnaire: Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design. Journal of Applied Psychology , 20-39.

Fried,Y.& Ferris,G. (2005). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and Meta-analysis. In Personnel Psychology (pp. 287-322). India: Prentice Hall.

Gardner,D.G,&Cummings,L. (2008). Activation theory and job design: Review and onceptualization. International Journal of Research in Organizational Behaviour,Vol.10 , 81-122.

Gary,J.R. (2004). Motivation in work organizations. Boston: Pearson Education.

GoK. (2009). Sector Performance Standards:Office of the prime minister. Kenya.

Golamzadeh. (2009). Retaining high performance employee through job design. London: McGraw Hill.

Grant,A.M. (2010). Employee without a cause.The motivational effects of social impact in public service. International Public Mnagement Behaviour,vol.31 , 463-479.

Gulem,A. & Burca,G. (2009). Exploring the antecendents of organiazation: The role of job dimension,individual characteristics and job involvement. International Journal of Nursing Management,17(1) , 66-73.

Hackman,J.R. & Oldham,G.R,. (2004). 2002. Development of the job diagnostic survey , 45-55.

Katz,R. & Van,J. (2002). The loci of work satisfaction. In Human relations (pp. 469-486). India: Prentice Hall

Kemboi,A. (2013). Skill variety, feedback and employee performance:Acase of Moi Teaching and Referall Hospital. European Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol.5 , 30-47.

Kothari,C.R. (2008). Research Methodology:Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.

Morgenson,F.P,Delanley-Kinger,K & Hemingway,M.A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability and job-related skill for predicting job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,vol 90(2) , 399-406.

Parsons,E.& Broad,A. (2008). Job motivation and satisfaction: Unpacking the key factors for charity shop manager. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,13(2) , 121-131

Robertson.I & Smith,M. (2003). Motivation and job design: Theory,research and practice. London : Prentice Hall.

Ross,D.L. (2008). "Percieved job characteristics and internal work motivation". Journal of Mnagement Development,24(3) , 253-266.

Rush,H. (2004). Job design for motivation:Experiements in job enlargement and job enrichment . New York: Free Press.

Taylor,F.E. (2000). Principles of scientific managemment. New York: Harper.

Thompson,C.A & Gonca,G. (2006). Relationships among organizational family support,job autonomy,percieved control and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology , 100-118.

Torrington,D & Stephen,T. (2008). Human Resource Management. Edinburg: Person Education Limited.

Ugboro,I.O. (2006). Organizational commitment, Job redesign,Employee empowerment and Intent to quit among survivors of restructuring and downsizing. Journal of Behavioural and Applied Management,7(3) , 232-254.

Vroom,V.M. (2002). Work and motivation. San Fransisco: Bass Inc.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v2i2.132

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.