REPORTING STRUCTURES AND FINANCIAL EFFICIENCY AMONG SELECTED COUNTY GOVERNMENTS

MERCY CHEBASA PSIRMOI, DR. RASHID FWAMBA (Ph.D), DR. BRIAN SINGORO (Ph.D)

Abstract


Internal auditors face several obstacles including limited of independence, limited access to records as well as support and recognition by the management. The importance of internal auditing within the county government is underscored by noted irregularities including records inaccessibility, poor reporting structures and even incompetence of internal auditors within the county government expenditure. Therefore, the focus of this study was to examine the influence of internal audit independence on the financial efficiency of selected county governments.  The study was guided by the specific objectives of; to evaluate the influence of reporting structure on the financial efficiency of selected county governments. The study targeted 423 respondents from the 9 county Audit Committee members of the 47 county governments in Kenya. The researcher sampled 126 respondents from the 14 (30% of the 47 targeted population of counties) which was purposively sampled regionally. Purposive sampling technique was used to get the 14 county governments. The survey involved collecting information by administering questionnaires. Data collected was descriptively analyzed using SPSS.  Results were summarized using tables and presented in form of pie charts, graphs, and bar charts. The means of reporting structures and Financial Efficiency of County Governments were regressed. Findings revealed that the relationship of reporting structures and Financial Efficiency of County Governments was linear, positive and significant. The correlation coefficient (R) of 0.470 implied a relatively weak relationship of reporting structures and Financial Efficiency of County Governments. The coefficient of determination, R-square of 0.221 implied that 22.1% of the variance in Financial Efficiency of County Governments was accounted for by reporting structures with the significance value of p = 0.000 which was less than 0.05. The findings would be of use in policy formulation, industry practice and research.

Key Words: Reporting Structures, Financial efficiency, Internal audit independence 

 CITATION:  Psirmoi, C. M., Fwamba, R., & Singoro, B. (2019). Reporting structures and financial efficiency among selected County Governments. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 6 (4), 78 – 89.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, H., Othman, R., & Jusoff, K. (2009). The effectiveness of internal audit in Malaysian public sector. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 5(9), 53-62.

Alizeban, N. (2014). Threats to auditor independence. The Malaysian Accounting: Journal of Malaysian Institute of Certfied Pulic Accounting, 3(5), 543-599.

Alzeban, A., & Gwilliam, D. (2014). Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: A survey of the Saudi public sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2), 74-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.06.001

Goodwin, J. (2011). Two factors affecting internal audit independence and objectivity: Evidence from Singapore. International Journal of auditing, 107-125.

Institute of Internal Auditors. (2011). Professional internal Auditing standards volume. Standards for the professional practice of internal Auditing. Institute of internal Auditors.

Kothari, C. (2005). Research Methodology, Methods and Techniques. 2nd Revised Ed. New Delhi, India: New Age international publishers.

Mihret, D., & Woldeyohannis, G. (2008). Value-added role of internal audit: An Ethiopian case study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(6), 567-595.

Mugenda and Mugenda. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: Act press.

Sheiv (2010). Auditor independence.The challenges of fact and appearence. Singapore: Acconting Horizons.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v6i4.1373

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.