THE EFFECT OF IMPROVED REVENUE-COLLECTION EFFICIENCY STRATEGY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF WSPS IN KENYA: A CASE NYAHURURU WATER AND SANITATION COMPANY, NYAHURURU, KENYA

JOHN MUCHIRI MURIITHI, PROF. ISAAC OCHIENG’ (Ph.D), DR. PAUL MUOKI NZIOKI (Ph.D)

Abstract


This study analyzed the effect of improved revenue-collection efficiency strategy on the performance of WSPs in Kenya; case of Nyahururu Water and Sanitation Company (NYAHUWASCO), Nyahururu. The study used descriptive survey research design and its target population was the 86-permanent staff of NYAHUWASCO, Nyahururu as at March 2017. A stratified random sampling was adopted in which respondents from different departments were targeted and which gave the sample size of 71 members. A pilot testing of the instruments was done to a selected sample of 6 permanent staff of Nakuru Water and Sanitation Company, to test their validity and reliability. Primary data was collected using questionnaires while secondary data was collected from existing relevant documents. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with the help of Scientific Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) computer program, in order to determine effect of improved revenue-collection efficiency strategy on performance of NYAHUWASCO. The study revealed that practices that improved revenue collection efficiency such as introduction of mobile payment solutions, decreasing bill collection periods, disconnection policy and increase in the number of the billed customers enhanced performance at NYAHUWASCO. The study tested a null hypothesis that stated that, improved revenue-collection efficiency strategy does not have a statistically significant effect on performance of WSPs in Kenya. The inferential statistics found that improved revenue-collection strategy effect on performance of NYAHUWASCO is statistically significant (p<0.01). Therefore the hypothesis was rejected. An increase in improved revenue collection efficiency by one unit was found to increase performance by 0.359 units of NYAHUWASCO performance when all other variables were held constant. The study recommended that the government and management should enhance revenue collection efficiency such as introduction of mobile payment solutions, decreasing bill collection periods, disconnection policy and increase in the number of the billed customers.

Key Words: Revenue Collection, Efficiency

CITATION: Muriithi, J. M., Ochieng, I., & Nzioki, P. M. (2019). The effect of improved revenue-collection efficiency strategy on the performance of WSPS in Kenya; A case Nyahururu Water and Sanitation Company, Nyahururu, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 6 (4), 1335 – 1341.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abubakar, I. R. (2016). Quality Dimensions of Public Water Services in Abuja, Nigeria. Utilities Policy, 38, pp.43-51.

Alinaitwe, H., Apolot, R., & Tindiwensi, D. (2013). Investigation into the Causes of Delays and Cost Overruns in Uganda's Public Sector Construction Projects. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 18(2), pp. 33-47.

Amarjit, S. G., & Nahum, B. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Working Capital Management Efficiency of American Manufacturing Firms. Managerial Finance, 39, pp. 116-132.

Cheng, D. (2013). (In)visible Urban Water Networks: The Politics of Non-payment in Manila‘s Low-income Communities. Environment and Urbanization, 25, page 249.

Foster, V. (2010). Executive Summary Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic Overhauling the Engine of Growth: Infrastructure in Africa. New York: World Bank.

Freeman, R. E., Harris, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

GoK. (2006(a). The National Water Resources Management Strategy (NWRMS) (2006-2008). Nairobi: Government Printer.

Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013, January). Stakeholdre Theroy, Value and Firm Performance. Business Ethics Quarterly 23: 1.

Institute of Economic Affairs. (2007). A Rapid Assessment of Kenya’s Water, Sanitation and Sewerage Framework. Nairobi, Kenya: IEA.

Kate, B., & McKinley, T. (2007). Privatising Basic Utilities in Sub-Saharan Africa: The MDG Impact. Research Brief of the Internatinal Poverty Center.

Mishra, A. A. (2012). Not for free: Revenue Strategies for a New World. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29, pp. 312-313. doi: doi:10.1108/07363761211237407

Morton, K. (2009). Billing modernization: Strengthening customer satisfaction to build a competitive advantage. Journal of insuarence operations.

Mugisha, S. (2013). Applying Incentives to Increase Revenue Water in Urban Systems. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology. AQUA, 62 , pp. 268-278.

Ogendi, G. M., & Ong'oa, I. M. (2009). Water accessibility and water ethics in kenya. santa clara journal international law (7), pp 177.

UNESCO. (2015). Water for a sustainable World. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

US.News. (2017). The Benefits of Mobile Money in Kenya. Retrieved from Best Countries: HTTP://WWW.usnews.com

Water Services Regulatory Board. (2009). Water and Sanitation Coverage. Sub-Sector Issue No 3. : WASREB.

WHO/UNICEF. (2006). Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation terget:the urban and rural challenge of the decade. Geneva: World Health Organization.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v6i4.1469

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.