EFFECT OF ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT ADOPTION ON PERFORMANCE OF PREFERENTIAL PROCUREMENT IN DEVOLVED SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN KENYA

DORIS JEPKEMBOI SITIENEI, DR. ANTHONY OSORO (PhD)

Abstract


This research study explored the effect of e-procurement adoption on performance of preferential procurement in devolved system of government in Kenya. The study specific objectives were the effect of e-sourcing on performance of preferential procurement, the effect of e-tendering on performance of preferential procurement, to determine the effect of e-ordering on performance of the preferential procurement and to establish the effect of e-informing on performance of the preferential procurement in devolved system of government in Kenya. The study was carried out in 5 selected county governments of Kenya out of 47 counties which included Nairobi, Kajiado, Machokos, Murang’a and Kiambu. This study was informed by Transactional Cost Theory, Resource Based Theory, Technology Acceptance Theory and Innovation Diffusion Theory. The target population of the study was 202 respondents from departments of procurement, finance and administration as they dealt directly with procurement processes in five selected County Governments of Kenya. The study adopted a random sampling technique to select sample of 134 respondents. The study employed descriptive survey design and reliable instrument of collecting primary data was administering and picking questionnaires after two weeks for analysis. 134 questionnaires were administered out of which 98 were returned. The quantitative data was analyzed by both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (Mutiple Regression, Pearson correlation and ANOVA) with the aid of SPSS version 24 software. Report findings from the pilot test of 13 respondents conducted revealed that the level of reliability was sufficient for the research study indicating values above 0.7. Findings from the research study showed that E-sourcing, E-tendering, E-ordering and E-informing have significant effect on performance of preferential procurement basing on overall means of 3.41, 3.44, 3.49 and 3.53 respectively. From the survey findings, the study deduced that majority of county governments in Kenya have adhered to the preferential procurement to a high extent and adoption of e-procurement system has enhanced performance of preferential procurement and increased participation of SIGs. It was the recommendation of this research study that there ought to be adoption of the appropriate e-procurement practices by the Government of Kenya in all public institutions to facilitate platforms for procuring entities to engage more with Special Interest Groups to access government procurement opportunities.

Key Words: E-Sourcing, E-Tendering, E-ordering, E-informing

CITATION: Sitienei, D. J., &  Osoro, A. (2021). Effect of electronic procurement adoption on performance of preferential procurement in devolved system of government in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 8 (1), 572 – 584.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aboelmaged, M.G. (2010), E-procurement adoption in a developing country: an empirical integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior, Industrial management and data systems, 110(3), 392-414.

Abouzeedan A. & Busler M. (2002). Electronic procurement and small and medium- sized enterprises management. Research in entrepreneurship and small business, (16th ed.). 2 127–56.

Aguiar Soares-, A. and Reis Palma-Dos-, A. (2008). Why do firms adopt e-procurement systems? Using logistic regression to empirically test a conceptual model, Transactions on engineering management,55(1), 120-133

Arrowsmith, S. (2010). Public procurement basic concepts and the coverage of procurement rules. EU Asia Inter University Network

Babatunde, O., & Emem, I. (2015). The impact of leadership style on employee’s performance in an organization. Public policy and administration research, 5(1), 193-206.

Bailey, Kate, and Mark Francis. (2008). Managing information flows for improved value chain performance. International journal of production economics 111, 2–12.

Barden, M. (2012). Procurement challenges in the South African public sector. Journal of Transport and supply chain management.

Barney, J., & Hesterly, W. (2012). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases (4th ed.).

Barney, J.B. (2001). Firm resources and sustained procurement performance. Journal of Pearson. management, 17(1), 99-120.

Barrett, P. (2010). Balancing accountability and efficiency in a more competitive public sector environment. Australian journal of public administration, 59(3), 58-71.

Barsemoi, H., Mwangagi, P., & Asienyo, B.O. (2014). Factors influencing procurement performance in private sector in kenya. International journal of innovation and applied studies, 9(2),632-641

Baumgartner, Frank R. & Bryan D. Jones. (2002). Agendas and Instability in American Politics, (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Bello, D., Osmonbekov, T., & Gilliad, D. (2002). Adoption of Electronic commerce tools in business procurement; Enhanced buying center structure and processes. Journal of business and industrial marketing, 17, (3).Bhola, H. S. (1995a) Informed Decisions Within a Culture of Information: Updating a Model of Information Development and Evaluation. adult education and development 44, 75–84.

Bhola, H. S. (1995b) The National Literacy Program in Namibia (NLPN): A Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation. Windhoek, Namibia: Government of the Republic of Namibia, Ministry of Basic Education and Culture, The Directorate of Adult Basic Education.

Bhola, H. S. (1998a) Constructivist Capacity Building and Systemic Programme Evaluation: One Discourse, Two Scripts', Evaluation 4,(3), 329–350.

Bhola, H.S. (1990) Evaluating Literacy for Development: Projects, Programs and Campaigns. Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education (now UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Education) in cooperation with German Foundation for Educational Development, Bonn, Germany).

Bhola, H.S., (1995). Informed Decisions Within a Culture of Information: Updating a Model of Information Development and Evaluation, Adult education and development, (44), 75-84.

Biwott, T., Egesah, O., & Ngeywo, J. (2017). Importance of E-tendering in the Sustainability of Constituency Development Fund (CDF) Projects in Kenya. IRA- International journal of management & social sciences, 7(1), 45- 51.

Cagliano, R., Caniato, F. & Spina, G. (2003). E-business strategy: How companies are shaping their supply chain through the Internet, International journal of operations & production management, 23(10)

Caldwell, D., Roehrich, K. & Davies, C. (2009): Procuring complex performance in construction: London Heathrow Terminal 5 and a private finance initiative Hospital. Journal of purchasing and supply management 15(3), pp. 178-186.

Chapman, D. and L. Mahlck. (1993). From Data to Action: Information systems in educational planning. Paris: UNESCO.

Clemons K., Eric & P. Reddi, Sashidhar & C. Row, Michael. (1993). The Impact of Electronic procurement on the Organization of Economic Activity: The “Move to the Middle” Hypothesis. J. of Management Information Systems,10), 9-36.

Constitution of Kenya. (2010). Government Printer, Nairobi, Kenya.Corner ,U. and Prahalad, M (2007) ‘American and European Responses to the Arab Spring: What’s the Big Idea?’ Center for Strategic and International Studies: The Washington Quarterly, 34 (4) 131-145

Creswell, John, W. (2003). Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (Second Edition). SAGE Publications. International Educational and Professional Publisher. Thousand Oaks. London- New Delhi.

Croom, S. (2003) ‘The impact of web-based procurement on the management of operating resources supply’, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36 (1), .4–13




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v8i1.1933

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.