IMPACT OF COVID-19 LOCKDOWN ON FOOD SECURITY IN RWANDA

DR. PIERRE-CELESTIN RWIGEMA (PhD)

Abstract


Globally, COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected all sectors of economies. The crisis has drastically impacted food security. The Supply chains, food and nutrition security, as well as current and future production functions have been negatively impacted by a host of factors related to the COVID- 19 pandemic crisis. Hundreds of millions of people were already suffering from hunger and malnutrition before the virus hit. Unless immediate action is taken, we could see a global food emergency. The purpose of this paper was to contribute on understanding of the resultant impacts that COVID-19 has on food security in Rwanda. The paper focussed on a comprehensive literature review on past global pandemics lockdowns and the impact they had on food security on household livelihoods. Food security is a basic human need and basic requirement for survival in difficult times. In the longer term, the combined effects of COVID-19 itself, as well as corresponding mitigation measures and the emerging global recession could, without large-scale coordinated action, disrupt the functioning of food systems. Such disruption can result in consequences for health and nutrition of a severity and scale unseen for more than half a century. The onset of the COVID-19 crisis in Rwanda led to a total country lockdown on March 2020 that exponentially increased Rwanda’s food security problems. Being a landlocked country, food supply chain distribution networks were severely constrained. The numerous negative impacts of the health crisis are having a compound effect on all facets of food security, including food production, safety and distribution. The lockdown, curfews, closures of markets, restrictions on border crossings and movement limitation measures (while necessary for public health and safety concerns), hamper the functioning of the agricultural sector, and Small to Medium Enterprise (SMEs) that make up the Rwanda supply chain backbone. These restrictions exacerbate food insecurity and nutritional deficits issues across the country affecting all sectors. Food prices have been showing an upward trend. In March 2020, the CPI increased by 4 percent compared to the previous month, 24 percent compared to the previous year, and 49 percent higher than five years ago. The prices of staple commodities such as beans, maize, and salt continue to surpass their respective 5-year averages. Although the overall Consumer Price Index is higher for the rural areas, the 5-year price data from National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda highlighted that the prices for all staple commodities were lower in rural areas. Rwanda has formulated a social protective plan for the delivery of free food to at least 20 000 households in the capital Kigali. This indicates that urban populations would be more impacted by the upward price changes, especially those in informal sector activities, which require them to be mobile in order to earn an income. The study concluded that COVID-19 crisis is undermining the ability of agri-food enterprises to ensure consistent supplies of food to markets from enforced closures, labour shortages due to illness, and a slowdown in operations caused by physical distancing and lockdowns. These circumstances are compromising enterprises’ ability to continue with business as usual, and in many cases, threatening the survival of some beyond the crisis, with implications for food security and increased long-term poverty and malnutrition.

During lockdown, 95% of participants indicated income decline and 88% reported being food insecure. Three quarters of participants cooked less frequently and half altered their diet. One quarter (27%) of households primarily using liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) for cooking before lockdown switched to kerosene (14%) or wood (13%). These results indicate that the livelihoods of urban Rwandan families were deleteriously affected by COVID-19 lockdown, with a likely rise in household air pollution from community-level increases in polluting fuel use. To safeguard public health, policies should prioritize enhancing clean fuel and food access among the urban poor. The paper suggested three key policy priorities: support vulnerable households to mitigate the impacts of income loss through cash transfer or improved credit access; interventions to improve agricultural inputs supply chains to ease the pandemic’s impact on agricultural production; and support food insecure households through direct food distribution.

Keywords: Covid-19, Lockdown, Food Security, Rwanda

CITATION: Rwigema, P. C. (2021). Impact of Covid-19 lockdown on food security in Rwanda. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 8 (1), 899 – 925.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Altieri, M.A. & Nicholls, C.I. (2020). Agroecology and the reconstruction of a post-COVID-19 agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(5): 881-898.

Ashford, N., Hall, R., Arango-Quiroga, J., Metaxas, K., and Showalter, A. 2020. Addressing Inequality: The First Step Beyond COVID-19 and Towards Sustainability.” Sustainability 12(13): 5404.

Barrett, C. (2020). Actions now can curb food systems fallout from COVID-19. Nature Food. 1: 319-320.

Bracale, R. & Vaccaro, C.M. (2020). Changes in food choice following restrictive measures due to COVID-19. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases. 30(9): 1423-1426.

Bracale, R. & Vaccaro, C.M. 2020. Changes in food choice following restrictive measures due to COVID-19. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases. 30(9): 1423-1426.

Brzozowski, L. & Mazourek, M. 2018. A Sustainable Agricultural Future Relies on the Transition to Organic Agroecological Pest Management. Sustainability, 10: 2023

Chitu, L., Eichengreen, B., Mehl, A. (2020). Dollar dominance is as secure as American global leadership. In: The Economist. [Online] [Cited 21 August 2020] https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2020/08/08/dollar-dominance-is-assecure-as-american-global-leadership

Clapp, J. & Moseley, W.G. (forthcoming). This Food Crisis is Different: COVID-19 and the Fragility of the Neoliberal Food Security Order. The Journal of Peasant Studies.

Ekumah, B., Armah, F.A, Yawson, D.O., Quansah, R., Nyieku, F.E., Owusu, S.A., Odoi, J.O. & Afitiri, A. Disparate On-Site Access to Water, Sanitation, and Food Storage Heighten the Risk of COVID-19 Spread in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Research, 189: 109936.

Espitia, A., Rocha, N. & Ruta, M. 2020. Covid-19 and Food Protectionism. Policy Research Working Paper 9253. Washington, DC, World Bank. (also available at http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/417171589912076742/pdf/Covid-19-andFood-Protectionism-The-Impact-of-the-Pandemic-and-Export-Restrictions-on-World-FoodMarkets.pdf).

European Federation of Food Agriculture and Tourism Trade Unions (EFFAT). (2020.) Covid-19 outbreaks in slaughterhouses and meat processing plants: State of affairs and proposals for policy action at EU level. Brussels, EFFAT. (also available at https://effat.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/06/EFFAT-Report-Covid-19-outbreaks-in-slaughterhouses-and-meatpacking-plants-State-of-affairs-and-proposals-for-policy-action-at-EU-level-30.06.2020.pdf).

Everard, M., Johnston, P., Santillo, D. & Staddon, C. 2020. The role of ecosystems in mitigation and management of Covid-19 and other zoonoses. Environmental Science & Policy, 111: 7-17.

FAO. 2011. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2011: How does international price volatility affect domestic economies and food security? Rome, FAO

FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP & WHO. (2019). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2019. Safeguarding against economic slowdowns and downturns. Rome, FAO. (also available at https://www.wfp.org/publications/2019-state-food-security-and-nutrition-world-sofisafeguarding-against-economic).

FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP & WHO. (2020). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. Transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets. Rome, FAO. (also available at https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9692en).

FAO & WFP. (2020). FAO-WFP early warning analysis of acute food insecurity hotspots. (July 2020). Rome, FAO & WFP. (also available at http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb0258en).

Gengenbach, H., Schurman, R., Bassett, T., Munro, W. & Moseley, W. 2018. Limits of the New Green Revolution for Africa: reconceptualising gendered agricultural value chains. The Geographical Journal, 184(2): 208-214.

Ghebreyesus, T.A. (2020). WHO on Coronavirus Pandemic: “The Worst Is Yet to Come”?

HLPE. (2020b). Food Security and Nutrition: Building a Global Narrative towards 2030. Report 15. Rome, HLPE.

International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF). (2020). “ICMSF1 opinion on SARS-CoV-2 and its relationship to food safety.” September 3. International Union of Microbiological Societies.

Klassen, S. & Murphy, S. (2020). Equity as Both a Means and an End: Lessons for Resilient Food Systems from COVID-19. World Development, 136: 105104.

Laborde, D., Martin, W., Swinnen, J. & Vos, R. 2020. COVID-19 Risks to Global Food Security. Science, 369(6503): 500-502.

Lewis, L. 2020. Coronavirus serves up a surplus of Wagyu beef. Financial Times. April 3 2020. (also available at https://www.ft.com/content/bb540839-2f63-43bc-897c-b73b2d9f6dc7).

McLaren, H.J., Wong, K.R., Nguyen, K.N. & Mahamadachchi, K.N.D. 2020. Covid-19 and Women’s Triple Burden: Vignettes from Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Vietnam and Australia. Social Sciences, 9(5): 87.

McKeon, N. 2015. Food Security Governance: Empowering Communities, Regulating Corporations. London, Routledge.

MINICOM, (2015). Domestic Market Recapturing Strategy.

MINECOFIN, (2020). Economic Brief, April 2020.

Power, K. 2020. The COVID-19 Pandemic Has Increased the Care Burden of Women and Families. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1): 67-73.

Scudellari, M. (2020). How the pandemic might play out in 2021 and beyond. Nature. 584: 22-25

Sharma, H.B., Vanapalli, K.R., Cheela, V.R.S., Ranjan, V.P., Jaglan, A.K., Dubey, B., Goel, S. & Bhattacharya, J. 2020. Challenges, opportunities, and innovations for effective solid waste management during and post COVID-19 pandemic. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162: 105052.

Sustainable Development Solutions Network, Leadership Council. (2015b). Indicators and a Monitoring Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals: Launching a data revolution for the SDGs. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Retrieved from http://unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/150320-SDSN-Indicator-Report.pdf

Torero, M. (2020). Prepare food systems for a long-haul fight against COVID-19. [online]. Washington, DC, IFPRI. [Cited 31 August 2020]. https://www.ifpri.org/blog/prepare-foodsystems-long-haul-fight-against-covid-19).

United Nations (UN). (2020a). The Impact of COVID-19 on Latin America and the Caribbean. Policy Brief. July. (also available at https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-impact-covid-19- Latin-America-and-Caribbean).

United Nations (UN). (2020b). The Impact of COVID-19 on Food Security and Nutrition. June. (also available at https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/sg_policy_brief_on_covid_impact_o n_food_security.pdf).

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2015). Human Development Report: Work for Human Development. UNDP. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_human_development _report.pdf

UNCTAD. (2020a). The Covid-19 Shock to Developing Countries: Towards a ‘whatever it takes’ programme for two-thirds of the world’s population being left behind. March 2020. (also available at https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/gds_tdr2019_covid2_en.pdf).

UNCTAD. (2020b). World Investment Report 2020: International production beyond the pandemic. Geneva, UN. (also available at https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2020_en.pdf)

UNESCO. (2015). Financing Education in Saharan Africa—Meeting the Challenges of Expansion, Equity and Quality. UNESCO. As cited in http://www.aaionline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/AAI-SOE-report-2015-final.pdf

Vanapalli, K.R., Sharma, H.B., Ranjan, V.P., Samal, B., Bhattacharya, J., Dubey, B.K. & Goel, S. 2020. Challenges and strategies for effective plastic waste management during and post COVID-19 pandemic. Science of The Total Environment, 750: 141514

Van den Broeck, G. & Maertens, M. 2016. Horticultural exports and food security in developing countries. Global Food Security, 10: 11-20.

World Bank. 2020a. Global Economic Prospects, June 2020. Washington, DC, World Bank.

World Food Programme (WFP). 2020a. Global Monitoring of School Meals during COVID-19 Closures. [online].

World Bank (2019). World Development Indicators

World Bank. (2020). The Economic Impact of the 2014 Ebola Epidemic: Short and Medium Term Estimates for Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. The World Bank.

Yaffe-Bellany, D. & Corkery, M. 2020. Dumped Milk, Smashed Eggs, Plowed Vegetables: The Food Waste of the Pandemic. New York Times, April 11. (also available at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/11/ business/coronavirus-destroyingfood.html?searchResultPosition=1).

Young, G. & Crush, J. 2019. Governing the informal food sector in cities of the Global South. Hungry Cities Discussion Paper 30.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v8i1.1957

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.