EFFECT OF SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF FLOWER FIRMS IN NAIROBI

ABIUD OBENGA ONYANGO, DR. ROSE LITUNYA (PhD)

Abstract


The main purpose of this study was to determine the effect of supplier management on organizational performance of flower firms. Almost every organization purchases goods and services from third parties, or suppliers. The output of one organization is often the goods and services that form aspects of other organizations’ goods and services. Therefore, how an organization engages, establishes, manages, and communicates with its suppliers is critical to success. This is because competition is no longer between organizations, but among the supply chains. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of supplier management on organizational performance of flower firms in Nairobi. The target population of this study was flower firms in Nairobi, where 3 respondents from the 9 selected firms were used. The study looked at supplier development as an element of supplier management and the effects that it has on organizational performance.  The study adopted descriptive survey design. The population of the study comprised of 10 flower farms that were drawn from Nairobi. The target population involved managers and top supervisors from the procurement department. A sample of 30 respondents was selected from a target population of 10 flower firms. Random sampling was used to come up with the sample size.  Primary data for the study was collected using questionnaires.  The results of the study were presented using frequency tables, pie charts and graphs. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive and correlated using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient to measure the relationship between variables with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 21.0).  The findings of the study showed a strong positive effect of supplier development on organizational performance of flower firms in Nairobi. The study further recommended for continued collaboration, stakeholder engagement to enhance performance of flower firms. On suggestion for further research, the study recommended that further research to be carried on other supplier management practices that influences organizational performance in the supply chain sector.

Keywords: Supplier Development, Supplier Management, Supply Chains  

 

CITATION: Onyango, A. O., & Litunya, R. (2021). Effect of supplier management on organizational performance of flower firms in Nairobi. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 8 (3), 1017 – 1028.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Biermann, R., & Harsch, M. (2017). Resource dependence theory. In Palgrave Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations in World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Blakemore, S. (2015). Buying into a greater product procurement role for nurses. Nursing Management (2014), 22(8), 8.

Carithers, L. J., Ardlie, K., Barcus, M., Branton, P. A., Britton, A., Buia, S. A., ... & Guan, P. (2015). A novel approach to high-quality postmortem tissue procurement: the GTEx project. Biopreservation and biobanking, 13(5), 311-319.

Daily Nation Kenya: Kenya flower firm held back by dollar rise, Thursday January 28, 2016

Ferri, L. M., Oelze, N., Habisch, A., & Molteni, M. (2016). Implementation of responsible procurement management: an institutional perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(4), 261-276.

Huang, M. C., Yen, G. F., & Liu, T. C. (2014). Reexamining supply chain integration and the supplier's performance relationships under uncertainty. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 64-78.

Kenya Flower Council: Global competitiveness, November 2012

Kenneth, H. & Laudon, F. (2007) Inclusive supply chain using electronic market- places”, Integrated Manufacturing Systems.Open University Press, Buckingham: Philadelphia

Kiarie, J. W. (2017). The Influence of supplier relationship management practices on operational performance of large manufacturing organizations in Kenya (Thesis). Strathmore University.

Leppelt, T., Foerstl, K., Reuter, C., & Hartmann, E. (2013). Sustainability management beyond organizational boundaries–sustainable supplier relationship management in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 94-102.

Liebman, J. B., & Mahoney, N. (2017). Do expiring budgets lead to wasteful year-end spending? Evidence from federal procurement. American Economic Review, 107(11), 3510-49.

Maram R., Merihan M., Sarah H., Sara E. and Lobna H. (2015). Investigating the impact of suppliers relationship management on firms’ performance: A Multiple Case Study

Narayanan, S., Narasimhan, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2015). Assessing the contingent effects of collaboration on agility performance in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 140-154.

Onyango, A.O (2011). Supply chain management practices in the cement industry in Kenya. Unpublished MBA project, University of Nairobi

Otilo, K.O (2011) supply chain management practices in cosmetic industry. Unpublished MBA project University of Nairobi

Qrunfleh, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2014). Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 340-350.

Schabenberger, O., & Gotway, C. A. (2017). Statistical methods for spatial data analysis. CRC press.

Shin, H., Collier, D. A., & Wilson, D. D. (2000). Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance. Journal of operations management, 18(3), 317-333.

Stevens, G. C., & Johnson, M. (2016). Integrating the Supply Chain… 25 years on. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(1), 19-42.

Tseng, S. M. (2014). The impact of knowledge management capabilities and supplier relationship management on corporate performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 39-47.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v8i3.2077

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.