THE EAC-COMESA-SADC TRIPARTITE FREE TRADE AREA: IMPACT ON RWANDA'S EXPORTS

DR. PIERRE-CELESTIN RWIGEMA (PhD)

Abstract


Intra-African trade, which has remained under 12 per cent in the last decade, is low compared to other major regions of the world. In January 2012, the African Union (AU) Summit of African Heads of State and Government endorsed the theme of “Boosting Intra-African trade” and called on Member States, Regional Economic Communities (RECs) and the AU Commission to promote industrial development with a view to diversify economies and moving away from heavy reliance on traditional primary commodities for export. Using disaggregate export and import statistics Harmonized System at the 6-digit level from BACI and COMTRADE data sets between 1998 and 2009, measures of export diversification (using Harfindahl-Hirshman Index) and intra-industry trade (using Grubel-Lloyd Index) are computed for Rwanda which is available from National Institute of Statistics. The paper also reviewed the works of other researchers on the impact of trade impacts on export performance in Rwanda. Secondary data was used for purposes of qualitative research. On the other hand, the researcher used ex-ante descriptive tools to review Rwanda’s export situation and from there drew conclusions on the potential of the Rwanda’s export performance with data coming from EAC, COMESA, SADC and FTA and other data sources for purposes of quantitative analysis.Preliminary results indicated that while both export diversification and intra-industry trade in Africa are generally low, there are exception cases. In addition, a positive correlation between export diversification and intra-industry trade is found for the sample of African countries. This has implication for policy dialogue suggesting that any future trade policy designed to favor export diversification has positive implications for intra-industry trade and vice versa. Other findings from the technical work provided two important contributions to the direction of current trade policy dialogue on boosting Intra-African trade. First, export diversification and intra-industry trade policies should not be treated in isolation. Second, we identified constraints towards export diversification and intra-industry trade in Africa crucial towards better understanding and subsequently developing effective program of actions for boosting Intra-African trade. Rwanda's economic performance in the near future depends very much on the strategic investment programmes to improve its infrastructure, the global demand for its exports, and the improved business climate and its effects on promoting private investment.  In order for Rwanda to overcome infrastructure bottlenecks and other supply-side constraints, investment is needed in, inter alia, broadening access to electricity for the population by increasing household grid-connectivity; the railway line to facilitate Rwanda's import/export trade;  the construction of an international airport in Bugesera;  and in irrigation systems to promote agricultural productivity.

How can Rwanda, which currently has one of the lowest levels of income and exports per capita in the world, grow and diversify its economy in presence of significant constraints? Three basic commodities – coffee, tea, and tin – made up more than 80 percent of the country’s exports through its history and still drive the bulk of export growth today. Given Rwanda’s high population density and associated land scarcity, these traditional exports cannot create enough jobs for its growing population, or sustainably drive future growth. Rwanda needs new, scalable activities in urban areas. In this report, we identify a strategy for greater diversification of exports in Rwanda that circumvents the key constraints and is separately tailored for regional and global export destinations. Our results identified more than 100 tradable products that lie at Rwanda’s knowledge frontier, are not intensive in Rwanda’s scarce resources, and economize on transportation costs. Our analysis produces a vision of a more diversified Rwanda, which can be used as a guide for investment promotion decisions. Based on the reviews and analyses, it was found that the impact of the Tripartite on Rwanda export performance maybe small with regards to export performance. However, Rwanda stood to benefit greatly from the tripartite by bringing transparency in the regional trade regime and harmonization of policies. This will eventually bring about predictability in Rwanda trade agenda and help reduce trade costs. Lastly, the study drew conclusions and offers policy recommendations on future measures to be taken with the view of ensuring that Rwanda gains from the Tripartite. Given the heterogeneity of the effect of FTAs across regions in Africa, it is important to structure negotiations to be region-specific to avoid the policy overlaps of existing trade agreements within regions.

Keywords: Rwanda, Tripartite Free Trade Area, Free Trade Agreements; International Trade, Africa, COMESA and Export performance

CITATION: Rwigema, P, C. (2021). The EAC-COMESA-SADC tripartite free trade area: Impact on Rwanda's exports. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 8 (2), 1039 – 1085.


Full Text:

PDF

References


AFDB. (2016). African Regional Integration Report 2016. Addis Abbaba: African Development Bank.

Amiti, Mary, & Konings, Jozef (2007), Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Boosting Exports through intermediate goods.

Angwenyi, V. (2016). The Tripertite Free Trade Area: A Step Closer to the African Economic Community? In M. B. (eds), European Yearbook of International Economic law. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Brenton et al (2011), Risky Business: Poor Women Cross-Border Traders in the Great Lakes Region of Africa. World Bank.

Brenton, Cardot and Pierola (2012), Pathways to African Export Sustainability, World Bank.

Collier, P. (2012). Aid dependency: How can Rwanda move toward self-sustained growth in coming years. International Growth Centre.

Dimaranan, B. a. (2008). The COMESA Customs Union: A Quantitative Assessment. GTAP 11th Annual Conference. Helsinki.

EAC (2015), Status for the Elimination of Non-Tariff Barriers in the East Africa Community as of September 2015.

EAC (2014), Trade Report.

Fernandes, Freund and Pierola (2015), Exporter Behavior, Country Size and Stage of Development Evidence from the Exporter Dynamics Database.

Gathani, S., & Stoelinga, D. (2012). Understanding Rwanda’s Export Sectors. International Growth Centre working paper.

GoR, (2016), AGOA Implementation Plan.

GoR, (2015), BNR Foreign Private Capital in Rwanda.

GoR, BNR (2017), Monetary Policy and Financial Stability Statement (2017).

GoR, MINICOFIN, Rwanda Annual Economic Report, 2014/2015.

GoR, NAEB Annual Report 2014-2015.

GoR, Nation Cross-Border Strategy (2011-2017).

GoR, National Export Strategy II.

GoR, National strategy for the Elimination of Non-Tariff Barriers (2011).

GoR, Private Sector Development Strategy (2013-2018).

Hallren, R. a. (2017). An Introduction of Prtial Equilibrium Modelling of Trade Policy (Vols. Working Paper 2017­07­B). Washington, DC.: International Trade Commission.

Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. a. (2011). The network structure of economic output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16(4), 309–342. doi:10.1007/s10887-011-9071-4

Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jimenez, J., Simoes, A., et al. (2011). Atlas of Economic Complexity. Cambridge, MA: Puritan Press.

Hidalgo, C. (2011). Discovering Southern and East Africa’s Industrial Opportunities.

Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487.

Hausmann, Ricardo, Dani Rodrik, and Andrés Velasco. "Growth diagnostics." The Washington consensus reconsidered: Towards a new global governance (2008): 324-355.

IGC, Raising Exports and Attracting FDI in Rwanda (2016).

ITC, Rwanda: Company Perspectives – An Itc Series on Non-Tariff Measures 2014.

Jensen, H. G. (2011). The TRipartite Free TRade Agreemnet: A Computer Anaysis of the Impact. In R. a. Sandrey, Cape to Cairo ­ An Assessment of the Tripartite Free Trade Area. Stellenbosch, South Africa: Trade Law Center for Southern Africa.

Kalenga, P. (2013). Making the Tripartite FTA Work: Issues and Prospects. Trade Law Center.

Mevel, S. a. (2012). Deeping Regional Integration in Africa: A Computable General Equilibrium Assessment of the Establishment of Continental Free Trade Area followed by a Continental Customs Union. 7th African Economic Conference. Kigali.

Mold, A. a. (2016). Modelling the Economic Impact of the Tripartite Free Trade Area: Its Implications for the Economic Geography of Southern, Eastern and Northern Africa. Journal of African Trade (3), 57­84.

Oloruntoba, S. O. (2017). Breaking the Incubus? The Tripartite Free Trade Agreements and the Prospects of Developmental Integration in Africa. In J. O. O. Akanle, The Development of Africa. Springer International Publishing.

Petros, S. (2011). Towards a COMESA, EAC and SADC Tripartite Free Trade Area. Harare, Zimbabwe: Trades Centre.

Pierola and Freund, The Origins and Dynamics of Export Superstars (2016).

Riedel, J. a. (2014). The Trade Potential of the COMESA­EAC­SADC Tripartite: A Comparitive Analysis.

Willenbockel, D. (2014). An Ex­Ante General Equilibrium Analysis of the COMESA ­ EAC ­ SADC Tripartite Free Trade Agreement. International Conference on Economic Modeling. Bali.

World Bank. (2011). Harnessing Regional Integration for Trade and Growth in Sub­-Saharan Africa. Washington DC: World Bank.

World Bank, Rwanda Agriculture Sector Risk Assessment (2015).

World Bank, Rwanda Economic Update, Leveraging Regional Integration (2012).

World Bank, Rwanda Jobs and Employment Study (2015).

World Bank, Africa's Pulse: An analysis of issues shaping Africa's economic future (2016).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v8i3.2081

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.