FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURING FIRMS REGISTERED WITH KENYA ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS

ABDULLAHI ISSE, DR. FREDRICK WARUI (PhD), DR. MARGRET KOSGEI (PhD)

Abstract


Manufacturing firms in Kenya have been marred with unprecedented losses even despite government concerted efforts to attract the inflows of foreign direct investors in the manufacturing sector. The worst-hit include: Mumias Sugar Company that recorded a net loss for the periods of 2017 and 2018, East African Portland Cement that also posted net loss for the financial year 2019, Nzoia Sugar Ltd, Sony and Chemelil both recorded losses in the financial year 2014/15. Therefore, it is on this grounds that this research sought to establish the relationship that exist between foreign technological flow and financial performance while consecrating the moderating effect of  political was informed by two main theories that include resource-based theory and agency theory. It was also anchored on pragramatic philosophy. The study used both correlational cross-section survey design targeting firms in the manufacturing sector that are registered by Kenya Association of Manufacturers. This study covered the data obtained from 2017 to 2021. A census was conducted on all the 81 targeted firms. The research employed data from first hand and auxiliary sources guided by questionnaire and data collection sheet respectively.  The study instrument had been pilot tested to ensure it was valid and reliable enough. A test for normality and autocorrelation was also carried out, after which the collected data was analyzed quantitatively using descriptive and inferential statistics. The data was presented in form of tables, charts and narratives. The study established that foreign technological flow were significant predictors of financial performance moderated by political risk. The study concludes that foreign direct investment is a significant enabler of financial performance moderated by political risk. The study recommended that ICT managers of the manufacturing firms in Kenya should leverage the soft and hard technological flows to support the processes and enhance financial performance of their firms. 

Key Words: Foreign Direct Investment, Market Diversification

CITATION: Abdullahi, I.,  Warui, F., &  Kosgei, M. (2022). Foreign direct investment and financial performance of manufacturing firms registered with Kenya association of manufacturers. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 9 (2), 837 – 845.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayhan, F. (2019). The Effects of Political and Economic Risk on FDI: A Theoretical Survey. In Global Trends of Modernization in Budgeting and Finance (pp. 44-63). IGI Global

Cooper D. and Schindler P. (2014). Business Research Methods, 12th Ed. London, UK: Publisher, McGraw-Hill Education

Cooper D. R. and Schindler P.S (2011) Business Research Methods. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Crone M. and Roper S (1999) Local Learning from Multinational Plants: Knowledge Transfers in the Supply Chain. Northern Ireland Economic Research Center, Working Paper No. 46.

Denscombe M. (2008) Communities of practice: a research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol 2(3) pp 270-283.

Dragusha, S. B. (2016). The Impact of Political Risk on Foreign Direct Investment. ILIRIA International Review, 4(2), 73-92.

Easterly W. and Levine R. (2001). It's not factor accumulation: stylized facts and growth models. World Bank Econ. Rev. 2001.

Elteto A. (2001) The Competitiveness of Hungarian Companies. Institute for World Economics Working Papers No. 118, Budapest.

Fernandez I. M., Muhoho J. and Kahuthia J. (2019) Foreign Direct Investment and Financial Performance: A Case of NSE Listed Insurance Companies with Foreign Ownership. International Academic Journal of Economics and Finance, Volume 3(3) pp. 369-381

Javorcik B. (2004) Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. Am. Econ. Rev. Vol 94 pp 605–627.

Khan, M. M., & Akbar, M. I. (2013). The impact of political risk on foreign direct investment.

Koen S. and Bartoldus V. (2002) Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers Within and Between Sectors: Evidence from Hungarian Data, Ghert University, Faculty of Economics and Business Discussion paper No. 157.

Nelso, M. M., Sooreea, R., & Gokcek, G. (2016). The FDI-political risk nexus: some new insights. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 11(1).

Newman C., Rand J., Theodore T and Finn T. (2015) Technology transfers, foreign investment and productivity spillovers. European Economic Review, Vol 76 pp168–187

Osabutey, E. L., & Okoro, C. (2015). Political risk and foreign direct investment in Africa: The case of the Nigerian telecommunications industry. Thunderbird International Business Review, 57(6), 417-429.

Portelli B. and Narula R. (2003) Foreign Direct Investment Through Acquisitions and Implications for Technological Upgrading. Case Evidence from Tanzania. Globalization as Transformative Process Working Paper Series, No. 05/03, University of Oslo, Norway.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers, “A Homecoming for U.S. Manufacturing,” July, 2016.

Skenderi M. (2012) The Impact of Technological Transfer from Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on Host Economies - The Case of Albania. (Doctoral Thesis submitted to the University of Sheffield)

West, D. M., and Lansang, C. (2018). Global manufacturing scorecard: How the US compares to 18 other nations.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v9i2.2303

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.