E-PROCUREMENT PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS IN RWANDA: A CASE OF KICUKIRO DISTRICT

BYIRINGIRO KAYIRANGA DANIEL, PROF. NNAMDI MADICHIE (PhD)

Abstract


The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of e-procurement practices on the performance of public institutions in Rwanda using Kicukiro district as a case study. This study was principally completed following the reports that arose referring to lackluster showing of Rwandan public organizations, which was generally been ascribed to insufficient and unseemly running of the public money during acquirement processes. To achieve this, study the following specific objectives that guided the study were; to determine the effect of E-Bidding on performance of public institutions in Rwanda, to examine the effect of E-Tendering on performance of public institutions in Rwanda, to assess the effect of E-sourcing on performance of public institutions in Rwanda and to establish the effect of E-Invoicing on performance of public institutions in Rwanda. The study adopted descriptive survey design. Data was collected through questionnaires. The target population of the study were 93 respondents who are staffs and employees of Kicukiro District because they deal with suppliers’ issues in their day operations. Analysis of the data was done using frequency and percentage tables to analyze the demographic information provided regarding the respondents and the organization, mean and standard deviation. The study found that there exist a positive association of e-sourcing to performance of Kicukiro District. This positive association suggests that when one increases, performance of Kicukiro District increases. The study found out that bidding offers a more efficient communication infrastructure with lower transaction costs was agreed at 42.9%, Top management of Kicukiro District always assesses functionality of e-bidding was also agreed at 42.9%, Kicukiro District uses e-bidding components to watch over safety measures and risk was agreed at 39.7%. On E-Tendering practices involved suppliers posting their bids electronically, tender specification and documents sent online, receipt of tender responses electronically, tender notices conveyed to the public electronically and authenticity of bids submitted as represented by means of 3.78, 3.98, 3.92, 4.14, 4.29, 4.43 and 4.50 respectively. Majority of procurement officers agreed to statements that: It helps in achieving low cost in procurement transactions (55.9%); E-sourcing creates value to the organization through innovation (50.0%); It improves communication between the organization and new suppliers (47.1%); It compels the organization to be super-efficient and proactive in their quest to increase return on their investments (47.1%); E-sourcing reduces costs through improved process efficiencies (44.1%). Majority of procurement officers strongly agreed to statements that: Through the reduction in use of papers it offers environmental benefits (44.1%); Compared with traditional paper invoices, the e-invoice can help businesses achieve paperless, transparent transactions (35.3%); It offers easy retrieval and processing of data (35.3%); It offers greater security of data in the organization (32.4%). The study concluded that E-tendering, E-bidding, E-invoicing and E-sourcing are all statistically significant and influence performance of public institutions. The study findings reveal that majority of the respondents indicated that e-tendering process influences performance of procurement function in the organization to a great extent. Majority of the respondents were neutral as to whether e-auctioning process influences performance of procurement function in the organization. Majority of procurement officers agreed to statements that: E-bidding provide buyers and sellers an open environment. The study recommended that Kicukiro District should use a joint policy in the establishment of similar systems of selecting and issuing tenders as a standard procedure to ensure high levels of performance. Kicukiro District should automate the practice of invoicing so as to promote transparency and record management since it will be easier to track records or identify payments to be made to suppliers.

Keywords: e-Bidding, e-Tendering, e-Sourcing, e-Invoicing, public institution performance, Kicukiro District

CITATION: Byiringiro, K. D., & Madichie, N. (2022). E-procurement practices and performance of public institutions in rwanda: A case of Kicukiro District. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 9 (4), 744 – 760.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abiola, J., & Asiweh, M. (2012). Impact of Tax administration on Government Revenue. International Journal of Business and Social Science , 3 (8), 99-113.

Abushaikha, I. (2014). Supply chain integration from a resource-based view perspective: empirical evidence from Jordan's garment manufacturers international supply chains (Doctoral dissertation, Heriot-Watt University).

Agaba, E., & Shipman, N. (2017). Public procurement reform in developing countries: The Ugandan experience. Advancing public procurement: Practices, innovation and knowledge-sharing, 2(4), 373-391.

Ahimbisibwe, A. (2016). "Adoption Of E-Procurement Technology In Uganda: Migration From The Manual Public Procurement Systems To The Internet". Research Journal of Supply Chain Management.(3)1

Ahimbisibwe, A. (2016). "Best Practices in E-Procurement: Reducing Costs and Increasing Value through Online Buying". in aberdeen, aberdeen group. (2) 3. (pp. pp. 6-7.).

Al-Saa’da, R., Abu Taleb, Y., Al-Mahasneh, R., Nimer, N., & Al-Weshah, G. (2013). Supply Chain Management and Its Effect on Health Care Service Quality: Quantitative Evidence from Jordanian Private Hospitals. Journal of Management and Strategy, 4(2), 42–51.

Asima, Y.S. & Februati, T. (2014). E-Procurement Policy Model: Striving towards Transparency in Goods and Services Procurement in North Sumatera Indonesia, Public Policy and Administration Research, 4(12) 2014.

Asogwa, B. E. (2013). Electronic government as a paradigm shift for efficient public services, Library Hi Tech, 31(1), 141 – 159.

Basheka, B., Oluka, P. & Mugurusi, G. (2012) ‘Adopting new approaches for public procurement efficiency: critical success factors (CSFs) for the implementation of e-procurement in Uganda’s public sector’, International Journal of Procurement Management, 5(6), 712–732.

Bigsten, A. (2013). Fiscal capacity and the quality of government in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 45, 92-107.

Bovis, C. (2016). Research Handbook on EU Public Procurement Law. London, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Boyd, L., & Gupta, M. (2014). Constraints management: what is the theory? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(4), 350-371.

Brazel, J. & Dang, L. (2018).The Effect of ERP System Implementations on the Management of Earnings and Earnings Release Dates. Journal of Information Systems, 22(2)1-21.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2013). Business Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bryntse, K. (2016). The purchasing of public services exploring the purchasing function in a service context. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 2(4), 193-201.

Burns, R, A., & Burns, R. (2012). Business Research Methods and Statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications Ltd

Calipinar, H., & Soysal, M. (2012). E-Procurement: A Case Study about the Health Sector in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7), 232–244.

Chen, D., Preston, D., & Xia, W. (2013). Enhancing hospital supply chain performance: A relational view and empirical test. Journal of Operations Management, 31(6), 391–408.

Cooper D. & Schindler, P.S. (2013). Business Research Methods. New York. McGraw-Hill.

Creswell, J., (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. India: SAGE Publications. 4th Ed.

Croom, S. (2017). The Impact of Web-Based Procurement on the Management of Operating Resources Supply. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(1), 4–13.

Davis, P. (2014). “Procurement and Foreign Direct investment (FDI).” (White Paper). SAGIA

Dimitri, N. (2013). “Best Value for Money In Procurement.” Journal of Public Procurement, 13(2): 149-175.

Flynn, A. & Davis, P. (2014). “Theory in Public Procurement Research.” Journal of Public Procurement, 14(2): 139-180

Gelderman, C. J., Ghijsen, P. W. T., & Brugman, M. J. (2016). Public procurement and EU tendering directives–explaining non-compliance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(7), 702-714.

Graells, A. S. (2015). Public Procurement and the EU Competition Rules. London, UK, Bloomsbury Publishing.

Gupta, M., & Narain, R. (2015). A fuzzy ANP based approach in the selection of the best e-Business strategy and to assess the impact of E-Procurement on organizational performance. Information Technology and Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, 339-349.

Hanak, T., & Muchova, P. (2015). “Impact of Competition on Prices in Public Sector Procurement.” Procedia Computer Science, 64: 729 – 735

Harelimana, J.B. (2018). The Impact of E-Procurement on the Performance of Public Institutions in Rwanda. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: Accounting and Auditing (18) 2, 21-31

Huo, B., Zhao, X. & Lai, F. (2014). Supply chain quality integration: antecedents and consequences, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(1), 38-51.

Kaburi, S.N., Omari, A.O., & Sewe, T. (2017). Change Dilemma: A Case of Structural Adjustment through Devolution in Kenya. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 1(7), 40-47.

Khan, N. (2018). Public Procurement Fundamentals: Lessons from and for the Field. London, UK: Emerald Group Publishing,

Kicukiro District. (2018). For construction of 111 classrooms and 162 latrines under quality basic education for human capital development (qbe-hcd) project in Kicukiro district. Environmental and social management plan (esmp).

Kock, N. & Lynn, G.S. (2012). Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 2.

Kothari, C. (2014). Research Methodology; Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New age International Publishers.

Kombo, D. & Tromp, D. (2016). Proposal and Thesis Writing: An Introduction. Nairobi: Pauline Publications Africa.

Kothari, C., & Garg, G., (2014). Research Methodology. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd. Publishers.

Kothari, C.R. & Gaurav, G. (2014). Research Methodology, (3rd Ed.), New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.

Laryea, S., & Ibem, E. O. (2016). Patterns of Technological Innovation in the use of e-Procurement in Construction. Journal of information Technology in Construction, 19, 104-125.

Matunga, D., Nyanamba, S., & Okibo, W. (2013). The Effect of E-Procurement Practices on Effective Procurement in Public Hospitals: A Case of KISII Level 5 Hospital. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(8), 103–111.

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

McCue, C. Roma, V. A. (2012) E-Procurement: Myth or Reality? Journal of Public Procurement, 12(2), pp. 212-238.

McManus, S. (2012), “Understanding the incremental nature of e-procurement implementation at the state and local levels”, Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 2, pp. 5-28.

MINECOFIN. (2017). Rwanda Vision 2020: Annual Report. Kigali City.

Mose, J. M., Njihia, J. M., & Magutu, P. O. (2013). The critical success factors and challenges in e-procurement adoption among large scale manufacturing firms in Nairobi, Kenya. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 9(13).

Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, G. (2012). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, Nairobi: Acts Press

Neuman, W. L., & Robson, K. (2014). Basics of Social Research. Toronto, Canada: Pearson

Ngendahimana L. (2014). Impact of supply chain management on business growth the case of “Inyange industries ltd” No. 4, 1993, pp. 42- 54

Ngechu. M. (2012). Understanding the research process and methods. An introduction to research methods. Nairobi: Acts Press.

Office of Auditor General (2020). 2018/2019 financial report of Office of Auditor General,

Orodho, J.A. (2015). Elements of Education and Social Research Methods. Nairobi: Masola Publishers.

Osoro. J. (2018). The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Procurement Performance in Manufacturing Firms in Kenya. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, School of Entrepreneurship, Procurement and Management, Nairobi, Kenya

Rwiyereka, A. K. (2014). “Using Rwandan traditions to strengthen programme and policy implementation”, Development in Practice, 24(5-6), 686-692.

Saad, Y. G. (2016). “Anti-fragilizing Public Procurement Systems: A Paradigm Shift.” Journal of Public Procurement, 16(4): 419-453.

Sekaran, U. (2017). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. New Delhi: John Wiley and Sons

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2015). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. (5eds.). New Delhi: John Wiley & Sons.

Thai, K. V. (2016). International Public Procurement: Innovation and Knowledge Sharing. Cham, Switzerland: Springer

Vaidya, A. Sajeev & Callender,G (2016).Critical Factors that Influence E-Procurement Implementation Success in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Procurement, Volume 6, Issues 1 & 3, 70-99;

Wang, Y., Yan, H., & Wan, J. (2016). Electronic Commerce Platform of Manufacturing Industry under Industrial Internet of Things. In International Conference on Industrial IoT Technologies and Applications (pp. 137-143). Springer, Cham

World Bank. (2013). E-Procurement in Government of Andhra Pradesh, India. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Zunk, B., Marchner, M., Uitz, I., Lerch, C., & Schiele, H. (2014). The Role of E-Procurement in the Austrian Construction Industry: Adoption Rate, Benefits and Barriers. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 5(1), 13–21.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v9i4.2447

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.