INFLUENCE OF ORGANIZATIONAL RESTRUCTURING ON PERFORMANCE OF COOMERCIAL BANKS IN KENYA: A CASE OF KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK

MAUREEN NYAMBUNE ONGWAE

Abstract


Organizational restructuring is a process which includes improvement in efficiency and management, reduction in staff and wages and sale of assets with the expectation of higher profitability and cash flow. This study was to evaluate the impact of organizational restructure on the performance of commercial banks in Kenya. This study was guided by the specific objective that seek to find out the effect of centralization of activities, departmentalization, and staff turnover on the performance of banking sector in Kenya. The theories that were used to describe the research objectives included innovation theory; resource based theory, management by objectives theory and planned change theory. The scope of the study spanned from the year 2001 to 2014. That was the period within which the commercial banks in Kenya had incurred high operating expenses and also went through restructuring to reduce cost and promote efficiency. The target population included employees of the commercial banks at the head office. This was because major decisions impacting on the performance of the company were formulated and implemented at the head office. Hence a sample size of 462 staff were taken from commercial banks head office units. The study used stratified random sampling techniques to select the sample. Primary data was collected through a questionnaire that was distributed to respondents. The study explored literature on the financial performance of KCB between the years 2001 and 2014. The data from the questionnaires was screened and entered in readiness for analysis using SPSS software version 21. Results were presented using pie charts, bar charts and graphs, percentages and frequency tables. The analysis showed that systems upgrade had the strongest positive (Pearson correlation coefficient =.881) influence on performance of banking sector. In addition, departmentation, centralization of processes and staff turnover are positively correlated to performance of banking sector (Pearson correlation coefficient =.672, .579 and .611). The study recommended that to improve organizational restructuring on performance of banking sector, the management should make sure that all the respective heads of departments had full and clear information on time to enhance easy decision making on organizational restructuring  to enhance performance at KCB.

Key Words: System Upgrade, Centralization of Processes, Downsizing, Departmentalization, Performance of Commercial Banks


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashmos, D.P. (2000). Participation in strategic decision-making: The role of organizational predisposition and issue interpretation. Decision Sciences 29 (1): 25-51.

Athey, S. et al. (2004). The Allocation of Decisions in Organizations, Graduate School of Business Research, Paper no. 1322. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

Barclays Bank Annual Report, 2010

Bartlett, C. A. (2000). Beyond strategic planning to organization learning: Lifeblood of the Individualized corporation. Strategy and Leadership, 26(1), 7,

Batley, R. (2004). The changing role of government: The reform of public services in developing countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brockner (2002). The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness, Quarterly review 37 (2) 241-261

Brockner, J.C. (2000). Layoffs, self-esteem, and survivor guilt: Motivational, affective, and attitudinal consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36: 230-244.

Brockner, J. (2004). Perceived Control as an Antidote to the Negative Effects of Layoffs on Survivors’ Organizational Commitment and Job Performance. Boston University

Brockner, J. (2003). Threat of future layoffs, self-esteem, and survivors' reactions: Evidence from the laboratory and the field. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 153-176

Central Bank of Kenya, Supervision Annual Report, .2001

Cascio, W. F. (2002). Responsible Restructuring: creative and profitable alternatives to lay off, USA, Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

Cascio, W. F. (2003). Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned?” Academy of Management Executive, 7: 95-101

Equity Bank annual report, 2010

Glisson, C. A. (1980). Productivity and Efficiency in Human Service Organizations as Related to Structure, Size and Age. Academy of Management Journal 23 (1): 21-37.

Gopinath, C (2000). Communication, procedural justice, and employee attitudes: Relationships under conditions of divestiture. Journal of Management, 26: 63-80

Hall, R. H. (1982). Organizations: Structure and Process, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs; London: Prentice-Hall.

Hawkins, (2003). Bank restructuring in South East Asia, Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Houssin, A. (2010). An extensive restructuring imposed by a crisis, case of Dexia;

KCB (2013). Kenya Commercial Bank FY13 Results Summary. Retrieved 18th February, 2015 from:http://www.google.com/urlfinancil-securities.comKCB-FY2013

Lattman, .P (2013). Mass Layoffs at a Top-Flight Law Firm.

Maia, (2000). Restructuring the Banking system, the case of Brazil, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mallory, J. (2013). Profitability possible without layoffs. Retrieved on 17th July 2013 from. http://www.joystiq.com/2013/07/06/iwata-profitabilitiy-possible-without-layoffs/

Marsick, V. J. (2008). Learning in the Workplace: The case for reflectivity and critical reflectivity. Adult Education Quarterly, 38(4), 187-198.

Munjuri, M. (2011). A survey of the criteria used by commercial banks in Kenya to determine employees to retrench, The CDF Insight: 1-4.

Maynard-Moody, S. (2003). Cops, teachers and counsellors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.

Miles, R. E. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mwandembo, C. (2009). An Examination of Staff Layoffs in Kenya: Evidence from companies quoted in the Main Investment Market Segment of the Nairobi Stock Exchange. Strathmore University

Nag & Pathak, (2009). Corporate Restructuring: A boon for competitive advantage. American society for competitiveness.

Osterman, P. (2001).“The Role of Promotion in Inducing Specific Human Capital Acquisition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 523–34

Pollitt, C.,& Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Prahalad, (2000). The core competence of corporation, Havard Business Review, 68 (3) 79-91

Riccucci, N. M. (2005). How management matters: Street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform. Georgetown University Press.

Rogers, E. M. (2000). Diffusion of Innovations. (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Schein, E. H. (2000). How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room, Sloan Management Review, 34(2), 85-92

Sridevi M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: the key to improving performance. International Journal of Business management, 5 (12) 89

Spreitzer, G.M. (2000). The Organization in Crisis: Downsizing, Restructuring, and Privatization: 97-120. London: Blackwell.

Spreitzer, G.M. (2002). To stay or to go: Voluntary survivor turnover following an organizational downsizing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 705- 729

Takahito, K. & Kazuyuki M., (2000). Centralization or Decentralization of Decision Rights? Impact on Performance of Firms. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-E-032

Useem, M. (2000). When does restructuring improve economic performance, Minneapolis/St.Paul: West Publishing Company

Zábojnı́k, J. (2002). Centralized and Decentralized Decision Making in Organizations. Journal of Labor Economics, 20: 22-17




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v3i2.259

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.