INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES ON ORGANISATION PERFORMANCE: CASE OF KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY, KENYA

SAMUEL MERIA MURUU, JANE NJOROGE, PhD

Abstract


Organisation management is regarded as a fundamental necessity for running any institution, strengthening directors' performance, openness, and disclosure, giving account, risk management, internal audit, effective leadership, and sound corporate citizenship. Kenya Power & Lightning Company is one of the parastatals in Kenya where the government is the major and controlling shareholder. The organisation is charged with the role of supplying electrical power to the citizens and commercial enterprises. Despite the growing population in the country, Kenya Power is the only organisation tasked with connecting the citizens to the power grid, therefore, acting as a monopoly. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of organisation management principles employed by Kenya Power & Lightning Company. This study was guided by two theories, the famous Agency Theory and Stakeholder Theory. The study involved a population of 376 personnel comprising corporate managers, tactical managers, and subordinate personnel working at the organisation's head office. The use of stratified random sampling assured objectivity and eliminated biases in the investigation. As a result, 30% of the study population was sampled, yielding a sample size of 113 from the three categories. Questionnaires were used to collect data from the sampled respondents. To address the study questions, the acquired data was analysed using descriptive analysis. According to the study, corporate governance can explain up to 20.5% of variations in a company's organizational performance. Although not statistically significant, there was a modest and positive relationship between board structure and organizational success. Stakeholder involvement and organizational performance had a statistically meaningful, albeit moderate, link. Board transparency and organizational success had a statistically meaningful, albeit moderate, link. A parastatal, improvements in KPLC’s performance would yield immense value to the public. The study recommended KPLC to appreciate and elevate the role of board committees to enhance the efficiency of the company and create better synchronization between the board other stakeholders such as the managerial team. 

Key Words:  Board Structure, Stakeholder Engagement, Transparency

CITATION: Muruu, S. M., & Njoroge, J. (2023). Influence of corporate governance practices on organization performance: case of Kenya Power & Lighting Company, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10 (2), 351 –367.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arosa, B., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2013). The board structure and firm performance in SMEs: Evidence from Spain. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección Y Economía de La Empresa, 19(3), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedee.2012.12.003

Emerson, R. W. (2018). MANOVA (Multivariate Analysis of Variance): An Expanded Form of the ANOVA (Analysis of Variance). Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(1), 125–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1811200113

Ihantola, E., & Kihn, L. (2011). Threats to validity and reliability in mixed methods accounting research. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111124694

INSEAD. (2019). Role of Boards in realizing organizational performance from inclusive diversity. In YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owaLO6Da4mQ

Isike, C., & Ajeh, A. (2017). Stakeholder Engagement as a Core Management Function: Analysing the Business Value of Stakeholder Engagement for Nigerian Business Organizations. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 9(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v9i1.1556

Kakanda, M. M., Salim, B., & Chandren, S. (2016). Review of the Relationship between Board Attributes and Firm Performance. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 8(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v8i1.9319

Kenyoru, N., D. (2015). Stakeholder Engagement and Organizational Performance: A Case of Kenya Power and Lighting Company, Eldoret Branch, Uasin-Gishu County – Kenya. Archives of Business Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.32.785

Langenbucher, K. C. (2012). Transparency of Board Composition – On a Mandatory Declaration of Strategy. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2176243

Lee, J., & Jungbae Roh, J. (2012). Revisiting corporate reputation and firm performance link. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(4/5), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771211258061

Lee, M. T., & Raschke, R. L. (2016). Understanding Employee Motivation and Organizational performance: Arguments for a set-theoretic Approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 1(3), 162–169. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.004

Ludbrook, J. (2012). A primer for biomedical scientists on how to execute Model II linear regression analysis. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 39(4), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2011.05643.x

Merendino, A., & Melville, R. (2019). The board of directors and firm performance: empirical evidence from listed companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(3), 508–551. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-06-2018-0211

Oino, I. (2019). Do disclosure and transparency affect bank’s financial performance? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, ahead-of- print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-12-2018-0378

Ortega-Rodríguez, C., Licerán-Gutiérrez, A., & Moreno-Albarracín, A. L. (2020). Transparency as a Key Element in Accountability in Non-Profit Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(14), 5834.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145834

Oswald, A. J., Proto, E., & Sgroi, D. (2015). Happiness and Productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(4), 789–822. https://doi.org/10.1086/681096

Peterson, R. S., & Gardner, H. K. (2022, September 28). Is Your Board Inclusive — or Just Diverse? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/09/is-your-board-inclusive- or-just-diverse

Saeidi, P., Robles, L. A. A., Saeidi, S. P., & Zamora, M. I. V. (2021). How does organizational leadership contribute to the firm performance through social responsibility strategies? Heliyon, 7(7), e07672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07672

Sciulli, N., & Adhariani, D. (2022). The use of integrated reports to enhance stakeholder engagement. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-11-2021-0156

Soppe, A., Van Zijl, N., & de Bos, A. (2010). Board Transparency, CEO Monitoring and Firms’ Financial Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal,1(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1621557

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5(3), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040

Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational Leadership and Performance Across Criteria and Levels: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Research. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 223–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111401017

Wartenberg, D. (2010). Multivariate Spatial Correlation: A Method for Exploratory Geographical Analysis. Geographical Analysis, 17(4), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1985.tb00849.x

Yadav, S. (2020). Determining the Relationship between Employee Engagement and Employee Satisfaction: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 5038–5048.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i2.2609

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.