EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN NAKURU COUNTY GOVERNMENT, KENYA

GRACE NJERI NGANGA, ABEL ANYIENI, PhD

Abstract


This study assessed the effect of performance appraisal on performance of employees in Nakuru County Government, Kenya. Descriptive research design was applied. The target population was 94 staffs of Nakuru County Government. The researcher used census study technique involving all the 94 purposively identified study respondents. The purposively selected respondents included all the county ministers, chief officers, sub county administrators, ward administrators and members of the county public service board. Primary and secondary data was considered. The researcher used questionnaires to collect primary data. The study examined that appraisal criteria, appraisal frequency, appraisal reward system and appraisal feedback had a positive significant influence on employee performance in Nakuru County Government, Kenya. In regard to appraisal criteria, the study concluded that the appraisal criteria are the aspects the employee is actually being evaluated on, which are tied directly to the employees’ job description. On appraisal frequency, the study concluded that by regularly reviewing and evaluating employee performance makes it easier to identify any skills gaps or areas where an employee may be struggling. On appraisal reward system, the study concluded that appraisal reward systems are a great way to identify areas where an employee may need additional training or support. On appraisal feedback, the study concluded that staff members provide feedback on how their team leads are doing. Providing feedback helps motivate employees to do well. In regard to appraisal criteria, the study recommended that the County should set clear goals, periodically discuss the progress made to control and debate on the feasibility of achieving those set objectives. On appraisal frequency, the study recommended that the frequency of appraisal feedback should be designed to be economical, less time-consuming to get maximum benefits and one that matches the needs of your organization. On appraisal reward system, the study recommended that the County should establish an assessment method, required competencies and job expectations need to be drafted for each employee and individual appraisals on employee performance should be conducted. On appraisal feedback, the study recommended that the County should appraisal feedback by involving the employee and making them feel like a valued part of the process.

Key Words: Appraisal Criteria, Appraisal Feedback, Appraisal Rewards, Appraisal Frequency, Appraisal Systems

CITATION: Nganga, G. N., & Anyieni, A. (2023). Employee performance appraisal system and employee performance In Nakuru County Government, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10 (2), 1295 – 1307.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, J. S., & Freedman, S. (1976). Equity theory revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 43–90.

Anderson, J. R. (2002). Measuring human capital: performance appraisal effectiveness. In Human Resource Track Midwest Academy of Management Conference. Kansas City: Missouri.

Cheeseman, N., Lynch, G., & Willis, J. (2016). Decentralisation in Kenya: the governance of governors. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 54(1), 1–35.

Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 473–487.

Gichuhi, A. W., Abaja, P. O., & Ochieng, I. (2013). Effect of Performance Appraisal on Employee Productivity: A Case Study of Supermarkets in Nakuru Town, Kenya. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 2(11), 42–58.

Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2011). Organizational behavior. Cengage Learning.

Guest, D. (2002). Human resource management, corporate performance and employee wellbeing: Building the worker into HRM. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 335–358.

Hecht, G., Hobson, J. L., & Wang, L. W. (2016). The Effect of Performance Reporting Frequency on Employee Performance. Retrieved from https://business.illinois.edu

Herzberg, F. I. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org

Hope, K. R. (2013). Performance contracting as a performance management tool in the public sector in Kenya: Lessons of learning. Teaching Public Administration, 31(2), 204–217.

Hornqren, C., Faster, G., & Datar, S. (2002). Cost Accounting: A managerial emphasis 11 Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.

Huitt, W. (2004). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Educational Psychology Interactive.

Hunt, N. (2005). Conducting Staff Appraisals: How to Set Up a Review System that Will Ensure Fair and Effective Appraisal-and Improve Individual Performance and Organisational Results. How to Books Ltd.

Kephas, O. B. (2016). Effect of Performance Appraisal on Employee Productivity in the Ministry of Agriculture Homa Bay County, Kenya. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(5), 289–304.

Kibe, J. kahugu. (2014, June 30). Relationship between performance appraisal and teacher commitment in Kenya (case study of public schools in Nakuru) (Project). Kenyatta University.

Latham, G. P. (2012). Work motivation: History, theory, research, and practice. Sage.

Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6), 881–905.

Mallaiah, T. Y. (2009). Management of employee expectations, performance and satisfaction in university library: an empirical study. Retrieved from http://nopr.niscair.res.in

Mani, B. G. (2002). Performance appraisal systems, productivity, and motivation: A case study. Public Personnel Management, 31(2), 141–159.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370.

Maslow, A. H. (1948). “Higher” and “Lower” Needs. The Journal of Psychology, 25(2), 433–436.

Muchiri, H. (2016). Effects of Rewards on Employee Performance in the Hospitality Industry: A Case of Nairobi Serena Hotel. United States International University-Africa. Retrieved from http://erepo.usiu.ac.ke/handle/11732/3174

Ndirangu, I. N., & Mbugua, D. (2016). Effects of appraisal system on employees ‘performance in water service boards in Kenya: A case study of Athi Water Service Board. Retrieved from http://www.ijssit.com

Obisi, C. (2011). Employee performance appraisal and its implication for individual and organizational growth. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(9), 92.

Odhiambo, E. O. (2015). The Effect of Performance Management Practices on Employee Productivity A Case Study of Schindler Limited. United States International University-Africa. Retrieved from http://erepo.usiu.ac.ke

Rudman, R. S. (2002). Human resources management in New Zealand. Prentice Hall.

Sajuyigbe, A. S. (2017). Impact of Performance Appraisal on Employee Performance in Nigerian Telecommunication Industry (A study of MTN, Nigeria). Retrieved from https://iiardpub.org

Scott, J. (2009). Performance appraisals that actually improvement performance. Career and Technical Education, 5(1), 22–25.

Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). Introduction to special topic forum: The future of work motivation theory. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379–387.

Stello, C. M. (2011). Herzberg’s two-factor theory of job satisfaction: An integrative literature review. In Unpublished paper presented at The 2011 Student Research Conference: Exploring Opportunities in Research, Policy, and Practice, University of Minnesota Department of Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development, Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved from http://www.cehd.umn.edu/olpd/research/studentconf/2011/stelloherzberg.pdf

Stone, R. (2002). Human Resource Management. Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons.

Vroom, V. (1964). Expectancy theory. Work and Motivation.

Williams, R. S. (2002). Managing employee performance: Design and implementation in organizations. Cengage Learning EMEA.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i2.2667

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.