CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF SELECTED SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES IN KENYA

DAVIS MWENDA GITARI, JEREMIAH KOORI, PhD

Abstract


This study aimed at investigating the effect of corporate governance practices on the financial performance of selected SMEs in Kenya. Subsequently the specific objectives steered this research project to determine the effects of board structure, CEO duality as well as audit committee on the financial performance of the selected SMEs in Kenya. The study adopted stakeholder theory, stewardship theory and resource dependency theory. The study looked at empirical review relevant to this research proposal. A descriptive research design was utilized. A target population of 165 directors and managers from the selected SMEs was the unit of analysis. The study targeted all the top level management of the selected SMEs in Kenya hence a census study was utilized to administer questionnaires to the respondent.  Secondary data was collected through the use of secondary data collection schedule. The questionnaire validity was tested using the supervisor and expert assessment and reliability was checked by use of Cronbach’s alpha. The collected data was probed for error then it was scrutinized using descriptive statistic by utilization of mean and standard deviation with the guidance of Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) software version 22 with and multiple regression analysis were used. A diagnostic test was conducted where a Shapiro Wilk test, Autocorrelation test and Multi-collinearity test was utilized. The collected data was analyzed and presented in form of charts, tables and graphs. Ethical considerations were observed. The study found that board structure had statistically insignificant effect on financial performance of SMEs. The study found that CEO duality had a positive and significant effect on financial performance of SMEs. The study found that audit committee had a positive and significant effect on financial performance. The study recommended that being a director on a board is a demanding job as a result of this duty, making the design of the function and make-up of the board of directors an essential task is critical.

Key Words: Corporate Governance, Board Structure, CEO Duality, Audit Committee

CITATION: Gitari, D. M., & Koori, J. (2023). Corporate governance practices and financial performance of selected small and medium enterprises in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10 (3), 46 – 60.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aduda J., Chogii R. & Magutu P. O. (2013). An Empirical Test of Competing Corporate Governance Theories on the Performance of Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange.

Donaldson, L., & Davis, J.H. (1991). Stewardship theory or Agency Theory: CEO governance and shareholder return. Australian Journal of Management, 16 (1).

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, London.

Hillman, A. &Dalziel, T. (2002), Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28 (3): 383-396.

Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Management behavior, agency costs and Capital Structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-60.

Ngugi, J & Bwisa, H. (2013). Factors influencing growth of group owned small and medium enterprises. A case of one village one product enterprises. International Journal of Education and Research. Vol. (8), 58-79.

Nyamongo, K. (2019). The Failure of Corporate Governance in State Owned Enterprises and The need for restructured governance in fully and partially privatized enterprises: The case of Kenya”. Fordham International Law Journal, 3(4), 1-31.

Tachiwou, A. M. (2016). Corporate governance on the performance of listed company in the West African Monetary Union (WAMU) regional financial exchange. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(8), 212-221.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i3.2687

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.