INVENTORY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF KENYA ANIMAL FEEDS INDUSTRY

DICKSON MOYWAYWA MOSES

Abstract


Animal feed manufacturing companies in Kenya have long been shrouded in mystery regarding their operational practices. The article delved into the secrets of successful animal feed manufacturing companies in Kenya in this groundbreaking research. The study examined how inventory management practices impact operational performance in the animal feed industry and aimed to uncover the inventory management practices used by the companies. A sample of 24 companies was selected using a reliable, simple random sampling method from a population of 79 companies. Both primary and secondary data were collected using a structured questionnaire, and descriptive statistics were employed for analysis. The study's results revealed some fascinating insights into the inventory management practices employed by animal feed manufacturers in Kenya. Just-In-Time and Economic Order Quantity were the most widely used inventory management practices, adopted by 28.1% and 26.6% of companies, respectively. Many companies also implemented Vendor Management Inventory and Material Requirement Planning at 23.4% and 21.9%, respectively. The study's most significant takeaway was that effective inventory management practices can significantly improve the operational performance of animal feed manufacturing companies. By adopting these practices, companies can enhance their production processes, reduce costs, and improve overall efficiency. The research provides valuable insights applicable to Kenya and other animal feed manufacturing industries. The study was a groundbreaking contribution to the body of knowledge on inventory management practices and their impact on operational performance. The findings provided vital information for animal feed manufacturers in Kenya and offered valuable lessons for companies in similar industries worldwide. By embracing effective inventory management practices, companies can gain a competitive edge, achieve optimal production levels, and streamline operations.

Keywords: Inventory management practices, Operational performance, Animal feeds industry

CITATION: Moywaywa, M. D. (2023). Inventory management practices and operational performance of Kenya animal feeds industry. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10 (2), 1518 – 1526.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aggarwal, R., & Ranganathan, P. (2019). Study designs: Part 2–descriptive studies. Perspectives in clinical research, 10(1), 34.

Boienko, O., & Susidenko, О. (2019). Market niche as a method of brand promotion. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(1), 15-20.

Caprarulo, V., Ventura, V., Amatucci, A., Ferronato, G., & Gilioli, G. (2022). Innovations for Reducing Methane Emissions in Livestock toward a Sustainable System: Analysis of Feed Additive Patents in Ruminants. Animals, 12(20), 2760.

Dell, C. J., Baker, J. M., Spiegal, S., Porter, S. A., Leytem, A. B., Flynn, K. C. ...& Kleinman, P. J. (2022). Challenges and opportunities for manure shed management across US dairy systems: Case studies from four regions. Journal of Environmental Quality, 51(4), 521-539.

Kaihlanen, A. M., Salminen, L., Flinkman, M., & Haavisto, E. (2019). Newly graduated nurses’ perceptions of a final clinical practicum facilitating transition: A qualitative descriptive study. Collegian, 26(1), 55-61.

Nattassha, R., Handayati, Y., Simatupang, T. M., & Siallagan, M. (2020). Understanding circular economy implementation in the agri-food supply chain: the case of an Indonesian organic fertilizer producer. Agriculture & Food Security, 9, 1-16.

Negash, D. (2020). Evaluation of Commercial Animal Feed Quality and Manufacturing Status in Ethiopia. Acta Scientific Nutritional Health, 4(2), 1–13.

Omondi, S. O. (2019). Small-scale poultry enterprises in Kenyan medium-sized cities. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies.

Oshchepkov, M., Tkachenko, S., & Popov, K. (2019). Synthesis and applications of fluorescent-tagged scale inhibitors in water treatment. A review. International Journal of Corrosion and Scale Inhibition, 8(3), 480-511.

Piñeiro, M. (2022). Changes in the livestock sector and animal nutrition: the Italian feed industry in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Historia agraria: Revista de agricultura e historia rural, (87), 129-160.

Puente-Rodríguez, D., van Laar, H., & Veraart, M. (2022). A circularity evaluation of new feed categories in the Netherlands squaring the circle: a review. Sustainability, 14(4), 2352.

Termeer, C., Feindt, P., Karpouzoglou, T., Poppe, K., Hofstede, G. J., Kramer, K.,….& Meuwissen, M. (2019). Institutions and the resilience of biobased production systems: the historical case of livestock intensification in the Netherlands. Ecology and Society, 24(4).

Vernooij, A. G., Veldkamp, T., & Ndambi, A. (2019). Insects for Africa: developing business opportunities for insects in animal feed in Eastern Africa (No. 1150). Wageningen Livestock Research.

Zdorovets, I. I., Kitaeva, O. V., Kitaev, Y. A., & Uzhik, V. F. (2020, August). Information and analytical support of cost control in animal feed production. In Russian Conference on Digital Economy and Knowledge Management (RuDEcK, 2020) (pp. 625-630). Atlantis Press.

Zheng, T., Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., Perona, M., & Zanardini, M. (2020). The impacts of Industry 4.0: a descriptive survey in the Italian manufacturing sector. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(5), 1085-1115.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i2.2714

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.