INFLUENCE OF REGIONAL TARIFF POLICY ON RWANDA’S INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY: A CASE OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

CYUSA UWIMANA JEANNETTE, JOSHUA OGUTU MILUWI, PhD, JANE MUNGA

Abstract


This study established the influence of regional tariff policy on its international relations in the East African community. This study was guided by spatial theory of trade. Descriptive research design was used to achieve the study objectives. The target population for this study constituted 184 officials of Rwanda’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation from whom a sample of 126 respondents was selected using stratified random sampling method. Data was collected using a questionnaire and was analyzed using descriptive, inferential and thematic content analysis techniques. Analyzed statistical data was presented using tables and charts while qualitative data was documented using narratives. This study concluded that regional tariff policy has a positive and significant effect on Rwanda’s International Relations in East African Community. From the findings, this study recommended that the government should encourage the reduction of tariff barriers among member states to promote regional integration and expand market access for Rwandan goods and services. This can be achieved through negotiations within the EAC's Common External Tariff (CET) framework.

Key Words: Regional Tariff Policy, International Relations, Trade Barriers

CITATION: Cyusa, U. J., Miluwi, J. O., & Munga, J. (2023). Influence of regional tariff policy on Rwanda’s international relations in the East African Community: A case of foreign affairs and international cooperation. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10 (3), 446 – 458. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i3.2717


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afman, E.R. and Maurel, M. (2010). Diplomatic relations and trade reorientation in transition countries: Advances and Applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Africa Center for Strategic Studies (2017). Refugee Flows Show Burundi Crisis Worsening. March. Available at: http://africacenter.org/spotlight/refugee-flows-show-burundi-crisis-worsening////stat

African Union, (2011). “BIAT – Boosting intra-African trade”. Available at https://au.int/en/ti/biat/about

Aggarwal, R., & Ranganathan, P. (2019). Study designs: Part 2 - Descriptive studies. Perspectives in clinical research, 10(1), 34–36.https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18.

Arvis, J., Yann, D., Ben, S., Chorthip, U., and Anasuya, R. (2016). “Trade Costs in the Developing World: 1996 –2010.” World Trade Review 15 (3), 51–744.

Bair, Jr (2014) Editor’s Introduction: Commodity Chains in and of the World-System, in: Journal of World-Systems Research, 20 (1), 1-10.

Baldwin, J. and Gu, W. (2004) Trade Liberalization: Export-Market Participation, Productivity Growth, and Innovation, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20(3): 372-92.

Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2017). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.

Beaudreau, B. C. (2011): Vertical Comparative Advantage, in: The International Trade Journal, 25 (3), 305-348.

Cadot, O. (2012). Non-tariff measures in Burundi: The way forward. Washington, The World Bank (background report to the DTIS update).

Cassim A, Lilenstein K, Oosthuizen M &Steenkamp F (2015). Informality and Inclusive Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Development Policy Research Group Policy Brief 15/44. World Bank

Craig, M. (2016). The political Economy of regional integration in Africa: The East African Community (EAC) Report

Crozet, M. &Trionfetti, F. (2013): Firm-level comparative advantage, in: Journal of International Economics, 91 (2), 321-328.

Ehnts, D. H. (2008): Foreign direct investments, linkages and spillovers in a new economic geography framework, Norderstedt: Books on Demand.

Flick, U. (Ed.). (2017). The Sage handbook of qualitative data collection. Sage.

Freiling, J. & Fichtner, H. (2010): Organizational Culture as the Glue between People and Organization: A Competence-based View on Learning and Competence Building, in: Zeitschriftfür Personal forschung, 24 (2), 152-172.

Freiling, J., Gersch, M. &Goeke, C (2008): On the Path towards a Competence based Theory of the Firm, in: Organization Studies, 29 (8-9), 1143-1164.

Helms, L. (2014). Global Political Leadership in The Twenty-First Century: Problems And Prospects. Contemporary Politics 20, 3 261-277. Academic Search Complete. Web.

Hill, C. (2001). International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies: New York.

Hoekman, B. and Zarrouk, J.I. (2009). Changes in Cross-Border Trade Costs in the Pan-Arab Free Trade Area, 2001-2008. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5031.

Kee, H.L., Nicita, A. & M. Olarreaga (2009). Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices; Economic Journal 119, 172-199.

Kibii, E, (2020). Why Kenya-US trade talks will cause disquiet in EAC. 7th February. Available at https://www.bilaterals.org/?why-kenya-us-trade-talks-will.

Kihumba, L. (2018). The effect of Kenya’s and Tanzania’s economic interests in the east African community (EAC) Between the Periods 1967-1977 and 2000-2016. Retrieved from http://erepo.usiu.ac.ke/handle/11732/17/browse?

Limao, N. (2006). Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the United States, American Economic Review, 96(3),896-914.

Mann, E.N. (2013). Commercial Diplomacy in International Business at Kenya High Commission in Kampala, Uganda: A Research Project Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Master of Business Administration, School of Business, University of Nairobi

Maru, D. (2013). Cooperation Among Nations: Europe, America and Non-Tarfiff Barriers toTrade, New York, Cornell University Press

MEAC (2014). Growth Beyond Rwanda’s Boarders: Seven Years of accession to the EAC. Integration Affairs, Ministry of the East African Community, Issue 9. 2014

Odusote A (2015). Integration of Regional Economic Communities as Panacea for Africa’s Economic Growth: Lessons from Comparative Models. ActaUniverstatis Danubius. 8(2): 138–156.

Peter, W. (2015). Fairness in International Trade and Investment: North American Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics.

Ranganathan, P., & Aggarwal, R. (2018). Study designs: Part 1–An overview and classification. Perspectives in clinical research, 9(4), 184.

Ricardo, D. (1817): On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London: Murray.

Richard, B.E. (2017). The Concert of Europe: A Fresh Look at an International System. World Politics 28(2), 159-174

Rihim, K. (2002). Absolute and Comparative Advantage: Ricardian Model. Department of Economics, Marshall Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824.

Sachs, J.D. & A. Warner. (2014). Economic reform and process of global integration, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 26(1), 1-118.

Sturgeon, T. & Gereffi, G. (2009): Measuring Success in the Global Economy: International Trade, Industrial Upgrading, and Business Function Outsourcing in Global Value Chains, in: Transnational Corporations, 18 (2), 1-35.

Sylvanus, K.A. (2016). Economic Diplomacy in Africa: The Impact of Regional Integration versus Bilateral Diplomacy on Bilateral Trade. EUI Working Paper MWP 2016/18

USAID (2022). Economic Growth and Trade. Retrieved from https://www.usaid.gov/east-africa-regional/economic-growth-and-trade

Uwineza, B. (2018). Conducted an Evaluative analysis of the compliance with the EAC-CMP: the cases of Rwanda and Tanzania. Retrieved from http://erepo.usiu.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11732/4531/

Wanjugu, T. B. (2019). The effect of EAC trade block on economic growth in Kenya. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/108123/




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i3.2717

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.