CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN KENYA

ESSERY NGATI IMBUYE, JULIUS MIROGA, PhD

Abstract


This study assessed the effect of credit risk management on financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. The study targeted a population of 200 employees within 43 commercial banks legally operating in Kenya as per the 2018 to 2022 annual reports by the CBK. However, the study specifically focused on 5 commercial banks with a specific target population of 108 employees in all the banks. The five specific banks were selected owing to their vast fame and long existence in the financial market and huge customer base. Questionnaires were the main data collection instruments and were used to source for the data. Internal consistency checks of data were performed using Cronbach’s alpha to check for the reliability of data. The reliability of the data was arrived at by using cronbach’s alpha. Financial performance on commercial banks was assessed in terms of return on assets. Data analysis was done using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The data collected was edited, coded and then analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential analysis. The inferential analysis performed included correlation and regression analysis. The study results showed that credit risk management has an inverse and significant impact on the performance of these commercial banks. The study concluded that banks had managed their liquidity and that bank earnings were positively influenced by higher interest rates. However, their performance was negatively influenced by high credit risk management arising from nonperforming loans and foreign currency exchange. This study recommended that commercial banks should have a proper methodology for the measurement, identification, and control of credit risk management. It is important that all banking ventures have a comprehensive risk mitigation process embedded within their operations and that this is subjected to appropriate board and upper management oversight. Commercial banks should also know the credit risk appetite of its key stakeholders such as directors and gauge appropriate responses to them. This study also recommended that all banks should explore more methods to enhance credit risk management capacities.

Key words: Credit Risk Management, Financial Risk Management, Financial Performance

CITATION: Imbuye, E. N., & Miroga, J. (2023). Credit risk management and financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10 (3), 597 – 607. http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i3.2728


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abid, F., &Mseddi, S. (2004).The impact of operating and financial leverages and intrinsic business risk on firm value. Available at SSRN 942029

Ahmed, N., Ahmed, Z., &Usman, A. (2011). Determinants of Performance: A case of life Insurance Sector of Pakistan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 61 (7), 123-128.

Akhtar, M. F., Ali, K., &Sadaqat, S. (2011). Liquidity risk management: a comparative study between conventional and Islamic banks of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(1), 35-44

Cavusgil, S. T., Knight, G., Riesenberger, J. R., Rammal, H. G., & Rose, E. L. (2014). International business. Pearson Australia.

Central Bank Annual Report, 2019 Available (https://www.centralbank.go.ke/uploads/cbk_annual_reports/665458124_Annual%2520Report%25202917%252018%2520low%2520resolution.pdf

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) (2004), Available (online) www.coso.org

Drehmann, M., & Nikolaou, K. (2013).Funding liquidity risk: definition and measurement. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), 2173-2182.

Fredrick, O. (2012). The impact of credit risk management on financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. DBA Africa Management Review, 3(1), 22-37.

Gatsi, J. G., Gadzo, S. G., &Akoto, R. K. (2013).Degree of Financial and Operating Leverage and Profitability of Insurance Firms in Ghana. International Business and Management, 7(2), 57-65.

Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992).Stakeholder‐agency theory. Journal of management studies, 29(2), 131-154.

Khrawish, H., Siam, W. Z., &Khrawish, A. H. (2011). Determinants of Islamic Bank Profitability: Evidence from Jordan. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, (13), 43-57.

Kithinji, A. M. (2010). Credit risk management and profitability of commercial banks in Kenya. School of Business, University of Nairobi, Nairobi.

Klimczak, K. M. (2005). Rationales for corporate risk management from stakeholders’ perspective.

Mugenda, O. M. &Mugenda Ag (2003). Research Methods, Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.

Nimalathasan, B., &Pratheepkanth, P. (2012). Systematic Risk Management and Profitability: A Case Study of Selected Financial Institutions in Sri Lanka. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(17).

Ogol, G. O. (2011). Liquidity risk management practices in micro-finance institutions in Kenya (Unpublished Masters project). University of Nairobi, Kenya

Said, R. M. (2014).Net Stable Funding Ratio and Commercial Banks Profitability. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 76, 34

Searle, I. (2008).Enterprise Risk Management. London: Spiramus Press.,

Shukla, S. (2016).Analysis of banking system performance of select global economies with that of India–during and after the global financial. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 383-395.

Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1988). A probability model of the coincident economic indicators.

Tseng, C. Y. (2007). Internal control, enterprise risk management, and firm performance.ProQuest.

Wachiaya, J. (2011). A survey of market risk management techniques by commercial banks in Kenya and their suitability in mitigating financial loss (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi, Kenya).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i3.2728

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.