E-GOVERNMENT AND SERVICE DELIVERY IN TAITA TAVETA COUNTY GOVERNMENT, KENYA

ZUHURA REHEMA, PERIS KOECH, PhD

Abstract


Despite the application of ICTs in Governments, issues of Government efficiency, effectiveness, public service delivery, promotion of good governance and enhancement of democracy have been of concern in most Governments. E-Government adoption is a reform that has the potential to mound Kenya’s public sector pitfalls and especially in the County Governments. The main objective of this study was to establish the effect of E-government on service delivery at the County Government of Taita Taveta. The study used Diffusion of Innovations theory, Meta theory, theory of Change, Technology Acceptance model, Expectancy – Disconfirmation theory and Efficiency theory. Descriptive research technique was used for this study and the population of interest was 118 employees at the County Government of Taita Taveta from IT department, finance and procurement. Yamane formula was employed to come up with 92 respondents. Questionnaire was used to obtain primary data and was in the form of likert scales questions. The study did a pilot study of 9 employees from County Government of Taita Taveta. Data analysis was done with the use of SPSS and Microsoft excel and presented using percentages, tabulations, means and other central tendencies. Correlation analysis, regression analysis and analysis of variance were used to test for the significance of the model. The results were presented by the use of tables. Electronic Government, Electronic Citizen, Electronic Business and Electronic Employee have significant effect on service delivery at the County Government of Taita Taveta. The study recommends that E-Government services should be designed with the user in mind and concise instructions for each step of the process. The study recommended that the E-Citizen platform can be improved by simplifying the user interface to make it more user-friendly. The county government can increase awareness of the e-Citizen platform by launching awareness campaigns through various media channels. The County government should offer online training programs that enable employees to learn new skills and improve their performance. The study also recommends that the County government should invest in strong cybersecurity measures to ensure the safety and security of citizens data.

Key terms: E-Business, E-Citizen: E-Citizen, E-Employee, E- government, Service delivery

CITATION: Zuhura, R., & Koech, P. (2023). E- government and service delivery in Taita Taveta County Government, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10 (4), 866 – 881. http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i4.2791


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abasilim, U., &Edet, L. (2015). E-Governance and Its Implementation Challenges in the Nigerian Public Service. Act a Universitatis Danubius, 7(1), 37-81.

Adaku, E., Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Famiyeh, S. (2018). Improving public sector service delivery: a developing economy experience. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2(4), 56-78.

Adeyemo, A. (2018). E-Government implementation in Nigeria: An assessment of Nigeria's global e-gov ranking. Journal of Internet and Information System, 2(1), 11-19.

Ahmad, M. (2018). Review of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in internet banking and mobile banking. International Journal of Information Communication Technology and Digital Convergence, 3(1), 23-41.

Ajzen, I., &Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 12(5), 389-412.

Almarabeh, T., &AbuAli, A. (2010). The maturity models of E-Government development: A General Framework for E-Government. European Journal of Scientific Research, 39(1), 29-42.

Alzaydi, Z. M., Al-Hajla, A., Nguyen, B., & Jayawardhena, C. (2018). A review of service quality and service delivery. Business Process Management Journal, 2(4), 48-81.

Androutsopoulou, A., Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. (2019). Transforming the communication between citizens and Government through AI-guided chatbots. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 358-367.

Ashaye, O. O. R. (2018). Evaluating the implementation of E-Government in developing countries: The case of Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University Brunel Business School PhD Theses).

Ashaye, O. R., &Irani, Z. (2019). The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-Government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management, 4(9), 253-270.

Asiligwa, M. U. (2016). Adoption of E-Governance in the Public Sector: a Case of Nairobi City County. Unpublished Master of Arts Thesis in Public Policy and Administration), Kenyatta University.

Bekkers V. & Meijer, A. (2012). “A Meta‐Theory of E‐Government.” EGPA, Bergen (NO) (September 5 – 7). Permanent Study group on E‐Government.

Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2009). Rethinking governance: The centrality of the state in modern society. Cambridge University Press.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. Management Information Systems, pp. 351-370.

Bradwell, P., & Marr, S. (2017). Making the most of collaboration an international survey of public service co-design. Annual Review of Policy Design, 5(1), 1-27.

Brest P. (2010)."The Power of Theories of Change". Stanford Social Innovation Review. Spring.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Campbell, J., McDonald, C., &Sethibe, T. (2010). Public and private sector IT governance: Identifying contextual differences. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 36-41.

Cannon, B. J., & Ali, J. H. (2018). Devolution in Kenya Four Years On: A Review of Implementation and Effects in ManderaCounty. African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review, 8(1), 1-28.

Chuang, L. M., Liu, C. C., & Kao, H. K. (2016). The adoption of fintech service: TAM perspective. International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences, 3(7), 1-15.

Chung, C. S., & Kim, S. B. (2019).A Comparative Study of Digital Government Policies, Focusing on E-Government Acts in Korea and the United States. Electronics, 8(11), 1362.

Clark H., &Taplin D. (2012).Theory of Change Basics: A Primer on Theory of Change (PDF). New York: Acknowledge.

Clark, B. Y., &Brudney, J. L. (2019).Citizen representation in city Government-driven crowdsourcing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 28(5), 883-910.

Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2013). Business Research Methods (12thed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

CountyGovernment of Taita Taveta Integrated Development Plan (2018).

Curristine, T., Lonti, Z., &Joumard, I. (2007). Improving public sector efficiency: Challenges and opportunities. OECD journal on budgeting, 7(1), 1-41.

Davis, F. D. (1989, September). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly, 13 (3) , pp. 319–340.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., &Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, Volume 35 , 982-1003.

Dewa, M., &Zlotnikova, I. (2014). Citizens’ readiness for e-Government services in Tanzania. Advances in Computer Science: An International Journal, 3(4), 37-45.

E-Government in the UK Report (2014).Retrieved from https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/2014-06/eGov%20in%20UK%20May%202014%20v.16.0.pdf.

Elenezi, H., Tarhini, A., & Al-Qirim, N. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of e-Government in Kuwait: A qualitative study. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 15(2), 84.

Erik, M., & Marko, S. (2017).A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics. New York: Springer Heidlegerg Dordrecht.

Gore, A. (1993). From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less. New York: Times Books.

Gwary, M. M., Asindaya, Z., & Abba, M. A. (2016). Public-private partnership as panacea for effective extension service delivery: Review of experience and potential in Nigeria. Net Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(3), 50-55.

Haniff, Z. (2006). E-Government implementation in Malaysia: A comparison of Malaysia’s and Korea’s E-Government. A Thesis Submitted to School of Public Policy and Management, KDI in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Public Policy.

Hassan, A. M. (2019). Effect of E-Government on Service Delivery in the Public Service of Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT-COHRED).

Heeks, R., &Bailur S. (2007). Analyzing E‐Government Research: Perspectives, Philosophies, Theories, Methods and Practice, Government Information Quarterly 24 (2) pp. 243 ‐ 265.

Kalra, D. (2019). Applications, Models and Uses of Data Mining in E-Governance for Sustainable Development. In Proceedings of the 7 th International Research Symposium of the SGBED (pp. 263-272).

Kasiri, L. A., Cheng, K. T. G., Sambasivan, M., &Sidin, S. M. (2017). Integration of standardization and customization: Impact on service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 3(5), 91-97.

Kharel, S. (2018).Public service delivery of local Government in Nepal in 2015. Research Nepal Journal of Development Studies, 1(1), 83-93.

Kimenyi, M. (2013).‘Devolution and Resource Sharing in Kenya’, Brookings Opinion, www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2013/10/22-devolution-resource-sharing-kenya-kimenyi.

Kombo, D. K., & Tromp, D. L. (2016). Proposal and thesis writing, an introduction. Pauline’s publication. Nairobi, Kenya.

Kothari, G. (2014). Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems, Business Process Management Journal, 7 (3), 285.

Kuk, G. (2003). The digital divide and the quality of electronic service delivery in local Government in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 353-363.

Lankton, N. K., & Macknight, H. D. (2012). Examining Two Expectation Disconfirmation Theory Models: Assimilations and Asymmetry Effects.Journal of the Association for Information Systems Vol.13 Issue 2 , 88-115.

Lee-Geiller, S., & Lee, T. D. (2019). Using Government websites to enhance democratic E-governance: A conceptual model for evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 208-225.

Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 40(3), 191-204.

Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information and Management 40 , 191-204.

Mahundu, F. G. (2017). E-Governance in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the Central Admission System in Tanzania (Doctoral dissertation, Rhodes University).

Maslow, A. (1954). Mortivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.

Meijer, A. & Zouridis, S. (2006). E‐Government is an Institutional Innovation. In: V. Bekkers, H. van Duivenboden & M. Thaens, Information and Communication technology and Public Innovation. Assessing the ICT‐Driven Modernization of Public Administration, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 219 – 229.

Mishra, S. S., & Geleta, A. T. (2020). Can an E-Government System Ensure Citizens’ Satisfaction without Service Delivery?. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(3), 242-252.

Mouzas, S. (2006). Efficiency versus effectiveness in business networks. Journal of Business Research, 59(10-11), 1124-1132.

Mungai, A. N. (2017). E-Government strategy implementation and performance of the public sector in Kenya. International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, 2(3), 301-38.

Muraya, B. (2015). Factors affecting successful adoption of e-Government in Kenya’s public sector. A Project Submitted to United States International University Africa.

Mutuku, J. M., &Machyo, P. (2017). Factors influencing the implementation of e-Government policies in Nakuru County, Kenya. American Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 1(1).

Ndou V. (2004) “E-Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges.” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries. Vol. 18.

Ochara, N. M. (2010). Assessing irreversibility of an E-Government project in Kenya: Implication for governance. Government Information Quarterly, 27(1), 89-97.

Okong’o, K., &Kyobe, M. (2018). Empirical examination of e-Government in developing countries and its value in Kenya’s public service. Electronic Journal of Governance 21(1), 35-45.

Oliver, R. L. (1977). Effect of Expectation and Disconfirmation on Postexposure Product Evaluations - an Alternative Interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4) , 480.

Omwamba Masenge, D., &Chewa, J. (2019). E-Governance and its Interventions to Effective Public Service Delivery in Kenya. International journals of academics & research Humanities & Social Sciences JournalVol. 2, Issue, 261-304.

Orodho, J. (2014). Techniques for Writing Research Projects and Reports in Education and the Social Sciences. Nairobi: Masola Publishers.

Peacock, A. T., & Wiseman, J. (2009). Approaches to the analysis of Government expenditure growth. Public Finance Quarterly, 7(1), 3-23.

Pereira, G. V., Macadar, M. A., Luciano, E. M., &Testa, M. G. (2017). Delivering public value through open Government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 213-229.

Reddy, M. R. (2019). Challenges for e-governance in and hrapradesh–a holistic view. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(1), 735.

Republic of Kenya (2018). E-Government strategy: The strategic framework, administrative structure, training Requirements and standardization framework. Nairobi: Government Printer.

Rogers, E.M., (1995): Diffusion of innovation (4th ed.) New York: The Free Press.

Rohilla, R. (2014, September 2). E-Governance. Retrieved on July 12, 2015, from

http://www.slideshare.net/ravirohilla10/e-governance-

?from_action=save

Rokhman, A. (2017). E-Government Adoption in Developing Countries; the Case of Indonesia. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information sciences, 2(5), 228-233.

Rosenau, J. N. (2017). Globalisation and governance: sustainability between fragmentation and integration. In Governance and Sustainability (pp. 20-38). Routledge.

Salam, M. A. (2013). E-governance for good governance through public service delivery: an assessment of district e-service centres in Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation, BRAC University).

Salam, M. A. (2017). E-governance for good governance: Experiences from public service delivery. Journal of E-governance, 7(3), 26-29.

Sarker, M. N. I., Wu, M., Liu, R., & Ma, C. (2018). Challenges and opportunities for information resource management for E-governance in Bangladesh. In International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (pp. 675-688).Springer, Cham.

Scott, G. K. (2019). Effects of Public Expenditure Management Practices on Service Delivery in the Public Sector: The Case of District Assemblies in Ghana. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 9(2), 71-92.

Shaikh, A. Z., Shah, U. L., & Wijekuruppu, C. (2016). Public service delivery and e-governance: The case of Pakistan. International Journal for Infonomics, 9(2), 1161-1170.

Siddiquee, N. A. (2019). Driving performance in the public sector: what can we learn from Malaysia’s service delivery reform? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2(4), 126-171.

Sigwejo, A., &Pather, S. (2016). A citizen‐centric framework for assessing e‐Government effectiveness. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 74(1), 1-27.

Sulehat, N. A., &Taib, C. A. (2016). E-Government information systems interoperability in developing countries. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 2(1), 49-60.

Taplin, D., Clark, H., Collins, E., & Colby, D. (2013). Technical Papers: A Series of

Papers to support Development of Theories of Change Based on Practice

in the Field (PDF). New York: Acknowledge and The Rockefeller Foundation.

United Nations (2008). UN E-Government Survey 2008.Retrieved on July 18, 2015, from

http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan028607.pdf.

Vankatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 425- 478.

Venkatesh, V., &Bala, M. (2008). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies; management Science, Volume, 46(2).

Wangwe, C. K., Eloff, M. M., & Venter, L. (2012). A sustainable information security framework for e-Government–case of Tanzania. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(1), 117-131.

Waseem, A. A., &Shaikh, Z. A. (2019). E-Governance Service System Readiness Assessment Framework from CSCW’s Perspective. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 38(1), 53-68.

West, D. M. (2004). E‐Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public administration review, 64(1), 15-27.

Yampolskiy, R. V. (2013). Efficiency theory: A unifying theory for information, computation and intelligence. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 16(4-5), 259-277.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i4.2791

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.