THE ROLE OF FARMER GROUPS IN THE ADOPTION OF SUSTAINABLE SUGARCANE FARMING PRACTICES IN KAKAMEGA NORTH SUB-COUNTY

EDITH NAKHONE WANJALA, ALICE CHESAMBU NDIEMA, PhD, LEVI SHADEYA AKUNDABWENI, PhD

Abstract


This study evaluated the role of farmer groups in the adoption of sustainable sugarcane farming practices among smallholder farmers in Kakamega North Sub-County. The research targeted all seven wards, covering a population of 65,323 sugarcane smallholder farmers, with a sample size of 394. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and interviews with key informants. Findings revealed that 95% of farmers were not members of farmer groups. Significant associations were observed between membership in farmer groups and the adoption of sustainable practices such as weeding (p ≤ 0.001) and soil testing (p ≤ 0.001). These results underscore the importance of farmer groups in facilitating access to knowledge, extension services, and collective action in promoting sustainable sugarcane farming. Strengthening and expanding farmer organizations could therefore play a critical role in scaling up sustainable practices among smallholder farmers in the region.

Key Words: Farmer Groups, Adoption of Sustainable Sugarcane Farming Practices, Kakamega North Sub-County

CITATION: Wanjala, E. N., Ndiema, A. C., & Akundabweni, L. S. (2025). The role of farmer groups in the adoption of sustainable sugarcane farming practices in Kakamega North Sub-County. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 12 (2), 1458 – 1470. http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v12i2.3284


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ambetsa, W., Lutta, S., & Wabomba, D. (2020). Overview of sugarcane production in Sub-Saharan Africa: Trends and implications. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 15(3), 135–144.

Daniels, C., & Daniels, T. (1993). The environmental impact of sugarcane production. Environmental Management, 17(2), 235–247.

Formann, R., Singh, P., & Ndemo, E. (2020). Sustainable utilization of sugarcane by-products: A case for ethanol and bagasse. Renewable Energy Journal, 45(1), 19–27.

Francis, M., Otieno, G., & Awuor, B. (2020). Determinants of adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices among sugarcane farmers in Kenya. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability, 12(4), 66–78.

Hess, T., Morris, J., & Johnson, C. (2016). Sugarcane production trends in Africa: A five-country comparison. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2(2), 34–41.

Khaemba, M. N., Barasa, D. K., & Omondi, J. (2022). The impact of sugarcane farming on the rural economy of Kenya: A case of Western Kenya. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 14(5), 89–98.

Kombo, L., Wekesa, T., & Mukopi, T. (2022). Challenges facing the sugarcane sector in Western Kenya: A sustainability perspective. Kenya Journal of Agribusiness and Policy, 8(1), 44–55.

Nanjala, A., Wanyonyi, S., & Chemoiwa, A. (2022). Sugarcane farming patterns and socio-economic impacts in Kakamega County, Kenya. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 24(1), 56–71.

Ndung’u, M. (2023). Landholding sizes and sugarcane productivity among small-scale farmers in Kenya. Agricultural Research and Development Review, 11(2), 112–119.

Som-Ard, J., Wongsuwan, P., & Chen, L. (2021). Sugarcane production and processing: A comparative study of Asia’s leading producers. Journal of Asian Agricultural Science, 9(3), 78–86.

Voora, V., Larrea, C., & Bermudez, S. (2023). Sugarcane: Global market trends and sustainability issues. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). Retrieved from https://www.iisd.org/publications

Voor, R., Choi, Y., & Oliveira, D. (2023). Global sugarcane dynamics and energy diversification. Global Agriculture and Renewable Energy Reports, 7(2), 22–29.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v12i2.3284

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 12, No 2 [2025]Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
Vol 12, No 1 [2025] Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
. Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
. Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.