FACTORS AFFECTING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN EFFECTIVE DEVOLVED GOVERNANCE IN KENYA: A CASE OF UASIN GISHU COUNTY

CAROLYN WACUKA GITEGI

Abstract


This study sought to determine the factors affecting public participation in effective devolved governance in Uasin Gishu County. The study targeted 105 residents of Uasin Gishu County who were chosen using stratified random sampling and the County Transitional Authority Coordinator. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data from the residents, key informant interviews from the county government official. The data was analysed using the descriptive statistics that were generated by use of Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). The presentation of data was in the form of tables and figures for showing comparisons, trends and clarity for easy understanding of the findings. The findings of the study showed that public participation was affected by the level of access to information by citizens; citizen’s awareness levels on public participation and accountability of county governments to public needs. The study concluded that: The County government of Uasin Gishu provide information to its citizens however the channels used were not convenient due to poor timing and improper use of channels; Awareness levels among Uasin Gishu County residents was very low as majority of them thought that they had no role to play in the county government; had not received any training on public participation; and were not familiar with enactments guiding public participation in devolved governance; The Uasin Gishu County government was not accountable to the needs of its residence as most of the projects undertaken were not reflective of the needs of the county residents; majority of the residents had not been involved in public forums and those involved felt that their opinions were not taken seriously. Based on the findings, this study recommended that Uasin Gishu County government established an ICT-resource centre where citizens could be able to access government information; creates awareness through massive public awareness on public participation campaigns through radio, television and public gatherings; capacity build its residents on public participation through training; and hold public forums at ward levels to reach out to more citizens. Finally the study recommended further research in other counties on the impact of public participation in devolved governance.

Key Words: Acess to Information, Citizen Awareness, Accountability, Public Partcipation, Effective Governance


Full Text:

PDF

References


Azfar, O., Kahkonen, S. and Meagher, P. (2001) ‘Conditions for Effective Decentralized Governance: A Synthesis of Research Findings’, College Park, University of Maryland, IRIS Center, Working Paper No. 256.

Baswony, C. (2014).How County government communic ates with citizens: Opportunities and challenges.Transparency International Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya.

CRECO. (2014). Model Policy Framework for Public Participation in County Governments. Constitution and Reform Education Consortium, Nairobi Kenya.

Chitere, O. &Ireri, O. (2004). District focus for rural development in Kenya: its limitations as a decentralisation and participatory planning strategy and prospects for the future. Institute of Policy Analysis and Research. Nairobi, Kenya.

Devas, N. and Grant, U., (2003). Local Government Decision-Making—Citizen Participation And Local Accountability: Some Evidence From Kenya And Uganda. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pad.281/pdf on 26th/10/2015.

IEA. (2014). First County Integrated Development Planning: Experiences and Lessons from Laikipia, Nandi, UasinGishu, and MeruCounties.Institute of Economic Affairs. Nairobi Kenya.

IEA. (2015). Review of status of Public Participation, and County Information Dissemination Frameworks: A Case Study of Isiolo Kisumu Makueni and Turkana Counties. Institute of Economic Affairs. Nairobi, Kenya.

Hilmer, J.D. (2010).The State of Participatory Democratic Theory, New Political Science. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, England.

Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) &Social and Public Accountability Network (SPAN). (2010). Harmonization of Decentralized Development in Kenya: Towards Alignment, Citizen Engagement and Accountability. KHRC &SPAN.

KSG. (2015).Building Public Participation in Kenya’s Devolved Government: Overview of key challenges and opportunities for enhancing participation in newly Devolved institutions and systems; Kenya School of Government Working Paper Series 1.

Khisa, J. (2015). County assembly invites public participation on Finance, Emergency Fund Bills. Retrieved from http://www.hivisasa.com/uasin-gishu on 23/10/2015.

Legal Resources Foundation Trust. (2009).Proposed Policy on Community Participation in the Governance of Devolved Funds.LRTF,Nairobi:Kenya.

Lubale, G. (2012). An Introduction to the County Governments of Kenya. Nairobi; Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology.

Ministry of Local Government. (2009).Guidelines for the Preparation, Implementation and Monitoring of the Local Authority Service Delivery Action Plan. Nairobi, Kenya.

Ministry of Devolution and Planning. (2016). County Public Participation Guidelines. Nairobi; Government Printer.

Moseti, Y. (2010). Public Participation for Sustainable Development in Local Cities. 46th ISOCARP Congress, Nairobi, Kenya.

Muiru, A.M. (2013). Decentralization, citizen participation and local public service delivery: A study on the nature and influence of citizen participation on decentralized service delivery in Kenya. University of Potsdam.

Mugenda, O.M &Mugenda, A.G. (2009).Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches; Acts Press: Nairobi, Kenya.

Omollo, A. (2010). Policy Proposals on Citizen Participation in Devolved Governance n Kenya. The Institute For Social Accountability (TISA). Nairobi, Kenya.

Omolo, A. (2009). Baseline Survey Report on Governance in the Greater Turkana Region. Nairobi: Oxfam GB (unpublished).

Oyugi, N. and Kibua, T. N. (2006).Planning and Budgeting at the Grassroots Level: The Case of Local Authority Service Delivery Action Plans. IPAR, Nairobi: Kenya.

Okello, M., Oenga, I. &Chege P. (2008).Participatory Urban Planning Toolkit Based on the Kitale Experience: A guide to Community Based Action Planning for Effective Infrastructure and Services Delivery. Practical Action: Nairobi, Kenya.

Odhiambo, M. and Taifa, A. (2009) Devolved Funds Development: A Handbook on Participation. Claripress: Nairobi, Kenya.

Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Robinson, (2007). Does decentralization improve equity and efficiency in public service delivery provision?IDS Bulletin. Volume 38. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2007.tb00333.x/pdf On 26th October 2015.

GoK . (2010). The Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Government Printer. Nairobi, Kenya.

GoK. (2012).The County Government Act, 2012. Government Printer. Nairobi, Kenya.

GoK. (2012). The Public Finance Management Act, 2012. Nairobi, Kenya.

TI. (2014). Low public awareness and participation undermining devolution. Transparency International Kenya. Retrieved from http://www.tikenya.org/index.php/blog on 23/10/2015.

UN-HABITAT (2004). Urban Governance toolkit Series.

UGCG. (2013). UasinGishu County Integrated Development Plan 2013-2017.Eldore, Kenya.

Yang, K and Callahan, K. (2005). Assessing Citizen Involvement Efforts by Local Governments. Public Performance and Management Review Vol 29 (2).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v3i4.381

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.