EFFECTS OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION TOOLS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF WIRELESS NETWORK PROJECTS IN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING IN KENYA: A CASE STUDY OF JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY HALLS OF RESIDENCE

Esther Wairimu Gichaiya

Abstract


Implementation of Wireless network projects in an Information and Communication Technology (ICT) context encompasses all the processes involved in getting anew project operating properly, making necessary changes and achieving the intended goal. This study focuses on the effect of monitoring and evaluation tools in the implementation of Wireless network implementation in institutions of higher learning in particular JKUAT. A descriptive study design was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data. The target population of this study was on all students and staff in JKUAT Halls of Residence, management, and the JKUAT, ICT technicians.  Systematic Random sampling was applied.  Primary data was collected by use of both closed and open ended questionnaires. Secondary data was collected form the JKUAT, ICT directorate, records office. The data collected from the field was captured using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The Results revealed that monitoring and evaluation contributed to working within the expected timeframe in order to achieve positive results. Assessment revealed that Wireless network project facilitated the respondents with network and internet connectivity in a positive way. In general, from the findings, the institutions can gain full benefit of the project when monitoring and evaluation facet is emphasized. Monitoring and evaluation was positively significant in the implementation of wireless network projects. A more detailed study can be conducted to establish the other factors that contribute towards the implementation of Wireless projects in institutions of higher learning.

Key Words: Monitoring and Evaluation, Implementation of Wireless Network, Higher Learning Institutions


Full Text:

PDF

References


Baraza, R. M., (2014). Influence of monitoring and evaluation tools on project Completion in Kenya: a case of constituency development fund projects in Kakamega County, Kenya

Ford, D. N., & Sterman, J. D. (2003). Overcoming the (90% Syndrome: Iteration Management in concurrent Development Projects. Concurrent Engineering, 11(3), 177-186.

Friedman A. L., Miles S. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press. .

Gardiner, P. D. (2005). Project Management: A Strategic Planning Approach. Palgrave Macmillan.

Gerring, J. (2004). What Is a Case study and What Is It Good for? American Political Science Review, 98(02)

Görgens-Albino, M., & Kusek, J. Z. (2009). Making Monitoring and Evaluation Systems Work: A Capacity Development Toolkit. World Bank Publications.

Hall, R. (2001). Prototyping for Usability of New Technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, pp. 485±501.

Hage, M., Leroy, P., & Petersen, A. C. (2010). Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production. Futures, 42(3), 254–264.

Kamau, C. G. & Mohamed, H. B., (2015). Efficacy of Monitoring and Evaluation Function in Achieving Project Success in Kenya: A Conceptual Framework. Science Publishing Group. Kenya.

Kariuki, E., Nyambura, P., Ndoneh, J. (2013). Kenya ICT Board progress report 2007-13. Nairobi.

Kibera, G., (2013). Assessment of Stakeholders Participation in the Implementation of Information and Communication Technology Software Projects: A Case of Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology. Kenya

Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten Steps to a Results-based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Handbook for Development Practitioners. World Bank Publications.

Leisyte, I., Westerheijden, D.F. (2014). "Stakeholders and Quality Assurance in Education". In Eggins, Heather. Drivers and Barriers to Achieving Quality in Higher Education

Maina B.M., (2013). Influence of stakeholders’ participation on the success of the Economic stimulus programme: a case of education projects in Nakuru County. Kenya

Malaiarisoon, S. (2012). Lessons learned from Shore Base Project in Thailand: Stakeholder engagement and public participation. In Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE/APPEA Int. Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production 2012: Protecting People and the Environment - Evolving Challenges (Vol. 2, pp. 1350–1360).

Mitchell R., Agle B. R., Wood D. J., (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review.

Mouna, J., & Jean, M. S. (2014). ICT acceptation: The case of CRM project. University of Poitier.

Mugenda, O.M. and Mugenda, A.G. (2003). Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantative Approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.

McIntyre, A. (2008b). Participatory Action Research. SAGE Publications.

Naimoi, C. K. (2008). An analysis of the factors influencing successful Implementation of projects: the case study of world bank funded Projects in Kenya. University of Nairobi.

Nair, P. (2002). The Role of Wireless Computing Technology in the Design of Schools. NCEF publications. Washington, D.C.

Njau, J. N. (2012). Factors influencing implementation of the African Development Bank funded project in the ministry of higher education, science and technology - kenya. University of Nairobi.

Oteyo, A. I., (2014). Factors Affecting Implementation of Software Engineering Projects: A case study of the Kenya ICT Authority. Kenya

Seffah, A. (2009). Establishing Usability Function in Organization: Pitfalls and Obstacles for Integration. Concordia University.

Shurie, Y. B. (2013). Community factors that influence monitoring and evaluation of Constituency development fund projects in Dujis, constituency –Garissa County. University of Nairobi.

Sterman, J. (1992). Systems Dynamics modelling for project management. working paper available from John Sterman(Vol. 1951). Cambridge, Mass.

Schwalbe, K. (2008), Introduction to Project management, 2nd Edition.

Walliman, N. (2011). Your Research Project: Designing and Planning Your Work. SAGE Publications.

Wagner, Daniel A., Bob Day, Tina James, Robert B. Kozma, Jonathan Miller and Tim Unwin (2005). Monitoring and Evaluation of ICT in Education Projects: A Handbook for Developing Countries. Washington, DC

Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action Research: Living Theory. SAGE.

White, K. L., Chaubey, I., & Costello, T. A. (2003). Stakeholder involvement in watershed management lessons learned. Total Maximum Daily Load (Tmdl): Environmental Regulations Ii, Proceedings, 46–50.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v3i4.385

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.