ROLE OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMPETENCE IN SUPPLY CHAIN AGILITY IN SERVICE INDUSTRY CASE OF TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF KENYA

Judith Wasike

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between information systems and supply chain agility in service industry.  Using a sample of 96 (N= 96) top, middle and lower level staff of the Technical University of Kenya and a case study design, the research is conducted through interviews and survey by use of interview guides and  questionnaires to collect data from the respondents. Interviews were carried out with top management in the supply chain and surveys from both the middle and lower level managers across Information systems and supply chain management –related departments. The data collected was analysed descriptively and inferentially using regression and confirmatory factors analyses through the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. The study was augmented by investigating the role of IS competence to achieve supply chain agility. A gap noted and filled by the study is that as to date most of the published literature in this stream of research has mainly focused on manufacturing industry leaving out the service industry. This research was an attempt to examine and analyze the use and value of IT enabled capabilities to promote supply chain agility in service industry.  Agility capabilities are the strengths the firm needs in order to respond to the environment that are enabled through the agility providers of the organizations, people, technology and innovation. The study findings concurred with the views of most scholars that Information Systems (IS) have rapidly reshaped business processes and supply chain agility as an operational strategy, has been especially affected. From the F statistic test value of 26.551 and a small significance value of 0.000 that is P = 0.000 > α = 0.05, indicates that there is a regression relationship between the dependent variable (supply chain agility) and the predictor variables.  For instance the study supports the importance of information systems service competence based on low response time to IS problems  to enhance speed and efficiency and management  skills based on network management enhancing collaborative abilities, data centre management  to enhance virtual integration and contributing to quick   service delivery in the context of supply chain agility. The R Square value of 0.956 shows that the variables account for 95.6% of the change in supply chain agility. From findings it can be concluded that IT Service Competence affects supply chain agility more in the institution followed by IT Services Management Skills as measured by the various items under each predictor.

Keywords: Information Systems Competence, Supply Chain Agility, Information Systems, Service Industry


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agarwal, R. and Sambamurthy,V. (2002) Principles and models for organizing the IT function. MIS Quarterly Executive 1 (10), pp.1-6.

Atieno, Ndede Amadi (2013). Information systems education in Kenya: Students’ specialization choice trends (a case study of Kenya Polytechnic University College) International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2013, Vol. 9 (3), pp. 137-161.

Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A., and Yin, F. (2001). "Measures for E-Business Value Assessment,"IEEE IT Pro (Jan/Feb).

Barua, A., and Mukhopadhyay, T. (2000). "Information Technology and Business Performance: Past,Present, and Future," in: Framing the Domains of Information Technology Management:Projecting the Future... through the past, R.W. Zmud (ed.), Pinnaflex Press, Cincinnati, OH, , pp. 65-84.

Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). “A resource based Perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation”. MIS. Quarterly 24 (1) pp. 169-196.

Bugess, T. F. (1994). “Making the Leap to Agility: Defining and Achieving Agile Manufacturing through Business Process Redesign and Business Network Redesign.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14 (11), Pp.23-34

Camp, W. (2001). “Formulating and Evaluating theoretical frameworks for the career and technical education research.” Journal of Vocational Educational Research, 26-30.

Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn’t matter. Harvard business review 81 (5) pp. 41-50

Christohpher, M., Lowson, R., and Peck, H. (2004). “Creating Agile supply chains in the Fashion Industry,” International journal of Retail & Distribution Management Vol.32 (8), pp 367-376.

Cox B. G. (2010). “Research Methods.” Encyclopedia of survey research methods ISBN: 978141.

Doz, Y., and Kosonen, M. (2008). “The Dynamics of Strategic Agility: Nokia’s rollercoaster experience”, California management review, 50 (3), pp. 95-118

Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. (2000). “Dynamic capabilities: What are they?” Strategic management Journal, Vol.21 (10//11), pp1105-1121.

Haag, S. and Cummings, M. (2012). Management Information Systems for the Information Age, United States: McGraw-Hill Education.

Harris, R. B. (2009). A system Analysis and Design Course Experience with 60th MIS and CS majors, Proc ISECON 2008, v25.

Hoopes, D.G., Madsen, T.L. and Walker, G. (2003). “Guest Editors’ Introduction to the Special Issue: Why is there a Resource-Based View? Towards a Theory of Competitive Heterogeneity.” Strategic Management Journal; (24), pp. 889–902.

Karimi, J., Somers, T.M., and Gupta, Y.P. (2001)."Impact of Information Technology Management

Mukhopadhyay, T., Rajiv, S., and Srinivasan, K. (1997)."Information technology impact on process output and quality," Management Science 43 (12), pp 1645-1659.

Nambisan, S.(2002). "Complementary Product Integration by High-Technology New Ventures: The Role of Initial Technology Strategy," Management Science (48:3) 2002, pp 382-398.

Karimi, J., Somers, T.M., and Gupta, Y. P. (2001). "Impact of Information Technology Management Practices on Customer Service," Journal of Management Information Systems (17:4), pp 125-158.

Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology, Methods and Techniques: New age international (P) Limited.

Lambert, D. M. and Pohlen, T. l. (2001). Supply Chain Metrics. The international Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(1), pp.1-19.

Laudon, K. C. and Traver, C.G. (2011).Management Information Systems, (12th Ed.). United States: Prentice Hall.

Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Social Science Research; Theories and Principles, Nairobi: Applied Research and Training Services, pp.18.

Mukhopadhyay, T., Rajiv, S., and Srinivasan, K. (1997). "Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Quality," Management Science 43 (12), pp. 1645-1659.

Nachmias, David. (1996). Research Methods in the Social Sciences. (5th ed.). London: St. Martin’s Press Inc.

Nambisan, S. (2002). "Complementary Product Integration by High-Technology New Ventures: The Role of Initial Technology Strategy," Management Science (48:3) 2002, pp 382-398.

Neuman, W., L.(2010). “Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative. Ethiop. J. Educ. & Sc. Vol. 6 (1) September, 108 quantitative approaches.

Ngechu, M.(2004). Understanding the Research Process and Methods: An introduction to Research Methods Nairobi, Acts Press.

Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A. and Sambamurthy,V. (2006). “Enterprise agility and enabling role of information technology.” European Journal of Information systems 15 (2), pp.120-131.

Ravichandran, T. and Lertwongsatien C. (2005). “Effects of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: resource-based perspective.” Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4) pp.237-276.

Roth, A. V. and Menor, L. J. (2003). “Insights into service operations management; A research Agenda, Production and operations management,” 12 (2), pp.145-164.

Sambamurthy, V., V. Bharadwaj, V. Grover. (2003). “Shaping Agility through Digital Optios: Re-conceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. ” MIS Quarterly 27 (2) pp.237-263

Swafford, P. M., Ghosh S. and Murthy M. (2006). “The Antecedents of Supply Chain Agility of firm, scale development ad model testing.” Journal of Operations Management 24 (2) pp.170-188.

Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Micro-foundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance,” Strategic Management Journal Vol.28 (13), pp 1319-1350.

Wang, Y., Ahmed, P K. and Worrall, L., (2007). Understanding Inter-firm network: A theoretical review. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 1(1), pp.73-98.

White, A., Daniel, E. M. and Mohdzain, M. (2005). “ The role of emergent information technologies and systems in enabling supply chain agility”, International journal of information management, 25 (5), pp. 396-410

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v1i2.45

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.