EFFECT OF DEVOLUTION ON SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES PERFORMANCE IN KENYA

Dorcas Mugure Mwangi

Abstract


The rationale for considering decentralization in anti-poverty programs is that it might have positive effects on the economic development. Decentralization brings the government closer to the people. Local officials are better informed on the local needs, and are thus more capable of providing the optimal mix of local policies. While the SMEs subsector constitute close to 80% of employment, it only contributes to about twenty percent (20%) of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2011 in Kenya. This implies dismal subsector performance despite its potential contribution to employment, income and equity as was asserted in the ILO report in 1972. The performance of the SMEs in Kenya is linked to several constraints among which the regulatory and institutional framework is alleged to be one of the factors. SMEs in Kenya are threatened for survival as a competitive enterprise. The purpose of the study was to establish the effect of devolution on small and medium enterprises performance in Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive survey research design. The target population of this study composed of representatives of the various industries including the matatu, dairy, supermarkets, jua kali and small manufacturing companies in Nairobi and its environs. The target population of this study was therefore 1015. The study used stratified random sampling method to select 10% of the respondents who formed a sampling frame of 102 respondents. Data was collected using questionnaires. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics done with the help of software program SPSS version 21 and presented using frequency tables. In addition, multivariate regression model was applied to determine the relative importance of each of the two variables with respect to SME performance. The study revealed that that fees and levies, affect the performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Kenya to a moderate extent. The study concluded that fees and levies, cess and rates by the county government affect the performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Kenya. The study also concluded that SME financing mechanism, fair trading practices, capacity development, mechanism for value addition and increase in supply, distribution and access to goods and services affect the performance of Small and Medium Enterprises affect the performance of SMEs in Kenya. The recommends that the county government should use the finances collected from fees and levies, cess and rates in proper and controlled manner with a goal of improving the working environment for the SMEs in Kenya. The study also recommends that the county government should put in strict measures to ensure that there is no corruption in the fees and levies, cess and rates collection process to ensure that the amount collected do not go to the hands of few individuals and that a substantial amount can be received to support the plans and policies of the county government. The study suggested that a similar study should be carried out in other counties to find out whether it will yield the same results. The study focused on SMEs, another study should be carried out to find out the effect of devolution on large companies.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, S. Z., Rani, N. S. A. &Kassim, S. K. M. (2011). Business Challenges and Strategies for Development of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia.Int. J. Business Competition and Growth, 1(2): 177–197.

Bardhan, P. &Mookherjee, D. (2006).Decentralization and Accountability in infrastructure Delivery in Developing Countries.Economic Journal, 116, 101-127.

Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of Governance and Development.Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 185-205.

Benneworth, P. & Roberts, P. (2002). Devolution, Sustainability and Local Economic Development: Impacts on Local Autonomy, Policy-making and Economic Development Outcomes, Local Economy 17(3), 239–252.

Clarkson, M.B.E (2008). A Stakeholder framework for Analysing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance.Academy of Management Journal, 20 (1), 92-117.

Cooper, D.R & Schindler, P.S. (2003).Business research methods.Irwin: McGraw-Hill.

Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and mixed methods.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.

Cunningham, L. X., & Rowley, C. (2008). The development of Chinese small and medium enterprises and human resource management: A review. Asia Pacific.Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 353-279.

GOK, (2008).End Term Review of the Economic Recovery Strategy for Wealth and Employment Creation 2003–07, Nairobi: Office of the Prime Minister, Ministry of Planning, National Development and Vision 2030.

Government of Kenya, National Development Plans, (2010-2009). Nairobi: Government Printer.

Heneman, R. L., Tansky, J. W., & Camp, S. M. (2000).Human resource management practices in small and medium sized enterprises: Unanswered questions and future research perspectives. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 25(1), 11-26.

Hodges, H.E. &Kuratko, D. (2004).Entrepreneurship theory process and practice, (6th Ed.)Canada: South-Western College Publication.

ILO (1972). Employment, incomes and equity: a strategy of increasing productive employment in Kenya. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

Jawahar, I. M. & McLaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive Stakeholder Theory: An Organizational Life Cycle Approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26 (3), 397-414.

Kauzya, J–M. (2007) Political Decentralization in Africa: Experiences of Uganda, Rwanda and South Africa, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, December.

Kayanula, D. & Quartey, P. (2012). The Policy Environment for Promoting Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Ghana and Malawi. Finance and Development Research Programme, Working Paper Series, Paper No 15, IDPM, University of Manchester.

Kiggundu, M.N. (2012). Entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship in Africa: what is known and what needs to be done, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7 No. 3, 239-58.

Kimenyi, M. &Ndung’u, N. (2012). Sporadic Ethnic Violence: Why has Kenya not experienced full-blown civil war?’, in P. Collier and N. Sambanis (eds.) Understanding Civil War in Africa, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank

Kirwan, B.E. (2009). The Incidence of U.S. Agricultural Subsidies on Farmland Rental Rates.Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 117 (1), 138-164.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited Publishers.

Kvale, S. (2007).Doing interviews.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lidija R. B. (1996). Decentralization – Key Issues, Major Trends and Future Developments, Institute of Federalism, University of Fribourg.

Litvack, J., Ahmad, J. & Bird, R. M. (2011). Rethinking decentralization in developing countries. World Bank Sector Studies Series.

Martínez-Vázquez, J. & McNab, R. M. (2005). Fiscal Decentralization, Macrostability and Growth. International Studies Program Working Paper 0506, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies: Georgia State University.

Mugenda, A.G. (2008). Social Science Research. Nairobi: Acts Press.

Mugenda, O. M. & Mugenda, A. G. (2003) Research Methods, Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: Nairobi Acts Press.

Ndegwa, S.N. (2013). Decentralization in Africa: A stock-taking survey. Africa Working Paper Series No. 40, the World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Oates, W. (1999).Fiscal decentralization and Economic Development. National Tax Journal, 46(2), 237-243.

Oates, W. (2012).Fiscal decentralization and Economic Development. National Tax Journal, 46(2), 237-243.

Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Oates, W. E. (2007). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Odhiambo, S. (2013).Kenya’s Momentous Devolution: proper policies are needed to devolve SMEs. Business Daily, Monday.

Orodho A.J, (2003). Essentials of Educational and Social Science Research methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Nairobi Acts Press.

Prud'homme, R. (2005). The Dangers of Decentralization.World Bank Research Observer, 10, (2), 201-220.

Rauch, A., &Frese, M. (1997).Relations between planning and success in small enterprises in Ireland and in Germany. Paper presented at the 42nd World Conference of the ICSB International Council for Small Business, San Francisco.

Reddy, R.J.P. (2010). Problems and Development of Small Scale Industries In India. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.

Republic Of Kenya, (2009). Economic Survey. Nairobi Kenya: Government Printers.

Republic Of Kenya, (2010). Economic Survey. Nairobi Kenya: Government Printers.

Republic Of Kenya, (2012). Economic Survey. Nairobi Kenya: Government Printers.

Republic of Kenya, (2005).Sessional Paper No.2.Nairobi: Government printer.

Republic of Kenya, (2007).Kenya Bureau of Statistics.Nairobi: Government Printer.

Republic Of Kenya, (2008).Economic Survey. Nairobi Kenya: Government Printers.

Rodríguez-Pose, A. &Bwire, A. (2011).The Economic (In) efficiency of Devolution, Environment and Planning 36(11), 1907–1928.

Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Gill, N. (2004). Is there a Global Link between Regional Disparities and Devolution.Environment and Planning 36(12), 2097–2117.

Rodriguez-Pose, A. & N. Gill (2003). The Global Trend towards Devolution and Its Implications, Monograph, Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics, UK.

Sharma, S. (2012).Key Factors That Hinder SMEs in Succeeding in Today's Knowledge-Based Economy.International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 2(2): 141-157.

Slade, K.M. (1939). The Ability-to-Pay Theory of Taxation.The American Economic Review, Vol.29 (1), 92-101.

Visser, K. (1997).Enterprise education in South Africa.Papers in education, training and enterprise. Centre for African Studies, University of dinburgh.www.http://napck.org/www.thedti.gov.za

World Bank, (2010), World Economic Forum.

Worldbank (2009).World Development Indicators 2009.Technical report.

Young, N. (2009). Understanding the Research Process and Methods. An Introduction to Research Methods. Las Vegas: Acts Press.

Zimmerer, T., Searborough, N.& Wilson, D. (2008).Essential of entrepreneur1/2ship and small business management, (5th Ed.).New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v1i2.52

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.