ROLE OF MARKETING MIX ON PERFORMANCE OF MICRO FINANCE INSTITUTIONS IN KENYA

Purity Kanja Murangiri

Abstract


Marketing mix play a key role in the performance of any institution. The purpose of this study was to assess the role of marketing mix on performance of MFIs. The objectives of the study were to establish the effect of promotion on the performance of microfinance institutions and to find out the extent to which pricing affects performance of microfinance institutions. The study adopted a descriptive design. The target population of this study was derived from the five selected microfinance institutions. The target population considered was the marketing managers who are based in head office in each of five institutions and the business development officers who are involved in marketing and selling of products on daily basis. A sample size of 13 marketing managers was selected purposively while 60 business development officers were selected randomly from the population. The study used questionnaire to collect the primary data. Piloting was carried out to test the validity and reliability of the instruments. Data was then coded, entered into a computer and was subjected to SPSS 19.0 for analysis. The study found out that majority of the respondents rated their institutions good or average in profitability. Sales promotion had the highest influence on performance of MFI followed by publicity; the third element of promotion mix which influenced the performance of MFIs was advertisement. Public relation did not strongly association with performance of MFIs. Other factors that had significant influence though with weaker level of association were personal selling and display of products. Pearson correlation analysis between the pricing strategies used and the MFI performance indicated that, the pricing strategies had negative relationship with the profitability, pricing strategies had a weak negative relationship with the number of clientele served, similarly a positive correlation exists between pricing strategy and market share. Poor pricing strategies result to inflated interest rates that turn away potential clients and reduce the amount of loan demanded. This study therefore recommended to MFIs to have well articulated, marketing mix incorporated in their marketing plans as a way of enhancing their performance. It also recommended that for MFIs to achieve better results in building the clientele base, amount of loan sold and improved profitability, they can leverage on the current developments in the banking industry especially adoption of mobile banking and agency banking.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Accion, 2008, marketing strategies for microfinance, Building sustainable, commercial microfinance programs.

Audia, Pino G., Edwin A. Locke, and Ken G. Smith (2000), “The Paradox of Success: An Archival and a Laboratory Study of Strategic Persistence Following Radical Environmental Change,” Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 837-853.

Bonoma, T.V. and Clark, B.H. (1988) Marketing performance assessment. Harvard Business School Press.

Brownlie, Douglas & Saren, Michael, (1992). The Four Ps of the Marketing Concept: Prescriptive, Polemical, Permanent and Problematical. European Journal of Marketing.

Chen, H. & Green, R.D., (2009). Marketing Mix and Branding: Competitive Hypermarket strategies.

International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 2(1), 17-34.

Constantinides, E., (2002). The 4S Web-Marketing Mix model. Electronic Commerce Research and

Applications, 1(1), 57–76

Cyert, Richard M. and James G. March (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Fahy, J., Hooley, G.J., Cox, A.J., Beracs, J., Fonfara, K. and Snoj. B.(2000) The development

and impact of marketing capabilities in Central Europe. Journal of International

Business Studies. 31(1): 63-81.

Finney, S.J. and DiStefano, C. (2006) Non-normal and Categorical Data in Structural

Equation Modeling. In Hancock, G.R. and Mueller, R.O. (editors) Structural Equation

Modeling:A Second Course. Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Fredrickson, J. W. (1985), “Effects of Decision Motive and Organizational Performance Level on Strategic Decision Processes,” Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 821-843.

Hooley, G. and Greenley, G. (2005) The Resource underpinnings of competitive positions.

Journal of Strategic Marketing. 13(2): 93-116.

Hooley, G., Greenley, G., Fahy, J. and Cadogan, J. (2001) Market-focused Resources,

Competitive Positioning and Firm Performance. Journal of Marketing Management. 17(5-6): 503-520.

Hooley, G.J., Greenley, G., Cadogan, J.W. and Fahy J. (2005) The performance impact of marketing resources. Journal of Business Research. 58(1): 18-27.

Hooley, G.J., Saunders, J.A. and Piercy, N.F. (1998) Marketing strategy & Competitive positioning (Second edition). Prentice Hall Europe.

Karlan,D 2001 “Microfinance Impact Assesses the perils of using New members as a control group journal of microfinance.

Kotler, P. (2003) Marketing management (11th edition). Prentice Hall.

Kotler, P. (1999) Kotler on marketing: How to create, win, and dominate markets. The Free Press.

Kotler, Philip. 1988. Marketing Management:Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control,Sixth Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Publishing Company.

Lieberman, M., Montgomery, D. (1988) First-Mover Advantages. Strategic Management Journal. 9: 41-58.

Lieberman, M., Montgomery, D. (1998) First-Mover (Dis) advantages: Retrospective And Link with the Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal. 19(12)

Longenecker, J. G., Petty, C. W., Moore, J. W. and Palich, L. E. (2006). Small Business Management, An entrepreneurial emphasis. London: Thomson South Western.

Luhby,T1999, Astoria Financial: short term profits, long term risks; crains New York Business, vol 15.

Lackmann, A2003, Transforming Food service into culinary art; long island business news vol 50.

Mayle, D., Hinton, M., Francis, G. and Holloway, J. (2002) What really goes on in the name of benchmarking? In Neely, A. Business performance measurement: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Murray, s ., 2008. Microfinance marketing.

Neely, A. (2002) Business performance measurement: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press

Salminen, M. (2006) Innovaatioyrittäjä jää laakereille lepäämään. Kauppalehti.12:18-19.

.Palich, L.E., L.B. Cardinal, and C.C. Miller (2000), “Curvilinearity in the Diversification-Performance Linkage: An Examination of over Three Decades of Research,” Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2), 155–74.

Srinivasan,V;Park, Chan Su and Chang, Dae Ryun ( 2005), An approach to the measurement, Analysis, and prediction of brand Equity and its Sources, Management Science.

Yoo, Boonghee; Donthu, Naveen and Lee, Sungho (200), An Examination of Selected Marketing Mix Elements and Brand Equity, Academy of Marketing Science




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v1i2.54

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.