The main objective of this study was to assess the effects of community engagement at different project phases on projects sustainability. To achieve this, the study specifically investigated the effect of engaging the community during the planning, implementation and monitoring and evaluation phases of project management towards achieving sustainability. Data was collected from 200 different people who had been involved with JKUAT sponsored community projects. This represented 10% of the entire population. Case study research design was applied.  Primary data was collected using self-administered questionnaire while secondary data was collected from JKUAT’s annual reports, journals, books, researches, thesis, dissertations, articles, working papers, and the internet. Data was collected by drop and pick method. The questionnaire were evaluated for content validity and reliability. Data presentation was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. From the findings, it was deduced that the community was not fully involved in all the stages of projects development. In the project planning phase, the respondents indicated minimal involvement where a majority of the respondents disagreed in community engagement in the identification of community based projects. In the project implementation stage, majority of the respondents disagreed on involvement of the community in the coordination of the project activities. The findings also indicated lack of community engagement in the evaluation and monitoring stage which was evidenced by the fact that most of the respondents disagreed that the community formed the evaluation team and helped develop the performance indicators. The study concluded that sustainability had neither been mainstreamed nor prioritized in each phase. It was recommended that there was need for community members to identify their own needs, analyze the factors that lead to the needs, and draw up community action plans and schedules to address the needs.  The study also recommended that before the implementing parties commence on the project, there should be exhaustive and detailed approach to mainstream and prioritize project sustainability in all the phases with specific steps deliberately taken to entrench long-term project benefits. 

Key Words: Community Engagement, Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation and Sustainability

Full Text:



Altschuld, J. W., & Kumar, D. D. (2010). Needs assessment. An overview. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Ashwell, H., & Barclay, L. (2010). Challenges to achieving sustainable community health development within a donor aid business model. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 34(3), 320–325.

Bamberger, M., & Cheema, S. (2007). Case studies of project sustainability: implications for policy and operations from Asian experience. (p. x + 111pp.). Economic Development Institute, World Bank.

Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community

Bryson, J. M. (2011). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. John Wiley & Sons.

Chai, N. (2009). Sustainability Performance Evaluation System in Government: A Balanced Scorecard Approach Towards Sustainable Development. Springer.

Chappel (2005). Artand wellbeing. Sydney, Australia: Australia Council for the Arts. Community Engagement. Springer Science & Business Media.

Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846

David, W. (2007). Managing Civic And Community Engagement. McGraw-Hill

Dernbach, J. C. (2002). Stumbling Toward Sustainability. Environmental Law Institute. Desouza, E. (2013). Project Management offices: A case of knowledge-based archetypes.

Development-induced Displacement. Berghahn Books. Education (UK).

Engagement in Higher Education: Policy Reforms and Practice. Springer. Jacob, W. J., Sutin, S. E., Weidman, J. C., & Yeager, J. L. (2015b). Community Engagement in Higher Education: Policy Reforms and Practice. Springer. Jana, S., Basu, I., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., & Newman, P. A. (2004). The Sonagachi

Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Educational Technology Publications Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(2), 179–192.

European Commission, (2002). Sustainable Development. Connor, A. (2009). 18 Rules of Community Engagement. Happy About.

Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 17–27.

Fulgham, S. M., & Shaughnessy, M. F. (2013). Q & A with ed tech leaders: Interview with Roger Kaufman. Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 48(5), 49–52.

Fulgham, S. M., & Shaughnessy, M. F. (2013). Q & A with ed tech leaders: Interview with Roger Kaufman. Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 48(5), 49–52.

Gilbert, T. F. (2008). Human competence—engineering worthy performance. NSPI Journal, 17(9), 19–27.

Hacker, K. (2013). Community-Based Participatory Research. SAGE Publications. Häkkinen, T., & Belloni, K. (2011). Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building Research & Information.

Hamdi, N., & Goethert, R. (1997). Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice. Chichester ; New York: John Wiley.

Hasna, A. M. (2012). Dimensions of Sustainability. Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Community Development, 1(2), 47–57.

Institute, P. M. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge

Jabareen, Y. (2006). A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development.

Jacob, W. J., Sutin, S. E., Weidman, J. C., & Yeager, J. L. (2015a). Community

Kaufman, R. A., Rojas, A. M., & Mayer, H. (1993). Needs assessment: a user’s guide.

Kuei, C., & Lu, M. H. (2013). Integrating quality management principles into sustainability management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence,

Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten Steps to a Results-based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Handbook for Development Practitioners. World Bank Publications.

Mangin, J.-M. (1991). Rural Water Supply in Southern Ethiopia: Failures and Alternatives. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 12(2), 297–312.

Maraga, J. N., Kibwage, J. K., & Oindo, B. O. (2010). Factors determining community participation in afforestation projects in River Nyando basin, Kenya. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4(12), 853–859.

McDowell, C. (1996). Understanding Impoverishment: The Consequences

Mobey, & Parker. (2002). Risk evaluation and its importance to project implementation. Work Study, 51(4), 202–208.

Mobey, & Parker. (2002). Risk evaluation and its importance to project implementation. Work Study, 51(4), 202–208.

Mona C. Shediac-Rizkallah, L. R. B. (1998). Planning for Sustainability of Community-Based Health Programs: Conceptual Frameworks and Future Directions for Research, Practice and Policy. Health Education Research, 13(1), 87–108.

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2013). Research methods: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nariobi, Kenya: African Centre for Technology Studies.

Muraguri, P. G. (2011). An analysis of factors influencing sustainability of constituency development funded projects in Kiharu Constituency, Murang’a District in Central Province, Kenya. University of Nairobi, Kenya, Nairobi: Masola Publishers.

Ojwang, W. O., & Bwisa, H. M. (2014). Role of Participatory Management in the Sustainability of Constituency Development Fund Projects: A Case Study of Maragua Constituency.

Orodho, A. J. (2003). Essentials of educational and social sciences Research Methods.

Poverty. Juta and Company Ltd.

Seghezzo, L. (2009). The five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics

Silvius, G., Köhler, G. S., Ron Schipper, Julia Planko, Jasper van den Brink and Adri, Schipper, R., & Planko, J. (2012). Sustainability in Project Management (Ebk - Epub). Gower Publishing, Ltd.

Simon, C. E. (2009). Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, Vol. 2 No.

Swanepoel, H., & Beer, F. D. (2006). Community Development: Breaking the Cycle

Tang, S. L., Ahmad, I. U., Ahmed, S. M., & Lu, M. (2004). Quantitative Techniques for Decision Making in Construction: Society, Literature, Film. Hong Kong University Press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.