Arwin Wekesa Khaemba


The researcher's main aim in this study was to find out the role of organizational socialization on the performance of employees at equity bank in Kenya, this involves explaining the variables under the study which are training and mentoring, in order to identify what role they play on employee performance. The study used quantitative research approach. Quantitative approach includes designs, techniques and measures that produce discreet numerical data. The researcher was therefore interested in information that relates quantitatively to the research. The case study method was selected because it carries out in depth analysis of particular single entity in this case Equity Bank. This study targeted the staff members of Equity Bank in ten branches which have a total of 433 members of staff. The researcher used a stratified random sampling technique to ensure that all the key areas which are located in a major town center Nairobi and those in small urban areas are adequately represented in the study. Data was collected using questionnaires which were administered by the researcher to the respondents who were the staff members of Equity Bank in the selected ten branches. Upon completion of the research the researcher processed and analyzed data using The SPSS tool which was presented in the form of tables for demonstrations pie-charts, percentages and graphs.  The study recommends that organizations should emphasize on mentoring newcomers also the study recommends that organizations should emphasize on training this is because the training program plays a major role in how individuals make sense of and adjust to their new job settings.

Full Text:



Abaspoor A (2008). Advanced Human Resource Management, Samt issuances, Third edition, pp. 154-158. 2nd ed, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 445-505.

Abtahi H (2002). Human Resource Management in Public, Industrial and Business Organizations, Institution of Management Training and Research, Second edition, Tehran, p. 81 century. Academy of Management Executive, 10(4), 80–88.

Chao, G. T., O’Leary-Kelly, A, M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 5, 730-743.

Cooper D (2006). Invited Manuscript Organizational socialization: A new theoretical model and recommendations for future research and HRM practices in organization, J. Manager. Psychol., 21(5): 492-516

Cooper-Thomas, H.D., Van Vianen, A. and Anderson, N. (2004), “Changes in person organization fit: the impact of socialization tactics on perceived and actual P-O fit”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 52-78. CT: JAI Press.

Erdogan, B. and Enders, J. (2007), “Support from the top: supervisors’ perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92 No. 2, pp. 321-30.

Farahi B (2008). Socialization Process. J. Manage. Dev., 7: 47. Griffin M (2003). Organizational Behavior, Translate: Mehdi Alvani and Gholamreza Memar Zade, Morvarid issuances, 9 edition, Tehran, 53p.

Feldman, D.C. (1989), “Socialization, resocialization, and training: reframing the research agenda”, in Goldstein, I. (Ed.), Training and Development in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Fisher, S. L., Wasserman, M. E. Wolf, P. P. &Hannan Wears, K. (2008). ‘Human resource issues

George, E. (2003). External solutions and internal problems: The effects of employment externalization on internal workers attitudes. Organizational Science; vol. 14, 386-402

Hulin, C.L. (1991), “Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations”, in Dunnette, M.D. and Hough, L.M. (Eds),Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2, 2nd ed., Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 445-505.

Hutchison, S. (1997), “A path model of perceived organizational support”, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 12, pp. 159-74.

Korte R (2010). Leader socialization in organizations: The importance of making connections for leadership performance, Robins A (2008).

Mugenda O. Mugenda A., (1999). Research Methods; Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi, Africa Centre for Technology Studies

Ruth C. King, Weidong Xia, James Campbell Quick, Vikram Sethi (2009). Socialization and organizational outcomes of information technology professionals. Career Development International Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 26-51.

Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Socialization tactics and newcomer information acquisition. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5, 48–61.

Saks, A. M., & Waldman, D. A. (In press). The relationship between age and job performance evaluations for entry-level professionals. Journal of Organizational Behavior.

Saremi M (2003). A model to Evaluate Performance and Ranking Refah Banks, Manage. Cult. J., 40: 58

Schein, E. H. (1996). Career anchors revisited: Implications for career development in the 21st century. Academy of management Executive, 10(4), 80-88

Schneider, B. (1983). Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 1–31). Greenwich,

Syatat A (2006). Human Resource Management, Management issuances, Third edition, Tehran, pp. 47-171.

Syed JR (2009). Human Resource Management, Management College issuances, Tehran, Forth edition, p. 27, 267. Thomas G, Reio

Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: The influence of training fulfilment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 759–769.

Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational behavior, 1, 209-264. vol. 47, 501-523


  • There are currently no refbacks.