EFFECT OF BOARD COMPOSITION ON PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS LISTED IN THE NAIROBI SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ROSE MINAGE ADIKA

Abstract


Due to various scandals and failures of some big firms such as Commerce Bank, Enron, Adelphia and World Com, there has been reviewed interest on board composition attributes that have effect on firm outcomes.  This thesis attempted to assess the effect of board composition on firms performance, specifically a case of Kenyan listed companies.  The specific objectives of the study were to establish the effect of non-executive directors on performance of firms listed in Nairobi Securities Exchange and to assess the effect of directors’ nationality on performance of firms listed in Nairobi Securities Exchange. Firm performance was measured using Return on Equity ratio. The study adopted both descriptive and explanatory research designs. 45 firms listed between 2007 and 2013 in the Nairobi Securities Exchange were considered in the study hence census design was adopted. Secondary data was used to capture the performance of quoted companies for the last seven (7) consecutive years, that is, 2007 to 2013 filed at Capital Markets Authority.  Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used. The study hypotheses were tested using pooled data from the 45 listed firms in Nairobi Securities Exchange between 2007 and 2013. The study found a statistically significant positive effect of board composition attributes in form of non-executive directors and directors nationality on firm performance. The study results further indicated that the resource dependence theory acts as an interlinkage model between board composition attributes specifically non-executive directors and directors nationality, and firm performance. Therefore, the practical contribution of this study has been to highlight the strategic composition of boards and dynamic consideration of the organizational context and needs for board linkages for management practice. The study recommends that future researchers to measure the benefits accrued from directors’ advice and counsel, legitimacy and channels of communication, support and resources and also assess whether the non-executive directors understand and act on these benefits.

Key Words; Non-Executive Directors, Directors Nationality and Firm Performance


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review 62, 777-795.

Al-Najjar, B. (2012). The determinants of the frequency of board meetings: Evidence from categorical analysis. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 13 (2), 178-190

Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D., & Kinney, W. (2006). The Discovery and Consequences of Internal Control Deficiencies Prior to SOX-Mandated Audits. Working paper. University of Wisconsin, University of Iowa, and University of Texas.

Baranchuk, N., & Dybvig, P. (2009). Consensus in Diverse Corporate Boards. The Review of Financial Studies 22 (2), 715-747.

Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of Corporate Governance on Bond Ratings and Yields: The Role of Institutional Investors and Outside Directors. The Journal of Business 76 (3), 455

Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: is there an expectations gap? Corporate Governance: An International Review 14 (6), 577-593.

Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 4 (4), 639-660.

Connelly, J. T., & Limpaphayom, P. (2004). Environmental reporting and firm performance: evidence from Thailand. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 13 (1), 37-149.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2006). Business Research Methods. (9th ed.). New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited.

Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand A. E. (1999). Meta-analystic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 19 (3), 269-290.

Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand A. E. (1999). Meta-analystic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 19 (3), 269-290.

Dehaene, A., De Vuyst, V., & Ooghe, H. (2001). Corporate Performance and Board Structure in Belgian Companies. Long Range Planning 34(3), 383-398.

Demb, A., & Neubauer, F. F. (1992). The Corporate Board: Confronting the Paradoxes. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics 26, 301-325.

Fisher, F. M., & McGowan, J. J. (1983). On the misuse of accounting rates of return to infer monopoly profits. American Economic Review 73, 82–97.

Goodstein, J., Gautum, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of Board size and Diversity on Strategic Change. Strategic Management Journal 15 (3), 241-250.

Goodstein, J., Gautum, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of Board size and Diversity on Strategic Change. Strategic Management Journal 15 (3), 241-250.

Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 33 (7/8), 1034-1062.

Harris, J., & Bromiley, P. (2007). Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organization Science 18, 350–367.

Henri, J. F. (2004). Performance measurement and organizational effectiveness: Bridging the gap. Managerial Finance 30 (6), 93-123.

Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review 28, 383-396.

Johnson, J. L. (1996). Boards of directors and agency problems outcomes: A test of board dependence and the adoption of multiple takeover defenses. Ph,D. Dissertation. Indiana University.

Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Martin, G. S. (2009). The cost to firms of cooking the books. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 43, 581–611.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modelling. (3rd ed.). New York, London: The Guilford Press.

Lorsch, J. W., & Maclver, E. (1989). Pawns and Potentates: The reality of America’s Corporate Boards. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Ma, S., & Tian, G. (2009). Board Composition, Board Activity and Ownership Concentration, the impact on firm performance. Asian Finance Association (AsianFA) Conference, Brisbane, University of Queensland Business School (UQBS).

Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2004). Choice and change of measures in performance measurement models. Management Accounting Research, 15(4):441−469.

March, J. G., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organization Science 8, 698–706.

Oxelheim, L., & Randoy, T. (2003). The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking and Finance 27, 2369-2392.

Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size, composition and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization - environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly 349-364.

Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society 50, 189-223.

Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S. & Johnson, G. (2008). Measuring Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable: Towards Methodological Best Practice. Strategic Management Journal Review.

Rose, C. (2007). Does Female Board Representation Influence Firm Performance? The Danish Evidence, Corporate Governance: An International Review 15, 2.

Rowe, W. G., Morrow, J. L. (Jr.), & Finch, J. F. (1995). Accounting, market, and subjective measures of firm performance: Three sides of the same coin? Paper presented at the Unpublished Manuscript.

Useem, M. (1993). Investor capitalism. Howard University Press.

Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioural and performance consequences of CEO and board ties. Academy of Management Journal 42 (1), 7-24.

Wiesenfeld, B. M., Wurthmann, K., & Hambrick, D. C. (2008). The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: A process model. Academy of Management Review 33, 231–251.

Williamson, O. E. (1984). Corporate governance. Yale Law Journal 93, 1197-1230.

Williamson, O. E. (1984). Corporate governance. Yale Law Journal 93, 1197-1230.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i2.717

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.