INFLUENCE OF INTEREST RATE CAPPING ON GROWTH OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES NAIROBI COUNTY, KENYA

ELIZABETH JEPKORIR KOECH

Abstract


The study sought to investigate the influence of interest rate capping in Small and Medium Enterprises. The research design was descriptive. The target population of interest for the study was from the Nairobi County. The study was based on a target population of 4560 SMEs. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) was used to analyse the data. Based on the study results of the ANOVA Test or F-test in obtained F-count (calculated) value was 33.370. This was greater than the F-critical (table) value (23.418) with significance of 0.000. Since the significance level of 0.001< 0.05 we concluded that the set of independent variables influence the growth of SMEs in the study area.The study revealed that interest rate capping statistically, strongly and significantly correlated to growth of the SMEs as they had a positive relationship with the dependent variable. Therefore, from these quantitative results it was deduced that the study which sought to establish the influence of interest rate capping on growth of SMEs was achieved because it established that it influenced growth of SMEs. The[EJK1]  role of credit is basically to bridge the gap between business owner’s financial assets and the required financial assets of the business/enterprise. There is need to remove that imbalance between the two hence creating the demand for credit. From the perspective of borrowers, lower rates can increase the potential demand for loans and financial inclusion, while excessive rates can push borrowers into over-indebtedness. The bank credit and bank deposits are very closely related with each other that they represent, roughly speaking, two sides of the same coin, the balance sheets of banks. The lending activity is made possible only if the banks can mobilize enough funds from their customers. The  banks face repricing risk if either the average yield on its assets or that on its liabilities is more sensitive to changes in market interest rates. Such a difference in sensitivity could reflect a number of possible mismatches in the characteristics of assets and liabilities. The interest rates ceiling is a key economic aspects that impact the economic growth in the SMEs. The need to regulate the interest charged on credit or any other financial instrument should be founded on the necessity to control economic patterns that has great influence to the SMEs. Controlling and setting of interest rates has huge fiscal implication to the economic development hence the need for rational decision making process within the banking industry to enhance growth of SMES.

Key Words: Credit Products, Customer Deposits, Bank Interest Risks, Interest Rate Ceiling

 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beatty, R. C., Shim, J. P., & Jones, M. C. (2001). Factors influencing corporate web site adoption: a time-based assessment. Information & management, 38(6), 337-354.

Bradford, M., & Florin, J. (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International journal of accounting information systems, 4(3), 205-225.

Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002). Shaping up for e-commerce: institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of web technologies. MIS quarterly, 65-89.

Chau, P. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (1997). Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: an exploratory study. MIS quarterly, 1-24.

Chen, J. C. (1993). The impact of microcomputer systems on small businesses: England, 10 years later. Journal of Small Business Management, 31(3), 96.

Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. Accounting Review, 16-35.

Chong, Alain Yee-Loong, Binshan Lin, Keng-Boon Ooi, and Murali Raman. "Factors affecting the adoption level of c-commerce: An empirical study." Journal of Computer Information Systems 50, no. 2 (2009): 13-22.

Cragg, P. B., & King, M. (1993). Small-firm computing: motivators and inhibitors. MIS quarterly, 47-60.

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

Davis, D., & Dunn, P. (2005). You ought to keep good records and use them in management decisions. Proceedings of the Association of Small Business and Entrepreneurship.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2000). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management (pp. 143-166). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Eder, L. B., & Igbaria, M. (2001). Determinants of intranet diffusion and infusion. Omega, 29(3), 233-242.

Gibbs, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (2004). A cross‐country investigation of the determinants of scope of e‐commerce use: an institutional approach. Electronic markets, 14(2), 124-137.

Hage, J. (1980). Theories of organizations: Form, process, and transformation. John Wiley & Sons.

Hsu, P. F., Kraemer, K. L., & Dunkle, D. (2006). Determinants of e-business use in US firms. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(4), 9-45.

Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS quarterly, 465-485.

Khandwalla, P. N. (1972). Environment and its impact on the organization. International Studies of Management & Organization, 2(3), 297-313.

Kuan, K. K., & Chau, P. Y. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework. Information & management, 38(8), 507-521.

Lee, O. K. D., Wang, M. W., Lim, K. H., & Peng, Z. J. (2009). Knowledge management systems diffusion in Chinese enterprises: A multistage approach using the technology-organization-environment framework. Journal of Global Information Management, 17(1), 70.

Lin, H. F., & Lin, S. M. (2008). Determinants of e-business diffusion: A test of the technology diffusion perspective. Technovation, 28(3), 135-145.

Liu, M. (2008, October). Determinants of e-commerce development: An empirical study by firms in shaanxi, china. In Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2008. WiCOM'08. 4th International Conference on (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

Martins, M., & Oliveira, T. (2009, September). Determinants of e-commerce adoption by small firms in Portugal. In Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on information management and evaluation (pp. 328-338).

Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2009). Determinants of Information Technology Adoption in Portugal. In ICE-B (pp. 264-270).

Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2010). Firms patterns of e-business adoption: evidence for the European Union-27. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 13(1), 47-56.

Pan, M. J., & Jang, W. Y. (2008). Determinants of the adoption of enterprise resource planning within the technology-organization-environment framework: Taiwan's communications industry. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press. Journal of Computer information systems, 48(3), 94-102.

Purvis, R. L., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (2001). The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical investigation. Organization science, 12(2), 117-135.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations fourth edition The Free Press. New York.

Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. Great minds in management: The process of theory development, 37, 460-484.

Soares-Aguiar, A., & Palma-dos-Reis, A. (2008). Why do firms adopt e-procurement systems? Using logistic regression to empirically test a conceptual model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), 120-133.

Starbuck, W. H. (1983). Organizations as action generators. American sociological review, 91-102.

Teo, T. S., Ranganathan, C., & Dhaliwal, J. (2006). Key dimensions of inhibitors for the deployment of web-based business-to-business electronic commerce. IEEE Transactions on engineering Management, 53(3), 395-411.

Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administration.

Thong, J. Y. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of management information systems, 15(4), 187-214.

Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Processes of technological innovation. Lexington books.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.

Wang, Y. M., Wang, Y. S., & Yang, Y. F. (2010). Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technological forecasting and social change, 77(5), 803-815.

Zhu, K., Dong, S., Xu, S. X., & Kraemer, K. L. (2006). Innovation diffusion in global contexts: determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of European companies. European journal of information systems, 15(6), 601-616.

Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management science, 52(10), 1557-1576.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i2.761

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.