DRIVERS OF PERFOMANCE OF ANTI-FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION PROJECTS IN SOUTH WESTERN KENYA

SCHOLASTICA KAGWIRIA MARANGU

Abstract


The purpose of the study was to establish the drivers of performance of anti-female genital mutilation projects in South Western Kenya. It was notable that there exists strong positive relationship between the independent variables and dependent variable. The data showed that the high R squared value of 0.640. It showed that the independent variables in the study were able to explain 64.00% variation in the performance of anti-FGM projects in the study area while the remaining 36.00% was explained by the variables or other aspects outside the model. This indicated that the set of independent variables were important factors that needed to be enhanced to boost performance of projects in the study area.The study recommended for the adequate funding to enhance performance of the anti-FGm projects. There is need for adequate financing mechanisms in the projects. There is need to have effective are the internal controls such as adequate record keeping on control of capital invested in the projects. The project personnel take care of the available financial resources in the projects and there were adequate financial plans to control project funds to enhance performance of the projects.The study recommended that FGM project permanence is about creating a more just and equitable community through encouraging social and cultural diversity. Any FGM project therefore, must give much consideration to socio-cultural aspects in any given project during pre and post-implementation. Performing project design utilizes essential aspects of cultural identity, can serve to synthesize the past with the present for the benefit of the future. The FGM projects at the grassroots has been due to the strategies integrated before the projects are completed, which include sensitivity to socio-cultural factors in the communities where the project are being implemented. The projects are respectful and considerate of the community’s beliefs, norms, and religion. There is need to enhance proper communication during the implementation of the projects. The poor and distorted information slow down project implementation and lead to extra cost. There should be clear channels of communication to facilitate and eliminate the delays project implementation. The project team should have regular site meetings between the consultants and contractors, review and adjustment of communication reports. The information on work breakdown structure should be well understood to enhance the performance of these projects.

Key Words: Project Funding, Project Acceptability, Communication, Legal Framework


Full Text:

PDF

References


Almroth, L., Almroth‐Berggren, V., Hassanein, O. M., El Hadi, N., Al‐Said, S. E., Hasan, S. A., ... & Bergström, S. (2001). A community based study on the change of practice of female genital mutilation in a Sudanese village. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 74(2), 179-185.

Amin, M. E. (2005). Social science research: Conception, methodology and analysis. Makerere University.

Blau, P. M. (1960). Structural effects. American sociological review, 178-193.

Blumberg, B. F., Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods. McGraw-hill education

Corsini-Karagouni, A. (2005). E-solidarity, a means of fighting against FGM (Female Genital Mutilation). Education and the Knowledge Society, 231-236.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Dorkeeno, cutting the rose.

Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2012). Management research. Sage.

Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2009). Towards a Guide for Novice Researchers on Research

Methodology: Review and Proposed Methods. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 6.

Ethiopia. YaMāʻekalāwi stātistiks bālaśelṭān, & ORC Macro. (2006). Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey, 2005. Central Statistical Authority.

Evelia, H., Abdi, M. S., & Askew, I. (2008). Technical Cooperation with the MOH/GTZ Anti-FGM/C Project in Kenya.

Finke, E. (2006). Genital mutilation as an expression of power structures: ending FGM through education, empowerment of women and removal of taboos. African journal of reproductive health, 10(2), 13-17.

Gage, A. J., & Van Rossem, R. (2006). Attitudes toward the discontinuation of female genital cutting among men and women in Guinea. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 92(1), 92-96.

Grassivaro, P. G. (2016). Female Circumcision (Infibulation) in Somalia: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Projects Against Such Practices-the Waris Dirie Project and the Mana Abdurahman Project. International Journal of Anthropology, 31.

Gruenbaum, E. (2014). Sondra Hale’s “Ethnographic Residuals” Silence and Non-Silence on Female Genital Cutting. Journal of Middle East Women's Studies, 10(1), 105-127.

Hashim, Y. A. (2010). Determining sufficiency of sample size in management survey research activities. International Journal of Organisational Management & Entrepreneurship Development, 6(1), 119-130.

Homans, G. C. (1961). Human behavior: Its elementary forms.

Hussein, E. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of capacity building efforts of Social and economic Empowerment of Pastoralist Girls Project (SEEPGP) in Dewe, Telalak and Dulessa woredas of Afar Region (Doctoral dissertation, St. Mary's University).

Kombo, D. K., & Tromp, D. L. (2009). Introduction to proposal writting. Nairobi: Pauline publications.

Jones, S. D., Ehiri, J., & Anyanwu, E. (2004). Female genital mutilation in developing countries: an agenda for public health response. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 116(2), 144-151.

Lewicki, A., & O’Toole, T. (2017). Acts and practices of citizenship: Muslim women’s activism in the UK. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(1), 152-171.

Marcus, M., & Ducklin, A. (1998). Success in sociology. John Murray.

Mandara, M. U. (2004). Female genital mutilation in Nigeria. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 84(3), 291-298.

Mgbako, C., Saxena, M., Cave, A., & Farjad, N. (2010). Penetrating the silence in Sierra Leone: a blueprint for the eradication of female genital mutilation. Harv. Hum. Rts. J., 23, 111.

Mitike, G., & Deressa, W. (2009). Prevalence and associated factors of female genital mutilation among Somali refugees in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC public health, 9(1), 264.

Mugenda, A. G., & Mugenda, A. G. (2012). Research methods dictionary. Nairobi, Kenya: Applied Research & Training Services.

Mukadi, E. B. Challenges Faced in the Eradication of the Female Genital Mutilation Practice among Women: A Case Study of the Tugen Community in Baringo County, Kenya.

Muricho, D. N., Otieno, D. J., & Oluoch-Kosura, W. (2017). Building Pastoralists’ Resilience: Strengthening Participation in Markets and Local Governance Institutions in West Pokot, Kenya.

Musomi, M., & Swadener, B. B. (2017). Enhancing Feminism and Childhoods in Kenya Through Stronger Education Policy, Access, and Action. In Feminism (s) in Early Childhood (pp. 75-87). Springer Singapore.

Msuya, S. E., Mbizvo, E., Hussain, A., Sundby, J., Sam, N. E., & Stray‐Pedersen, B. (2002). Female genital cutting in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: changing attitudes?. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 7(2), 159-165.

Oino, P. G., Towett, G., Kirui, K. K., & Luvega, C. (2015). The Dilemma In Sustainability Of Community-Based Projects In Kenya. Global Journal Of Advanced Research, 2.

Orodho, J. A. (2009). Elements of education and social science research methods. Nairobi/Maseno, 126-133.

Østebø, M. T., & Østebø, T. (2014). Are Religious Leaders a Magic Bullet for Social/Societal Change?: A Critical Look at Anti-FGM Interventions in Ethiopia. Africa Today, 60(3), 82-101.

Penny, S., & Kingwill, P. (2017). Seeds Of The Future/Somali Programme: a shared autoethnography on using creative arts therapies to work with Somali voices in Female Genital Mutilation refusal in the UK. New Writing, 1-10.

Rahmandad, H., & Sterman, J. D. (2012). Reporting guidelines for simulation‐based research in social sciences. System Dynamics Review, 28(4), 396-411.

Richard, F., Ahmed, W., Denholm, N., Dawson, A., Varol, N., Essén, B., ... & Njue, C. (2017, September). Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: sharing data and experiences to accelerate eradication and improve care: part 2. In Reproductive Health (Vol. 14, No. 2, p. 115). BioMed Central.

Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research. John Wiley & Sons.

Roseland, M. (2012). Toward sustainable communities: Solutions for citizens and their governments (Vol. 6). New Society Publishers.

W. S. B. P. (2013). Conceptual Framework.

Saunders, M. N. (2011). Research methods for business students, 5/e. Pearson Education India.

World Health Organization. (2015). Eliminating female genital mutilation: an interagency statement-OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO.

UNICEF2011, Tanzania FGM/C country profile

United Nation 2011, Treaty collection, CEDAW, CRC

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i2.776

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.