DETERMINING WHETHER NETWORK CENTRALITY HAS AN INFLUENCE ON THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF MEDIUM SIZED ENTERPRISES IN KENYA

DOROTHY KIRIMI, PROF. ELEGWA MUKULU (Ph.D), PROF. GEORGE ORWA (Ph.D)

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of network centrality on financial performance of medium sized enterprises in Kenya. A descriptive survey design was adopted. The target population was drawn from 51 medium sized enterprises in Kenya which participated in the KPMG top 100 mid-sized ranking for the period 2011 to 2015. Multi stage, systematic and purposive sampling was used to select a sample of 255 which had the data needed in the study. Primary data was collected using questionnaires which were pretested for reliability and validity to determine it suitability for use in the study. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used in the analysis of data to generate frequency distribution of the responses and descriptive statistics. The study findings indicated that the enterprises had greater power and influence over other enterprises in the industry, the enterprises operated in an environment that offered strategies about competitors and partnership opportunity information was available to their enterprise through networks. It was found that network centrality was positively and significantly related to financial performance. The finding lends support to the social network theory, indicating that the more central the entrepreneur is in the network, the more it will affect business performance. Firms with strong entrepreneurial orientations benefit from the industry leadership status associated with high centrality, because these ventures need to acquire resources and mobilize institutional support from a variety of domains to successfully commercialize their innovations. Medium sized enterprises should consider networking with external environment as part of business planning objective and the management or the owner manager of the business should use it as an instrument for accessing marketing information, for acquiring tangible and intangible resources and finally to improve the performance of their business. The study recommended that managers should carefully construct their alliance networks. Firms with superior advantage-creating or advantage-enhancing capabilities should encourage partners to actively collaborate with one another.

Key Words: Network Centrality, Financial Performance, Medium Sized Enterprises, Entrepreneurial Networks


Full Text:

PDF

References


Azzam, A. M & Ayed, A. (2015 )Impact of Entrepreneurial Networks in the Success of Business On-Going Stage in Jordanian Manufacturing Companies American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal 7(2)110-135

Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6), 795–817

Black, S. ,MorleyS, & Williiams, A, (2002). A confirmatory factor analysis. Elsevier Pain. 99(2), 289-298.

Burns, A., & Groove, B. (2003). The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, critique & utilization. (4th ed.) Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.

Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Davis, L. R. (2007). Maintaining competition in copying: narrowing the scope of Gene patents. Cornell Law faculty publications paper 126 Retrieved on 7th May ,2016 from http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu//isipon

Donckels, R., & Lambrecht, J. (1997). The network position of small businesses: An explanatory model. Journal of Small Business Management 35 (2), 13–25.

Fatima, Ali & Arif (2012). Network classification on the basis of functions they perform and its relationship with internationalization process of SMEs in developing countries. Australian Journal of business and Management Research 1(8)35-53.

Gaudici, A. (2013).Sensing together: an exploration of the support of network intermediaries to firms’ and entrepreneurs’ search for new opportunities. Unpublished Thesis, Granfield University. UK.

Kiraka, R. N. (2013) The Role of Women in Enterprise Development in Africa. Paper Presented at Women in Entrepreneurship International Conference, Accra, Ghana, 4 – 7th April, 2013

Kilduff,M. & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kothari, C. (2014). Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques. (2nd ed.) New Delhi, New Age International Publishers.

KPMG(2013) Kenya Top 100 2013/14 Winner announced. Retrieved on 10th April, 2016 http://www.kpmg.com/eastafrica/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/pages/kenyatop100201314winnerannounced.aspx

Krueger, N. F. (2007). The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(3), 5-23.

Li, Y. M., Lai, C. Y., & Chen, C. W. (2011). Discovering influencers for marketing in the blogosphere. Information Sciences, 181(23), 5143-5157.

Mugenda, O.M., & Mugenda A.G. (2003). Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches (2nd ed.). Nairobi: Acts Press.

Mungania, A. K., Gakure R.W., & Karanja, K (2017). Effects of Outsourcing as a Business Linkage on the Growth of Dairy Enterprises: A Survey of Dairy Enterprises in Mount Kenya Region. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management.5 (5) 445-473.

Oh, H., Chung, M.-H. & Labianca, G. (2004), “Group social capital and group effectiveness: the role of informal socializing ties”, Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6), 860-875.

Peprah.J (2010) Sustainable entrepreneurship: The role of networking .Retrieved on 3rd February 2016 from https://www.uclan.ac.uk/research/explore/.../igfd_sustainable_entrepreneurship

Powell, W.W,White, D.R,. Koput, K. W & Owen-Smith, J.(2005) Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences American Journal of Sociology 110(4)1132-1205

Rahn, M. (2010). Factor analysis: A short introduction on dropping unimportant variables from your analysis. The Analysis Factor: Making Statistics Make Sense Vol. 5 Relations, 7 (23), 39-58

Robinson S., Stubberud H. A. (2011). Sources of advice in entrepreneurship: Gender differences in business owners’ social networks. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 13(2) 83–101.

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, (5thed.), New Delhi: John Wiley & Sons.

Setyawati, S., Mohd, S., Mohd, N., & Saud, M.(2011). Effects of learning, networking and innovation adoption on successful entrepreneurs in Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (5),149-156

Stam W. (2010). Industry event participation and network brokerage among entrepreneurial ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 625-653

Subramani, M. R., & Rajagopalan, B. (2003). Knowledge-sharing and influence in online social networks via viral marketing. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 300-307.

Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (5), 996–1004.

Thrikawala, S. (2011). Impact of Strategic Networks for the Success of SMEs in Sri Lanka (May 1, 2011). World Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 108-119, Retrieved on 15th January, 2017 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2333280.

Waiganjo ,E.W. Mukulu,,E. & Kahiri, J. (2012).Effect of competitive strategies on the relationship between strategic human resource management and firm performance of Kenya’s corporate organizations International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2 (10 )62-70

Wiklund, J. & Sheperd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing.1, (1) 3-19.

Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809-825.

Zikmund, W. G. (2010). Business Research Methods (7th.ed.).Cincinnati, OH: Thompson/South Western.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i4.870

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.