EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP STYLES ON STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION AT THE NATIONAL TREASURY OF KENYA

JERICA KARUMA IKIARA, DR. PAUL KARIUKI (Ph.D)

Abstract


The study sought to establish the effect of leadership styles on strategy implementation at the National Treasury (Ministry of Finance). The researcher adopted a descriptive research study as there were variables that could not be quantified. The researcher selected 210 respondents out of a total of 439. The study recommended that there was need for junior members of staff to be more trusted with decisions or important tasks given that leader in the organization dictate all the work methods and processes, the treasury needs to set out rules given that they important in the organization and tend to be clearly outlined and communicated and that there is also need to encourage more creativity and innovative thinking among the staff. The study established that autocratic leadership, leissez-faire leadership democratic leadership, transactional leadership and transformational leadership affects strategy implementation at the National Treasury (Ministry of Finance). The study also recommended that there was need for the leaders provide the tools and resources needed and ensure that power is handed over to the subordinate and encourage responsibility for the group’s decisions and actions, junior staff members were expected to solve problems on their own and that there was also need for more collaboration between the top management and the junior management and that senior management accepts opinions and suggestions from junior staff. There was need for the treasury to set goals to be achieved through various leaderships and that the treasury as part of its strategy implementation plans and assigns duties that are led by certain leaders. On the other hand all the tasks and activities in strategy implementation process needs to be evaluated after the allocated duration. The leadership style adapted by the management should contribute to the achievement of the Macro-Economic Growth projections that are the objectives of the strategy implementation by the Treasury and the leadership style adapted should be able to demonstrate how resources are mobilized and allocated by the treasury. 

Key Words: Autocratic Leadership, Leissez-Faire, Democratic, Strategy Implementation, Transactional


Full Text:

PDF

References


Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2014). Developing potential across a full range of Leadership: Cases on transactional and transformational leadership, Psychology Press

Albritton, R. L. (2015). A new paradigm of leader effectiveness for academic libraries: An empirical study of the Bass (2005) model of transformational leadership. In T.F. Mech & G.B. McCabe (Eds.), Leadership and academic librarians (pp. 66–82). CT: Greenwood Westport,

Bass, P. (2014) Predicting unit performance in comparison to democratic and autocratic leadership, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3, 33-24

Bass, B. M. (2015). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.

Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2014). Predicting unit performance by assessing Democratic and Autocratic leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 88(2), 207.

Cragen, JF, Wright, DW, & Kasch, CR. (2014) Communication in Small Groups: Theory, Process, and Skills, Wadsworth, Boston

Campbell et al. (2013) Factors to be considered while being a market leader, Princeton: Princeton University Press, UK

Daft, RL. (2015) The Leadership Experience. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning, India

Giambatista R.T (2014). ) Strategic Management, Models and Applications, Prentice Hall, London

Hill, R. (2015). The determinants of strategy Implementation, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89 No.7, pp.89- 90

Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2013). Democratic and Autocratic leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of applied psychology, 78(6), 891.

Kotlyar, I., & Karakowsky, L. (2016). Falling Over Ourselves to Follow the Leader. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, 38-49 •

Koech, D. & Namusunge, L. (2012) The effect of leadership styles on organization performance, which focused States Corporation at Mombasa, ACME Publications, Nairobi, Kenya

Kieni, P. (2013) The influence of autocratic leadership style on performance of organizations in private organizations in Kenya, Unpublished Edition Nairobi, Kenya

Kouzes, R. and Posner, B. (2014). Encouraging the Heart, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, 78-82

Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2016). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The leadership quarterly, 7(3), 385-425.

Leslie, P. (2014) Evaluating the influence of management on the performance of public organization in Malasyia, PAIRS Essentials. Florida: PAIRS Foundation. ISBN 0985427817. 72

Lussier,D. (2013) The effect of leadership capacity on the performance of public organization, Journal of applied psychology, 56(4), 78.

Muriuki, P. (2013) Factors affecting strategic management in an Organization, Unpublished Edition, Nairobi, Kenya.

Maina, K. (2015) The relationship between leadership styles and the performance of small and medium enterprises in Nairobi, Unpublished Edition mNairobi, Kenya

Murigi P (2013) The influence of head teachers’ leadership styles on pupils’ performance in Muranga County, Unpublished Edition Nairobi, Kenya

Messick, P. & Krammer, G. (2014) What to consider in Strategy Implementation, Thomson South-Western, Mason, London, UK

Naeem, D. & Tayyeb, T. (2014) Generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27 No.3, pp.467-488.

Noble, P. & Mokwa, J. (2014) Strategic Marketing in a competitive Environment, Cengage Learning India Private Limited, Alps Building,1st Floor,56 Janpath ,New Delhi 110 001

Northouse, P. (2015).Strategy Implementation in a Competitive Business Environment, Journal of Accounting and Economics. (33): 78-81

Ogbeide, J. & Harrington, P. (2011) The relationship among participative management style, strategy implementation, success and financial performance in the food service industry in the United States of America, Journal of Strategic Management. Vol. 50(1) 12-30

Owino, P. (2013) The leadership challenges in education in Kenya, Unpublished Edition Nairobi, Kenya

Otieno, G. (2011) The challenges facing the effective operations of the education sector in Kenya, Unpublished Edition Nairobi, Kenya

Pielstick, C.D. (2015). The transforming leader: A meta-ethnographic analysis. Community College Review, 26(3), 15-34.

Roesner, J. (2013). Leading Conflict? Linkages between Leader Behaviors and Group Conflict. Small Group Research, Vol. 37, No. 4, 377-403

Robbins, T. (2013) Strategic Management, How to involve the surbodinated, John Wisley, Toronto, Canada

Ronald, P .M ((2014), Strategy – making in three modes, California Management Review, Vol No. 2 PP 44-53.

Stein P (2012) The factors affecting the selection of leadership styles, Oxford University Press. Oxford: 456–765.

Spreitzer, D. (2014) A simple guide to strategy, Journal of Strategic Management. 50 No.1, pp.12-3..,

Waititu, P. & Gature, D.N (2014) The influence of organizational leadership on competitiveness of Public Universities in Kenya revealed that the Kenyan and other African Universities, ACME Publications, Nairobi, Kenya

Yukl, G. (2014) An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285-305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00013-2 References




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i4.962

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.