EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AS A STRATEGY FOR PRODUCTIVITY AMONG PUBLIC SERVANTS: A CASE OF KAKAMEGA COUNTY

ANTHONY MUTEVANE KIKUBU, MALENYA A. ABRAHAM, DR. DOUGLAS MUSIEGA

Abstract


The purpose of this research was to evaluate the impact of performance appraisal on productivity in the public service.  The research  was motivated  by the fact that there  had been concerted efforts to correct the scenario  of declining  performance of the public  service. The Government of Kenya adopted, as a policy, the application of performance Contracts in the management of the Public Service.  Having  adopted Performance  Management   in most  of the Ministries by the year 2006, research had been  carried out mainly  among  recipients of the service  to establish its  effectiveness in service delivery. This research was carried out among public servants working at Kakamega County. The target population was 112 respondents on Job group J and above whose statistics were available at the County Governor/Commissioner's office. Descriptive research design was used.   Primary data was collected by use of structured questionnaires, with closed ended questions; 100 questionnaires were issued. They were  reviewed  for completeness   and validity, coded  and keyed  into the computer  for analysis  using  Statistical  Package  for Social  Sciences  (SPSS). Percentile comparisons, frequency  tables,  pie  charts  and  various  types  of graphs were used  for  presentation of  findings.

Findings showed Performance appraisal had a positive influence in making respondents more transparent to their clients.   

Key Words: Performance appraisal, productivity, Kakamega County


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akaranga, E. M. (2008). The process and effects of performance contracting in Kenyan public sector, United States International University (USIU), Nairobi.

Armstrong, M. and Baron, A. (2004). Managing performance: performance management in action. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Bogdan, R. C. and Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon.

Bouckaert, G.Verhoest, K and De Corte, J (1999) Public sector performance contracting in

Belgium and Flanders, Public Management Centre, Catholic University. Leuven.

Chapman, A. (1995) "Performance Appraisals" http://www.businessballs.comlperformanceappraisals.htm

Denzin N. (2006). Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. Aldine Transaction. 5th edition. Elmore, R. F (2007) "When good policies go bad: political accountability and quality of service in education". Oxford, UK

Government of Kenya (2010). Performance Contracting Guidelines ih Edition. Government Printer, Nairobi

Hoogwout, M. (2005). Towards a general theory on customer oriented government Nijmegen. Tilburg University, Tilburg Institute on Law, Technology and Society.

"International Public Management Review" (2009).

http://www.ipmr.netVolume 10' Issue 2' 2009 electronic Journal at

Kobia, M and Mohammed, N, (2006). Towards an effective delivery of public services in Africa. The Kenyan experience with performance contracting. 28th AAP AM Annual

Roundtable Conference, Arusha, Tanzania.

Kothari (2004) Research Methodology. New Age International. Log Associates (2010). Evaluation of Performance Contracting.

Lucey, T. (1991). Management Information Systems. 6th Edition. DP Publication Ltd.

Melese, F Blandin, J. and O'Keefe, S. (2004). "A new management model for government: Integrating Activity Based Costing, the Balanced Scorecard, and Total Quality Management with the Planning, Programming and Budgeting System." International Public Management Review.

Mugenda, 0 and Mugenda, A (1999) Research Methods. Nairobi University Press.

Murray, P. (2002). A framework for public sector performance contracting: OECD Publications

Musa, P. (2001) " contract plans and public enterprise performance" Tangier, Morocco.

Muthaura, F. (2008). Restoring and building trust in government through innovations to promote quality of public service. Government Printer.

Njogu, B. (2010). Implementation strategies, challenges and practical solutions". African

Training and Research Centre in Administration for Development (CAFRAD)

Obong'o, S. (2009). Implementation of performance contracting in Kenya. International Public Management Review' electronic Journal at http://www.ipmr.net Volume 10 . Issue 2 . 2009

Panel of Experts. (2010). Review of Performance Contracting.

PAS Booklet. (2009). Notes on Implementation of the Performance Appraisal System.

Performance Contracting Department. (2010) Office of the Prime Minister. Government Printer.

Peil, M. (1995). Research Methods. A Handbook for Africa. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers.

Peters, T. (1987). Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution. London: Macmillan, publishers.

Petri, U. and Petri, V. (1999). Public sector performance contracting in Finland.

Public Management Department, Finnish Ministry of Finance DECD, 1999

Poister, T. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Saunders, M. Lewis, P and Thornhill, A (2009) Research Methods for Business Students, 4th Edition, FT Prentice Hall, London.

Sonja, E. (1999) Public Sector Performance Contracting In New Zealand: New Zealand. OEeD Publication.

Transparency International. (2011) "Transparency in public service delivery" http://www.transparency.org/regional_pages/africa_middle_east/_ 28 May 2011

Trivedi, P. (2000). How to evaluate performance of government agency: a manual for practitioners. World Bank.

UNDG. (2004) http://www.undg.orglindex.cfm?P=252. 2 June 2011

Walonick, D. S. (1993). http://statpac.orglwalonicklsystems-theory.htm General Systems Theory

Wangao, E. (2010), Public Sector Reforms & Performance Contracting .CASE STUDY: KENYA (2010)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i4.964

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.