THE INFLUENCE OF DEVOLUTION IN STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES IN KENYA: A CASE STUDY OF EMBU COUNTY

JOSEPH WAITHITU THUKU

Abstract


The constitution of Kenya (2010) introduced a devolved system of governance which entrenches health as a right for every citizen, to the highest attainable, standard of health.  It Include the right to reproductive health.  Further, it also designates the health services functions of the national and county governments as well as principles under which such services should be provided.  Following the first general elections under the constitution of Kenya (2010) and creation of county governments, the need to address the administration, planning and management of health care services in response to the changes became imminent. The aim of this study was to establish the effects of devolution in strategy implementation of health care services.  The specific objective was to establish the influence of devolution in strategy implementation of health care services. The study adopted a descriptive and explanatory research design since these tools allow the use of the gathered primary and secondary data. A simple random sampling was used for the study. Population can be defined as “any group of people, or observation, or test in which we happen to be interested (Bell 1997).  Embu County has a total of 74 public health facilities; however for this study 24 health facilities were selected. The data obtained was analysed using descriptive and inferential, statistical analysis.  The study established that devolution of health care services plays a significant role in implementing the primary health care strategy of increased responsiveness of health systems to local needs.  It recommends that county governments should establish an enabling environment that is marked by the will and commitment of all health stakeholders, cogent strategy that addresses well articulated building blocks and a well thought out implementation process.

Key words: Devolution, Health Care Services, Strategy implementation, County Governments.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrew C.T, Health Reform Around the World, 2002.

Burton R.M De Sanctus G, Obel B; Organization Design, A step-by –step Approach, 2004.

Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of medicine, Crossing the Quality Chasm, 2013 hhp//www.nap.edu/catalog/10027.htm2013.

Grundy J, Healy V, Gorgolon L, Candig E, Overview of the devolution of Health Services in the Philippines, 2003.

Gwyn B, The impacts of asymmetric devolution on health care in the four countries of U.K 2014

Kenneth O, Devolution, challenges and opportunities for Kenya’s Health sector 2013

KPMG, Devolution of Health Care services in Kenya, conference report.

Mugambi L., implementation Devolution in Kenya: challenges and opportunities: two months on, 2013.

Mwamunye MK, Nyamu H.M, Devolution of Health Care system in Kenya, A strategic approach and its implementation in Mombasa County, Kenya – International journal (2014), Vol. 2 263 – 268.

Regmik k. Naidoo J, Pilkingtom P.A Greer A, Decentralization and district health services in Nepal, understanding the views of service users and service providers, 2010.

Republic of Kenya, Kenya Health Analysis Trends and Distribution, 1994 – 2010 and projections to 2030, Ministry of Medical Services and Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation.

Richard B.S, Vaida B, Karsten V, Decentralization in Health care, strategies and outcomes, 2006

Sian, E.M, Abigail M, Kerry J., four parts of one whole; The National Health Service (NHS) Post Devolution, 2008.

Uchimura H., Jutting J., Decentralization in Asian Health Sectors, Friends or foe, OECD Development Centre, 2006.

US Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration, Developing and Implementing a Quality Implementation Plan, 2011.

WHO, health systems decentralization’ Geneva, WHO, 1990.

WHO, working together for health, world Health Report, 2006.

World Bank, Delivering Primary Health Services in devolved health systems in Kenya, challenges and opportunities, World Bank 2014, hhp//documents.worldbank.org.curate/en/2014/09/2035156.

Yuhani E.L., Decentralization and Devolution, what do they mean? 2010




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v1i2.58

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.