THE EFFECT OF SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN KENYA

SILAS JAMES OWUOR

Abstract


Supply chain risk management has gained popularity in recent years. Every organization tries to optimize the performance of their supply chain by managing any possible interference and disturbances which can possibly prevent the achievement of predefined objectives. This study sought to determine the effects of supply chain risk management practices on supply performance of public universities in Kenya. The study adopted a correlation research design on a sample of 55 procurement personnel from 10 selected public universities in Kenya. Multiple regression analysis of the data indicated that there is a moderate positive relationship (R=0.695) relationship between supply chain risk management practices and supply chain performance of public universities in Kenya, and also that 48.3% of supply chain performance of public universities in Kenya is accounted for by Supply chain risk management practices (R2=0.483). The study therefore concluded that supply chain risk management practices moderately affects the supply chain performance of public universities in Kenya. It was therefore recommended that public universities need to invest on the risk management aspects of their supply chains so as to realize improved performance.

Key Word: Supply Chain Risk Management, Public Universities in Kenya 

 

CITATION: Owuor, S. J. O (2019). The effect of supply chain risk management practices on the supply chain performance of public universities in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 6 (2), 18 – 24.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amemba, C. S. (2013). The Effect of Implementing Risk Management Strategies on Supply Chain Performance: A Case of Kenya Medical Supplies Agency. European Journal of Business and Management 5(14), 2013

Accenture (2010). A new era of sustainability: UN-Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study 2010. Accenture

Antoncic , B. & Prodan, I. (2008). Alliances, corporate technological entrepreneurship and firm performance: Testing a Model on manufacturing Firms. Technovation, 28, 257-65.

Antoncic, B. & Scarlat, C. (2005). Corporate entrepreneurship and organizational performance: A Comparison between Slovenia and Romania. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Faculty of Management Koper. Slovenia, Congress Centre Bernardin, Slovenia, 24-26 November, 2005. Bernardin: Faculty of Management Koper.

Badasha Kamalpreet. (2012). Public sector unprepared for supply chain problems. Supply Chain management

Githinji, K. (2012). Logistics outsourcing and supply chain performance: a survey of universities in Nairobi County. Masters project, University of Nairobi.

Hadi, S. and Wood, L. C. (2012). Improving hotel performance through active supply chain management: A preliminary model. International conference of organizational innovation.

Kumar, C. & Nambirajan, T. (2013). An Integrated model for supply chain management components, supply chain performance and organizational performance: Purification and validation of a measurement Instrument. The Journal of Contemporary Management Research, 8(2), 37-56.

Lu, D. (2011). Fundamentals of supply chains.[Online] Available at: [Accessed 01 September 2014].

Wagner, S. M. and Bode, C. (2008). An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 307-326

Manuj, I., and J. T. Mentzer. 2008a. “Global Supply Chain Risk Management.” Journal of Business Logistics 29 (1): 133–155.

Ritchie, B., and C. Brindley. 2007a. “Supply Chain Risk Management and Performance: A Guiding Framework for Future Development.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27 (3): 303–322.

Ritchie, B., and C. Brindley. 2007b. “An Emergent Framework for Supply Chain Risk Management and Performance Measurement.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 58 (11): 1398–1411.

Stank, T., S. B. Keller, and D. J. Closs. 2001. “Performance Benefits of Supply Chain Logistical Integration.” Transportation Journal 41 (2/3): 32–46.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v6i2.1087

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.