EFFECT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT IN MONITORING AND EVALUATION ON THE SUCCESS OF COUNTY WATER PROJECTS IN UASIN GISHU COUNTY

NELSON KIPKEMEI MARITIM, DR. ROSE BOIT (Ph.D)

Abstract


This research aimed at determining the effect of community involvement in monitoring and evaluation on the success of county water projects in Uasin Gishu County. This study was guided by the theory of citizen involvement. The study focused on water projects funded by the County Government to represent all other projects. The target population of the study was 821 respondents from different sectors which included 520 County Development Committee, 95 Contractors, 30 ward administrators, 57 area chiefs, 7 water engineers, 6 architects, 95 project managers and 11 quantity surveyors. A sample size of 484 respondents was selected using a stratified sampling. These were 226 County Development Committee, 77 Contractors, 30 ward administrators, 50 area chiefs, 7 water engineers, 6 architects, 77 project managers and 11 quantity surveyors. The data was collected from primary sources. The study used structured questionnaires to collect data from the respondents. The study employed both descriptive and inferential statistical methods to analyze data. There was a statistical significant effect of community monitoring and evaluation on performance of county water projects in Uasin Gishu County (β= 0.408, p=0.000<0.05). The study concluded that community involvement strategy has positive effect on the success of water projects. The study concluded that modernization theory can be applied in projects to show how the community members are guided in contributing towards project success. In this way, monitoring and evaluation is important in the board of projects scope, time, cost, quality, human resource, correspondence and risks. It was recommended that to ensure success of the projects, project managers have to mostly involve community members in monitoring and evaluation, employ their workforce from the community and involve community members in planning and budgeting.

Key Words: Community Involvement, Monitoring and Evaluation, Water Projects

CITATION: Maritim, N. K., & Boit, R. (2019). Effect of community involvement in monitoring and evaluation on the success of county water projects in Uasin Gishu County. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 6 (2), 1317 –1328.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aira, E. A. (2016). Factor’s influencing performance of non-governmental organizations projects in the urban informal settlements: A case of Undugu society of Kenya. Nairobi County.

Basheka, B. C., & Byamugisha, A. (2015). The state of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) as a discipline in Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 8(3), 75-95.

Beierle, T. C., & Konisky, D. M. (2001). What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environment and planning C: Government and Policy, 19(4), 515-527.

Box, R. C. (1997). Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities into the 21st Century. Sage Publications.

Braxton, J. M., Jones, W. A., Hirschy, A. S., & Hartley III, H. V. (2008). The role of active learning in college student persistence. New directions for teaching and learning, 2008(115), 71-83.

Bryman, A. (2008). Of methods and methodology. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 159-168.

Buchy, M., & Race, D. (2001). The Twists and Turns of Community Participation in Natural Resource Management in Australia: What is Missing?. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(3), 293-308.

Chin, C. M. M. (2012). Development of a Project Management Methodology for Use in a University-industry Collaborative Research Environment (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Nottingham, Semenyih Selangor DarulEhsan, Malaysia.

Cogan, A., Sharpe, S., & Hertzberg, J. (1986). Citizen participation. International City Managers' Association/American Planning Association, Chicago, 283-305.

Day, D. (1997). Citizen Participation in the Planning Process: An Essentially Contested Concept?. Journal of Planning Literature, 11(3), 421-434.

DeGroff, A., & Cargo, M. (2009). Policy implementation: Implications for evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2009(124), 47-60.

Dungumaro, E. W., &Madulu, N. F. (2003). Public Participation in Integrated Water Resources Management: The Case of Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 28(20-27), 1009-1014.

Gall, M. D. (1989). Gall. JP, & Borg, WR (2007). Educational research: An introduction, 8.

Georgieva, S., & Allan, G. (2008). Best Practices in Project Management Through a Grounded Theory Lens. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1).

Gwadoya, R. A. (2012). Factors Influencing Effective Implementation of Monitoring and Evaluation Practices in Donor Funded Projects in Kenya: a Case of Turkana District. Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.

Hwang, B. G., & Lim, E. S. J. (2012). Critical Success Factors for Key Project Players and Objectives: Case Study of Singapore. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), 204-215.

Ika, L. A., Diallo, A., &Thuillier, D. (2012). Critical Success Factors for World Bank projects: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Project Management, 30(1), 105-116.

Mize, J. J. (1972). Factors affecting meat purchases and consumer acceptance of ground beef at three fat levels with and without soya-bits.

Mulwa, F. W. (2004). Managing Community-based Development: Unmasking the Mystery of Participatory Development. P. Olivex.

Mulwa, F. W. (2008). Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Community Projects: Community Based Project Monitoring, Qualitative Impact Assessment, and People-Friendly Evaluation Methods.

Muthuri, J. N., Moon, J., & Idemudia, U. (2012). Corporate innovation and sustainable community development in developing countries. Business & Society, 51(3), 355-381.

Nguyen, L., Ogunlana, S. O., &ThiXuanLan, D. (2004). A Study on Project Success Factors in Large Construction Projects in Vietnam. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(6), 404-413.

Nour, A. M. (2011). Challenges and Advantages of Community Participation as an Approach for Sustainable Urban Development in Egypt. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(1), 79.

Orodho, J. A. (2009). Elements of education and social science research methods. Nairobi/Maseno, 126-133.

Papke-Shields, K. E., Beise, C., & Quan, J. (2010). Do project managers practice what they preach, and does it matter to project success?. International journal of project management, 28(7), 650-662.

Prabhakar, G. P. (2009). What is roject Success: a Literature Review. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), 3.

Rahman, S. U., & Bullock, P. (2005). Soft TQM, hard TQM, and organisational performance relationships: an empirical investigation. Omega, 33(1), 73-83.

Shackleton, S., Campbell, B., Wollenberg, E., & Edmunds, D. (2002). Devolution and Community-Based Natural Resource Management: Creating Space for Local People to Participate and Benefit. Natural Resource Perspectives, 76(1), 1-6.

Stivers, C. (1990). The Public Agency as Polis: Active Citizenship in the administrative State. Administration & Society, 22(1), 86-105.

Trenam, K. (2000). Public Consultation in Local Environment Agency Plans (LEAPS). Landscape Research, 25(3), 382-385.

Widianingsih, I., & Morrell, E. (2007). Participatory planning in Indonesia: seeking a new path to democracy. Policy Studies, 28(1), 1-15.

Yamane, Taro. (1967). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v6i2.1187

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.