EFFECT OF CUSTOMS ADMINISTRATION STRATEGIES ON CROSS BORDER LOGISTICS EFFICIENCY IN EAST AFRICA MEMBER COUNTRIES. A CASE OF KENYAN BORDERS WITH UGANDA AND TANZANIA

FELIX KILONZI, DR. ROBERT ODUNGA (Ph.D), DR. YUSUF KIBET (Ph.D)

Abstract


The main purpose of the research study was to establish the effect of customs administration on cross border logistics efficiency among East African member states. The study used an explanatory research design and the total population for the study was Uganda and Tanzania borders. The study targeted 51 senior staff, 94 middle management staff and 141 junior staff. The sample size was 47 senior staff, 92 middle management staff and139 junior staff. Questionnaires were the major data collection instruments. The data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings showed a strong and positive relationship between custom harmonization and cross border logistics efficiency. There was a strong and positive relationship between custom automation and cross border logistics efficiency. There was also a strong and positive relationship between cross-border management and cross border logistics efficiency. The findings also showed a very strong and positive relationship between capacity improvement and cross border logistics efficiency. The results implied that every per unit increase in custom harmonization leads to 0.193 increase in cross border logistics efficiency. An increase in custom automation leads to 0.096 increase in cross border efficiency. A unit increase in cross border management leads to 0.310 increases in cross border efficiency. A unit increase in capacity improvement leads to 0.225 increase in cross border logistics efficiency. The study concluded that there had been little improvement in cross border logistics efficiency. Automated coding system had greatly improved cross border logistics efficiency. Centralized customs among the member countries had made movement of goods more efficient. The study recommended that member states should come up with a policy that reduces time of clearing goods by harmonizing the custom procedures. East Africa member states should improve on automated system to ensure that it identifies all goods passing through the border posts. EAC member states should come up with policies that eliminate gaps in sharing of information. East African member states should regularly train their staff on emerging trend in cross border logistics management.

Key Words: Custom Harmonization, Customs Automation, Cross-Border Management, Capacity Improvement

CITATION: Kilonzi, F., Odunga, R., & Kibet, Y. (2019). Effect of customs administration strategies on cross border logistics efficiency in East Africa member countries. A case of Kenyan borders with Uganda and Tanzania. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 6 (4), 1397 – 1415.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Barron ,A.H & Lisa J.S (2013). "Belarus eases current account deficit with Custom Union, Common Economic Space" European Journal of Business and Management, 7 106-114.

Baron, M.N & Mathieu, H.K (2013), ‘PCS interoperability in Europe: a market for PCS operators? ’The International Journal of Logistics Management, 24 117–29.

Busse, M.S, Hoekstra & R.K, Königer, J.S (2012) ‘The impact of aid for trade facilitation on the costs of trading’, Kyklos, 65 143–63.

Buyonge, C.K & Kireeva I.K (2008). Trade Facilitation in Africa: Challenges and Possible Solutions. World Customs Journal, 2 41 – 54.

Grainger, A.M (2011), ‘Trade facilitation: a conceptual review’, Journal of World Trade, 45 39–62. Han, C.K & Ireland R.N (2014) ‘Performance measurement of the KCS customs selectivity system’, Risk Management, vol. 16 25–43.

Hausman, W.C, Lee, H.N, Napier, G.C, Thompson, A.K & Zheng, Y.Z (2010) ‘A process analysis of global trade management: an inductive approach’, Journal of Supply Chain Management 46 5–29.

Hoekman, B.C & Nicita, A.K (2010) ‘Assessing the Doha Round: market access, transactions costs and aid for trade facilitation’, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 9 65-79

Hossain, S.N (2009), ‘Bangladesh Customs: managing risk for better trade’, Global Trade and Customs Journal 4 45-51

Kassee, D.K (2014). The WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitation: Status of Play in Southern African Customs. World Customs Journal 8 101-112.

Kafeero, E.M (2008). Customs and Trade Facilitation in the East African Community (EAC). World Customs Journal, 2 120

Kombo, P.K, & Tromp, S.L (2006). Business Research Methods, U.S.A, New York, McGraw-Hill Publisher

Kunz, N.M Reiner, G.S, & Gold, S.P (2014) ‘Investing in disaster management capabilities versus pre-Positioning inventory: a new approach to disaster preparedness’, International Journal of Production Economics, 157 261–72.

Liu, S.V & Guangping M.N (2008). Review on the implementation of the Second-step Development Strategy for the Establishment of the Modern Customs System. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mann, C.K (2012) ‘Supply chain logistics, trade facilitation and international trade: A macroeconomic policy view’, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48 7–14.

Matsuda, S (2012), ‘The time release study as a performance measurement tool for a supply chain and an international corridor’, World Customs Journal, 6 79–92.

Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, O., (2003). Research Methods: ,Kenya, Nairobi, ACTS Publishers.

Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, O., (1999). Research Methods: Kenya, Nairobi, ACTS Publishers

Ndonga, D.K (2013). Managing the Risk of Corruption in Customs through Single Window Systems. World Customs Journal, 7 (2), 23 – 38.

Pauwelyn, J.S (2009), ‘Nothing dramatic (regarding administration of customs laws)’, World Trade Review, vol. 8 (1) 45-48

Peil, S.K (2005). Research Methodology and Design. , U.S.A, New York, Macmillan. Publishers

Tesfaye, DN, & Walter, K. J (2017) Africa’s Regional Integration Arrangements; New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tosevska-Trpcevska, K. S (2014). Effects of the Implementation of Single Window and Simplified World Trade Review 8 45-48

Tumbarello, P. S & Patrizia, N.K (2014)“ Regional Trade Integration and WTO accession in the CIS: Which is the right Sequencing,” IMF Working Paper Customs Procedures in the Republic of Macedonia. World Customs Journal, 8 51-62.

Widdowson, D.O, Blegen, B. M, Kashubsky, M.J & Grainger, A.L (2014) ‘Review of accredited operator Schemes: an Australian study’, World Customs Journal, 1 17–34.

World Trade Organization (WTO) (2014) ‘Agreement on Trade Facilitation’ (WT/L/931), in Preparatory Committee on Trade Facilitation (ed.), WTO, and Geneva.

Xu, J.S, Notteboom, T.K Baron, M.L & Mathieu, H.M (2013) ‘PCS interoperability in Europe: a market for PCS operators?’ The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 24 117–29.

Zhang, S. K (2009), ‘TRS as a measurement of trade facilitation: the experience of Customs in the Asia Pacific Region’, World Customs Journal 3 125-34




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v6i4.1477

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.