INFLUENCE OF NETWORK STRUCTURE ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF MEDIUM SIZED ENTERPRISES KENYA

DOROTHY KIRIMI

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of network structure on financial performance of medium sized enterprises in Kenya. A descriptive survey design was adopted. The target population was drawn from 51 medium sized enterprises in Kenya which participated in the KPMG top 100 mid-sized ranking for the period 2011 to 2015. Multi stage, systematic and purposive sampling was used to select a sample of 255 which had the data needed in the study. Primary data was collected using questionnaires which were pretested for reliability and validity to determine it suitability for use in the study. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used in the analysis of data to generate frequency distribution of the responses and descriptive statistics. It was found that network structure was positively and significantly related to financial performance. The finding lends support to the social network theory, indicating that the more networks the entrepreneur is linked to the more it will affect financial performance. The study findings were that alliances, partnerships, collaborations, or networking assisted the entrepreneur with an access to other individuals’ links. Thus, there will be an extended web of associations that will ultimately lead to identification of new prospects and a broader network of customers and clients. This was evidenced by the responses from the respondents who participated in the study. The findings encourage managers to engage in active networking with different actors within and outside of existing networks and especially with those who are relevant to the business in which the manag­er and a firm operate. The results strongly support the necessity for managers to create ac­tive co-operational relationships. The study concluded that an individual can be constrained in a network if they have too few contacts; has contacts closely connected with one another; or shares information indirectly via a central contact. It can thus be settled that businesses with larger advantage-generating or advantage-improving capacities could gain more from solid network structure, while those with inferior abilities are better off if they form coalition with enterprises from distant network groups, and hence forming a network structure endowed with comprehensive entrepreneurial networks. The study recommended that medium enterprises should become entrenched in various forms of network structure since through this they can track varied competitive approach. It is also recommended that medium sized enterprises in Kenya invest in networking activities, close interconnections and suitable resource partners that would ensure that they maintain a key network behavior which is aligned to the industry leaders.

Key Words: Network Structure, Financial Performance, Medium Sized Enterprises, Entrepreneurial Networks

CITATION: Kirimi, D. G. (2020). Influence of network structure on financial performance of medium sized enterprises Kenya.  The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 7(2), 189 – 204.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayyagari M., Demirguc-Kunt A., & Maksimovic V.(2011). Small vs. young firms across the world : contribution to employment, job creation, and growth. Policy Research Working Paper 5631. The World Bank Development Research Group

Birley,S., Cromie ,S.& Meyers, A. (1991). Experimental Networks: Their Emergence in Ireland and oversees. International Small Business Journal , 4 ( 9),56-74.

Black, F. (2002). Implications of the random walk hypothesis for portfolio management. Financial Analysts Journal 27(2), 16–22.

Brealey, S., Myers, C. &Marcus, A. J. (2009). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, (6th ed.) U.S.A, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.

Caldwell, D.(2013). Mid-sized companies show real pulse of economy. Retrieved 5th April, 2017 from http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/02/24/medium-size-companies-cnbc/1938679/

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Davis, L. R. (2007). Maintaining competition in copying: narrowing the scope of Gene patents. Cornell Law faculty publications paper 126 Retrieved on 7th May, 2016 from http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu//isipon.

Edwards, P., Edwards, S., & Benzel, R. (2007). Teaming Up: The Small-Business Guide to Collaborating with Others to Boost Your Earnings and Expand Your Horizons. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

Fatima, Ali & Arif (2012).Network classification on the basis of functions they perform and its relationship with internationalization process of SMEs in developing countries. Australian Journal of business and Management Research 1(8)35-53.

Ford, D. G. & Koch, D. (1998). Managing Business Relationships. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Gaudici, A. (2013).Sensing together: an exploration of the support of network intermediaries to firms’ and entrepreneurs’ search for new opportunities. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Cranfield University. UK.

Granovetter, M.D.(2004). The Influence of Social Structures on Economic Development. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1), 33-50.

Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B.(2003). Network-Based Research in Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review. Journal of Business Venturing 18(2),165–187.

Kiraka, R. N. (2013) The Role of Women in Enterprise Development in Africa. Paper Presented at Women in Entrepreneurship International Conference, Accra, Ghana, 4th-7th April, 2013.

Kiriinya, S. N & Kirimi ,D.K(2016).Marketing Challenges By SMEs in Kenya. International Journal of Research in Finance and Marketing.5 (10) 55-63.

Koch, R. (1998). The 80/20 Principle: The secret of achieving more with less. New York: Doubleday.

Kothari, C. (2014). Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques . (2nd ed.) New Delhi, New Age International Publishers.

Korir, J., Schulz, R (2012). Effects of network structure on performance of minor event management ventures in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 1(8) 34–45.

KPMG (2013) Kenya Top 100 2013/14 Winner announced. Retrieved on 10th April,2016 http://www.kpmg.com/eastafrica/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/pages/kenyatop100201314winnerannounced.aspx.

Krueger, N. F. (2007). The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(3), 5-23.

Mc Cormick, D.(1996). Small Enterprise: Flexibility and Networking in an African Context. Nairobi :Longman.

Mukherjee, P. (2014), "How Chilling Are Network Externalities? The Role of Network Structure," International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31 (4), 452-456.

Mugenda, O.M., & Mugenda A.G. (2003). Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches (2nd ed.). Nairobi: Acts Press.

Mungania, A. K., Gakure R. W., & Karanja, K (2017). Effects of Outsourcing as a Business Linkage on the Growth of Dairy Enterprises: A Survey of Dairy Enterprises in Mount Kenya Region. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management.5 (5) 445-473.

Mwirigi, F. M. (2012). Role of Supply Chain Relationships in the Growth of Small Firms in Kenya. PhD published thesis retrieved on 5th May, 2016 from http://ir.jkuat.ac.ke/bitstream.

Obura, J.M, Abeka, E.O and Obure, A (n.d). Networks, micro small enterprises (MSEs) and Performance in Journal of Development Entrepreneurship. World Scientific Publishing Co

Parida, Westerbery, Ylinenpaa, & Roininen, (2010) Exploring the effects of network configurations on entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: an empirical study of new ventures and small firms. Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship 5601-5614

Peprah. J (2010) Sustainable entrepreneurship: The role of networking .Retrieved on 3rd February 2016 from https://www.uclan.ac.uk/research/explore/.../igfd_sustainable_entrepreneurship

Pittaway, L., Robertos, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D. & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5(6), 137-168.

Putnam, R. D., (1993a). The prosperous community’. The American Prospect , 4(13), 35-42.

Republic of Kenya (2009). Economic Survey. Nairobi: Government Printer.

Republic of Kenya (2012). Economic Survey. Nairobi: Government Printer.

Republic of Kenya. (2011). Economic Survey. Nairobi: Government Printer.

Santos, F. & Eisenhardt, K.M. (2009). Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal. 52(4) 643–671.

Setyawati, S., Mohd, S., Mohd, N.,& Saud, M.(2011). Effects of learning, networking and innovation adoption on successful entrepreneurs in Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (5),149-156.

Smelser, N. J., & Baltes, P. B. (2001). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Exeter, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Smilor, R., & Gill, M. (1986). The new business incubator: linking talent, technology, capital, and know-how. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Stam W. (2010). Industry event participation and network brokerage among entrepreneurial ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 625-653.

Subramani, M. R., & Rajagopalan, B. (2003). Knowledge-sharing and influence in online social networks via viral marketing. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 300-307.

Teng, C. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: a resource based approach toward competitive advantages. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1),119-142.

Thomas, S. L. (2012). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. Journal of Higher Education. 71(5), 591–615.Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage publications Inc.

Thrikawala, S. (2011). Influence of Strategic Networks for the Success of SMEs in Sri Lanka (May 1, 2011). World Journal of Social Sciences,1(2),108 -119, Retrieved on 15th January ,2015 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2333280.

Terziovski, M. (2003). The Relationship between Networking Practices and Business Excellence: A Study of Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Measuring Business Excellence, 7(2): 78-92.

Waiganjo E.W, Mukulu,E. & Kahiri, J. (2012). Relationship between Strategic Human Resource Management and Firm Performance of Kenya’s Corporate Organizations. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2 (10),62-70.

Wiklund, J. & Sheperd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach.Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (1) ,71-91

Willimack, D.K (2002).Understanding unit and item non response in business surveys. , New York:Wiley Inter science.

Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9),809-825.

Zandi, T. ( 2006). Reliability, validity and factor structure of the GDS-15 in Iranian elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 21( 4),588-593.

Zikmund, W. G. (2010). Business Research Methods (7th.ed.).Cincinnati, OH: Thompson /South Western.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v7i2.1620

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.