INTRINSIC FACTORS AFFECTING DIGITAL INCLUSION IN HIGHER LEARNING INSTITUTIONS AMONG STAFF AND STUDENTS IN NAIROBI COUNTY

SARAH ATIEN0 OSIDA, ELISHA TOYNE O. OPIYO

Abstract


The adoption of digital has started to massively increase within the education sector for knowledge; this is evident in huge investments in computers for classrooms and training of teachers to use technology while teaching. The implementation of digital technologies in the world has improved both quality and inclusion among the higher learning institutions which has facilitated the growth of internet, web browsing and allowed high access in the media and communication. In Kenya, while the e-learning has been adopted in the creation of virtual universities, only a few universities have adopted digital inclusion. Up to now a good number of students find it difficult to use e-learning due to poor and weak technological infrastructure in place. Learning has been based on face to face. There is lack of clear policies on e-learning, while learning activities is only accessed by the students available on the campus and not to all the students that cannot afford accommodation. The learning methods being used are traditional models of education which is based on face to face interaction between students and lecturers. This indicates that digital inclusion is not being practiced. The government of Kenya is still to make investments in the ICT sector at the university level, investments on high speed networks and installation of a large number of computers has not been implemented. Individuals may have limited experience, lack of skills or lack of willingness to use ICT, low education leads to low income which leads to low affordability and use of ICTs. Therefore, it is not very clear that ICT is being widely adopted and used at the higher education level. The aim of this study was to examine the intrinsic factors affecting digital inclusion in higher learning institutions among staff and students in Nairobi County. A descriptive survey comprising both qualitative and quantitative data was used in this study. The results showed ICT skills, Access to digital, e-channels used in teaching and government policies were important factors to Digital Inclusion implementation. The research examined Digital Inclusion in the context of Kenyan public higher learning institutions where it is not fully implemented and therefore may not adequately cover the process in other higher learning institutions. Digital Inclusion could be used to gain competitive advantage in a cost effective manner thus need to enhance successful implementation. The study sought to provide a better understanding on the intrinsic factors affecting digital inclusion in the higher learning institutions among staff and students in Nairobi County, where institutional policy makers use it as an experiential tool to strengthen their government-institution relationship.  The results contribute to the body of research on implementation of Digital Inclusion.

Key Words: Digital Inclusion, Higher Education, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), ICT for Teaching, ICT for Learning

CITATION Osida, S. A., & Opiyo, E. T. O. (2022). Intrinsic factors affecting digital inclusion in higher learning institutions among staff and students in Nairobi County. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 9 (3), 316 -324. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Australian National Training Authority (2016). Literature review: Digital Divide Access and Equity in online learning.

Bonilla, M.H, Prietto, N. (2011). Formica de professors: as tic estatura dynamics circulates Horizontal. In B, Araujo r K, S. Freitas, Eduardo.

Brown, C, Sienkiewicz, L (2010) Debunking the “digital native” beyond digital appointed, towards digital democracy. Journal of computer assisted learning 26/5/, 357369

Chinn, M, O, Four tie, R.W. (2014). The Determinants of the Global Digital Divide: Across country Analysis of computer and internet penetratioUs Santa Cruz: Department of economics, UCSC.

Correa, T. (2014) Literature review; Understanding the second-level Digital Divide,’’

Dias, L (2011), Inclusion Digital Como Factored Inclusion Social master dissertation Retrieved from Moodle

Gambaa. J, p. Liorense, t…Molina, r, canary, J, R, Fernandez, s, Rodin, o, Zapata-Rose-

Gomez (Ed.), University (2016). Analysis Della’s Tic en lass Universidad’s Espanola’s,(pg. 21-56) Madre; Cure Universidad Española

Gomez, R. (2012). LIBRARIES, Tele centers, cybercafés and public access to ICT: International Comparison, Hershey, PA, USA: Information science Reference.

Imelda, S. (2014). Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual Frameworks? Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 185–195.

Johnson A, Cummins S., Estrada M., Freeman V, R hall(2016), NMC horizon report; 2016 Higher Education Edition. Resolve document Austin; the new media Consortium

Karishma, B, (2020). African trade and covid-19, The Supply Chains Dimension African.Com 4, November 2020

Khalid, M, Buss, L. (2014) Arithmetical framework mapping barriers of integrating and adopting educational technology. In m, s. Khalid, secondary educational institutional centered diffusion of ICT in rural Bangladesh LPP 101-122. Augsburg Retrieved from http//vpn.aaal.clk hills/ Khalid 2014 PhD dissertation pat

Khalid, M, S (2016) Secondary Education Institution Centered Diffusion of ICT in Rural Bangladesh. Aalborg: Department of learning and philosophy, Augsburg University Retrieved from http/vpn 2014 PhD dissertation.

Liebenberg. H, Chetty, R, Prinsloo, L. (2012) student access to skills in using Technology in an open and distance learning content international review of researching in open and distance learning, 13(4), 250-268.

Mutua, J., Oteyo, I. N., & Njeru, A. W. (2013). The extent of e-commerce adoption among small and medium enterprises in Nairobi, Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(9), 116–122.

Nemer, D, Gross, S, True, And N. (2013) materialized in Brazil. In proceedings of the sixth international conference on information and communication Technologies and development: Notes- volume 2(pp.108-111) Retrieval from http:11/Texas, academia. Edu/Teresa Corel

Ricoy. C, Felix, T, R, M.J. (2013) the digital divide among the university freshmen. JOJET: The Furkish online journal of education at Technology, 12(2), 262-268.

Sims, J, Vidgen, R Powell, P (2008) E-learning and digital divide: perpetuating cultural and socio-economic elitism in Higher education. Communication of association for information systems (22(1) Retrieved from http/aisle aisnet org//cais/V012/1/23

Steven, w: (2015) Key School Communication Channels and how to use them. Oct 26.2015

Wanjau, K., Macharia N, R., &Ayodo Eunice M A. (2012). Factors affecting adoption of electronic commerce among small medium enterprises in Kenya: Survey of tour and travel firms in Nairobi. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 2(4), 76–91.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v9i3.2101

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.