DETERMINANTS OF EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION OF BROADBAND INFRASTUCTURE PROJECTS IN KENYA: A CASE OF NATIONAL OPTIC FIBRE BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT PHASE 1

RONALD O. MOENGA

Abstract


ICT is a key driver of economic growth, providing a boost of GDP growth in developing countries. The investment in broadband promotes competition, innovation and market growth. If well used, Optical fiber infrastructure has the potential to transform livelihoods as an enabler for economic and social growth. In low and middle income economies, a 10% growth in broadband penetration yields an additional 1.38 of GDP growth and for every 1 per cent increase in broadband penetration, productivity grows by 0.13%. Again, ICT broadband penetration has a positive impact on employment creation, data Indicates that employment growth varies widely, from 0.2 per cent to 5.32 per cent for every increase in 1 per cent of penetration. Suffice is to say, underutilization of the optical fiber backbone infrastructure project leaves a lot to be desired. The specific objectives of the study sought to examine how stakeholder participation, human resource capacity, government policy and implementation strategy influence utilization of Optical fiber infrastructure in Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive survey. The study targeted 35 top management staff of Orange telecom involved in maintenance of the optical fiber for backbone connectivity across major towns, 8 county government ICT directors (Kilifi, Mombasa, Kwale, Kitui, Machakos, Makueni, TaitaTaveta and Nairobi), 10 ICT board members involved in development of ICT policy and 20 managers of public and private institutions utilizing the project along Mombasa-Nairobi. A census was carried out by use of questionnaires to collect primary data. Secondary data was obtained from published documents. A pilot study was conducted using data collection instruments and SPSS V21 and Excel were used to analyse the collected qualitative and quantitative data. The study further adopted regression analysis at 5% level of significance to determine strength and direction of the relationship of the variables under study. The analysis showed that stakeholder participation had the strongest positive (Pearson correlation coefficient =.667) influence on effective utilization of ICT infrastructure projects. In addition, human resource capacity, implementation strategy and government policy were positively correlated to effective utilization of ICT infrastructure with Pearson correlation coefficient of .609, .601 and .555 with p-values of .020, .028, .009 and .037 respectively. The study established that stakeholder participation was the most significant factor. The study recommends that human resource capacity needs to enhanced for effective utilization of Optical Fiber infrastructure. There is need to have adequate technical staff to ensure that there is efficiency in theutilization of Optical Fiber infrastructurein the organization.The organizations need to adopt an ICT infrastructure implementation strategic plan for effective utilization of Optical Fiber infrastructure. The national ICT policy should articulate a strategic utilization roadmap for the deployed optical fiber ICT infrastructure.The study recommends that similar studies to be undertaken for other ICT infrastructure projects for generalization of the findings of this study.

Key Words: Stakeholder Participation, Human Resource Capacity, Government Policy, Implementation Strategy, Effective Utilization Of Broadband Infrastucture Projects


Full Text:

PDF

References


ADRA (2007). Monitoring and Evaluation Manual Prepared for ADRA International Prepared by TANGO International, Inc. March 2007

Agle, B. R., R. K. Mitchell & J.- A. Sonnenfeld: 2008, 'Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate performance, and CEO Values', Academy of Management Journal 42, 507-525.

Alex J., et al. “Three approaches to monitoring: feedback systems, participatory monitoring and evaluation and logical frameworks.” (August 2011).

Alex Jacobs. “Creating the Missing Feedback Loop.” Draft Report (June 2010).

Al-Kharashi, A. &Skitmore, M. (2009).Causes of delays in Saudi Arabian public sector construction projects.Construction Management and Economics, 27(1), 3-23.

Annie, E. C. (2009). Getting Started: A Self-Directed Guide to Outcome Map Development Exercise. Seattle: Organizational Research Services.

Armah. A. F., Yawson D. O., & Johanna A. O.,(2009). ‘The Gap Between Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Participation: The Case of Management of The Korle Lagoon, Ghana’, 5/1 Law, Environment and Development Journal (2009), p. 73, available at http://www.lead-journal.org/content/09073.pdf.

Awiti, P. V. (2008) 'An assessment of The Use and Management of Development Funds: The case of Constituencies Development Fund in Kenya'. MA thesis, Institute of Social Studies, The Hague.

Babbie, E. (2009). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wodsworth.

Bagaka, O. (2008). Fiscal decentralization in Kenya and the growth of government: The Constituency development fund. Northern Illinois University: De-Kalb Illinois.

Baker, Judy. 2000. Evaluating the Impact of Development Projects on Poverty: A Handbook for Practitioners.Directions in Development. Washington, D.C.: World Bank

Bank, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2809.

Bardhan, I. R., Krishnan, V. V., &Shu, L. (2007). Project Performance and the Enabling Role of Information Technology: An Exploratory Study on the Role of Alignment. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(4), 579-595.

Baum, Warren C., and Tolbert, Stokes, M. 1985. Investing in Development.Published for the World Bank.Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Oxford University Press.

Bogdanowicz, M. & Bailey, E. (2002). The value ofknowledge and the values of the new knowledgeworker: generation X in the new economy.Journal of European Industrial Training, (26)2/3/4: 125-129

Borgmann, A. (2006). Technology as a Cultural Force: The Canadian Journal of Sociology 31 (3): 351-360.

Boyle, G. (2009). Be the Change: Empowering Women Through Microfinance.

Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2001). The practice of nursing research: conduct, critique and utilization.Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: W.B. Saunders.

Burt, P. (2012). Linking Monitoring And Evaluation to Impact Evaluation. InterAction.

Carletto, Calogero, and Morris, Saul, S. 1999. Designing Methods for the Monitoring and Evaluation of Household Food Security and Rural Development Projects. IFPRI Technical Guide No. 10. Washington, DC.

Carrel, M. R. (2006). Defining WorkforceDiversity Programs and Practices in Organizations: A Longitudinal Study.Labour Law Journal. Spring 2006

Chen, P. & Choi, Y. (2008). Generational differences inwork values: a study of hospitality management. International Journal of ContemporaryHospitality Management, (20)6: 595-615.

Childs, J. (2005). Managing Workforce Diversity at IBM: A Global HR Topic That Has Arrived.Human Resource Management,Spring2005.44(1), 73-77 @ 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Chileshe, N., Haupt, T. & Fester, F. (2007).Assessing the readiness of building diplomates for the South African construction industry. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 2(2), 34-39

CIC (2009). Toward good practice in Public Engagement. A participatory evaluation guide for CSOs

Cohen, W. M., &Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,35, 128-152.

Columbia Communication Corporation(2013), The Business case for Government Fiber Optic in Holly Springs:Kensington

Cooper, D. R., & Schinder, P. S. (2010). Business research methods. 11th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business research methods (8thed.).United States of America: Tata McGraw-Hill.

Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. S. (2011). Business research methods (8th ed). New Delhi: Tata: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. India.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Daron, A. Simon, J. James, A. Robinson, J. (2001);The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. The American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No.5, pp. 1369-1401 Published by: American Economic Association Stable.

Diba, J. P. (2011). Influence of stakeholder management on project sustainability. A case of Compassion International/Kenya, Kilifi District. Retrieved from http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/handle/123456789/4750

Donald, R. C. & Pamela S. S. (2000) Other, Subsequent Edition, Mixed media production; Business Research Methods

Donaldson, S. I. (2001). Overcoming our negative reputation: Evaluation becomes known as a helping profession. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 355-361.

Ebel, D. & Serdar, Y. (2002). On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization.World

Egoeze, F. (2014). An Evaluation of ICT Infrastructure and Application in Nigeria Universities.

Ektewan, M. &Ogunlana, S.O. (2006). Public hearings in Thailand's infrastructure projects: effective participations?,Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13 (4), 343 – 363

Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3), 331-349.

Fudge, N. & Wolfe, C.D.A. (2008). Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study.BMJ, 336, 313

Gasper, D. (1999). Problems in the Logical Framework Approach and the challenges for project cycle Management.The Courier, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European commission.

Ghazala, M. & Vijayendra R. (2011) Evaluating Community Based and Community Driven Development: A critical review of the Evidence. Working Paper, Development research Group, World Bank

Gichuki, P.M. (2012); Factors Affecting Monitoring and Evaluation of Micro Finance Institution(MFIs) projects in Kenya; A case study of Muranga County; A research project Submitted to the school of Business In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Award of the Degree of Masters of Business Administration of Kenyatta University.

Gikonyo, W. (2008) The CDF Social Audit Guide: A Handbook for Communities. Nairobi: Open Society Initiative for East Africa

Goh, 2011: Industrial policy focus of South East Asia Nations: Technology Development or Innovation? Journal for Institutional Innovation, Development & Transition Vol. 6 No 1 P 1

Gorman, S. P., &Malecki, E. J. (2000). The networks of the Internet: an analysis of provider networks in the USA. Telecommunications Policy, 24(2), 113-134.

Government of Kenya (2001), Ministry of Finance: Government Finance Statistics (GFS): Government Printers, Nairobi

Government of Kenya (2003), Constituencies Development Fund Act 2003: Government Printers, Nairobi

Government of Kenya (2004), Constituencies Development Fund Regulations 2004: Government Printers, Nairobi

Government of Kenya (2008), Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Statistical Abstracts and Economic Surveys, 2003 to 2008: Government Printers, Nairobi

Government of Kenya (2009), CDF Allocations: Government Printers, Nairobi

Government of Kenya (2010), Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Kenya National Population and Household Census 2009: Government Printers, Nairobi

Government of United Kingdom (2011), Cabinet Office: Government ICT Strategy:Cabinet Office, 70 Whitehall, London SW1A 2AS.

Gray, J. 2009. Evaluations for learning, A discussion paper for the UK not-for-profit sector www.framework.org.uk.

Gregor, S., Martin, M., Fernandez, W., Stern, S. and Vitale, M. (2006).The transformational dimension in the realisation of business value from Information Technology.Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15, 249-270.

Grubb and Ryan, (2000). [he Role of Evaluation for Vocational Education and Training,ILO. Geneva.

Gurbaxani, V., and Kemerer, C. (1989) "An Agent-Theoretic Perspective of the Management of Information Systems."Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Hawaii Conference on Systems Science, Volume III, January, pp. 141-150.

Gwadoya, R. (2011);Factors influencing effective implementation of monitoring and evaluation practices in donor funded projects in Kenya. A case of Turkana district; A Research project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of master of Business Administration in the School of Business,Kenyatta University

Hadjimanolis, A. (2000). "A Resource-based View of Innovativeness in Small Firms." Technology Analysis and Strategic Management Journal 12(2): 263-281.

Harenstam, A., Bejerot, E., Leijon, O., Scheele, P. and Waldenstrom, K. (2004). ‘Multilevel analyses of organizational change and working conditions in public and private sector’, Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(3): 305-343.

Hirschheim R. and Smithson S. (2006) “Evaluation of Information Systems: A Critical Assessment”, In Beyond the It Productivity Paradox, (Eds, Willcocks and Lester) John Wiley&Sons, Chichester.

Hu, Q. and Plant, R. (2001).An empirical study of the causal relationship between IT investment and firm performance.Information Resources Management Journal, 17, (1), 37-62.

IDRC, KTH and WBI (2006), Optical Fibre for Education and Research Networks in Eastern and Southern Africa

Indrakumaran, A. N. (2011). The role of monitoring and evaluation in promoting good governance in South Africa: A case study of the Department of Social Development. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand.

Institute of Economic Affairs, (2006). Kenyans’ verdict. A citizens report card on the Constituencies Development Fund (CDF), Nairobi.

International Telecommunication Union - ITU (2012) Measuring the Information Society. Place des Nations CH-1211 Geneva Switzerland. ISBN 978-92-61-14071-7.

Irungu, B. K., & Wanjau, K. L. (2011). Effectiveness of vendor managed inventory systems in retail supermarkets in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Public Management, 1(1), 85-89.

Jack R. M. and Samuel J. M. (2006).Project Management: A managerial Approach. Asia.

Jean, E., Diana, P., & Avan, W. (2011). Making Connections.Using a theory of change to develop planning and evaluation. London: Charities Evaluation Services.

Jerry, A., & Anne , G. (2008). Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation in Practice.Lessons learnt from Central Asia. International NGO Training and Research Center.Praxis Paper 21.

Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., &Lacity, M. C. (2006).A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1-23.

Jody Ray, C. (2004). Ten steps to a result -Based Monitoring and Evaluation System, World Bank:, Washington DC.

Kaburu, R.W(2012); Factors Influencing performance of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Non-governmental Organizations; A case of NGos in Nairobi County; A Research Project Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award Degree of Masters of Business Administration (Project Management) of Kenyatta University.

Kairu, P. N. & Ngugi, P. K. (2014). Factors affecting effective implementation of constituency development fund projects in Machakos Town Constituency, Machakos County in Kenya. International Journal of Current Business and Social Sciences, 1 (2), 146-167.

Kerote O. A. (2007) The Role of the Local Community in the Management of Constituency Development Funds in Sabatia Constituency in Vihiga. A research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements of Post Graduate Diploma in Project Planning and Management, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

Kerzner, H. (2003). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, New York: Wiley, p.45.

Kibua, N. T. (2006); An Assessment of the management and utility of the Constituency Development Funds in Kenya; Nairobi. Institute of Policy Analysis and Research

Kimani, F., Nekesa, F., & Iung'u, N. (2009). Best Practices in constituency Development collaboration cent 'e for Gender and Development.

Kiptalam, G. K., & Rodrigues, A. J. (2011).Accessibility and utilization of ICTs among secondary school teachers in Kenya.

Kivuli, F. S. (2013). Factors influencing utilization of information and communications technology in secondary schools in Kitui central district, Kituicounty (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

Knipe, A., Van der Waldt, G., Van Niekerk, D., Burger, D. & Nell, K. 2002.Project management for success. Sandown: Heinemann.

Kombo P.O. (2006). Proposal and Writing: An Introduction. Pauline’s Publications Africa.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited Publishers.

Lin-lin, X., Yang, Y. Hu, Y. & Chan, A.P.C. (2014). Understanding project stakeholders’ perceptions of public participation in China's infrastructure and construction projects: Social effects, benefits, forms, and barriers", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21(2), 224 – 240

Louisa, G. (2010).Monitoring and evaluation.How to Guide. Bond for International Development

Mackay, K. (2006). Evaluation capacity development.Institutionalising of monitoring and evaluation systems to improve public sector management.

Mackay, K. (2007). How to build monitoring and evaluation systems to support better government. Washington D.C: World Bank.

Marchewka, J.T. 2010.Information technology project management.Edisi ke-3. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Marshall, C., Rossman, G., (1999), Designing Qualitative Research, (3rd edition): Thousand Oaks Publishers, London

Matanda, G and Wanyoike D.(2012); Influence of Strategic management Practice on successful completion of constituency Development Funded Projects in Rural Areas in Kenya; A case of Trans-nzoia County; International Journal of Science and Research

Maylor, H. (2003), Project Management 3rd Edition: Pearson Education Limited, London

Meredith, J. R. (2006) Project Management. A Managerial Approach, John Wiley & Sons, IncNewyork.

Minnaar, F. 2010. Strategic and Performance Management in the Public Sector. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers

MoICT, (2014), The Kenya National ICT Masterplan, towards a Smarter Kenya. 2013/14-2017/18

Morioka, T. (2009). New generation optical infrastructure technologies:‘EXAT initiative’ towards 2020 and beyond. OECC 2009, FT4, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Mugenda, O.M and Mugenda, A.G.(2008), Research Methods. Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: ACTS Press

Mulwa F. W. (2007). Participatory monitoring and evaluation of community projects.Community Based Project Monitoring, Qualitative Impact Assessment and People Friendly Evaluation Methods.Eldoret, Kenya: Zapf Chancery and P. Olivex Publishers

Mulwa, M.M., Sakwa, M., Namusonge, S.G., (2013):,Effects of Network Infrastructure on Universal Access: A Survey of ICT Access in Kenya. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 3(8),76-84.

Mulwa, W (2008). Particijatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Community Projects,Community base: .project monitoring, quality assessment and people friendly Evaluationmetho Is. Pauline's publications, Nairobi

Musomba&Kimele(2013). Factors affecting effectiveness of constituency development fund projects in Chanagmew constituency in Kilifi district, Kenya Zapf Chancery and P. Olivex Publishers

Mwalulu, J. and D, Irungu (2007) CDF The Constituency Fund for Development or Campaigns? Nairobi: The Youth Agenda.

Mwangi, K. (2005). Efficiency and efficacy of Kenya’s Constituency Development Fund: Theory

Mwangi, O. G. 2008. „Political corruption, party financing and democracy‟ ,Journal of Modern African Studies, 46, 2: 267-285.

Nasimiyu, S.K (2009). Societal policy Development and governance in Kenya; Nairobi Development

Natasha, A. (2003). The Questfor Financial Sustainability: Foundations in Southeast Asia. Introduction to Financing Development in Southeast Asia: Opportunities for Collaboration and Sustainability.

National Monitoring and Evaluation System (NIMES, 2010), Government projects Monitoring and Evaluation Report: Government Printers, Nairobi

National Tax Payers Association (2010), Utilization of Government Revenue: Government Printers, Nairobi

Neuman, W.L. 2006. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearsons Education Inc. Boston. USA

Ngalu, M &Bomett, E(2014); The Role of Constituency Development Fund in Provision of secondary school Education in Kenya; International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research Volume 3 issue 8, August 2014

Nyaguthi& Oyugi (2014); Influence of community participation on successful implementation of constituency development fund Projects in Kenya: case study of Mwea constituency International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 1 No. 8 August 2013

Nyandika Fred(2014);Influence of stakeholders' participation on performance of road projects at Kenya National Highways Authority; A Research Project Submitted in Partial fulfillment for the award of degree of master of science in project management of Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Ochieng et al(2012); Effectiveness of Monitoring and Evaluation of CDF Projects In Kenya; A case of Ainamoi Constituency ; Moi University, School of Human Resource Department, Eldoret Kenya.

Odhiambo, PSO(2007); Impact of Kenya Education Staff Institute Training on Secondary School Management in Kenya( Case study Siaya District); A research proposal for the degree of doctor of philosophy in Evaluation of Education Programmes; Department of Education Commu. Tech and Curriculum Studies.Maseno University.

OECD. 2002. Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management. Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Paris

Oke. M., 2011 Telecommunicatio policy in transition: Mainstreaming kena in global information technology , Nairobi : Institute of Academic Affairs

Open Society Initiative of East Africa (OSIEA, 2008): Social Audit report on CDF: OSIEA,Niarobi

Orodho,A.J. (2003). Essentials of Educational and Social Science Research methods:Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.

Otieno, Fredrick Omondi(2013); , "Deepening Democracy at the Grassroots Level: Citizen Participation in State Devolved Funds (CDF) In Kenya" (2013). Pan African Studies – Thesis Paper 1.

Owuor, T.R. & Ochieng, F. (2013). Factors influencing management of CDF projects: A case of Ainamoi Constituency, Kericho County. International Journal of Science and Technology, 2(1), 1 – 15.

Oyugi, N.L(2006); Equity in Resource Allocation; The need for Alternative constituency

Patton. M. (1997).Utilizat 'on-focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, Sage publications.Ca.Result oriented monitoring and evaluation-chapter 4-6, available at http://www.tmdp.org/Evaluation/docurr ents/mec4-6.htm

Piccoli, G. and Ives, B. (2005). IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly, 29, (4), 747-776.

Powell, P.L. (2010). Evaluation of Information Technology investments: business as usual?.InBeyond the IT productivity paradox, (ed. L.P. Willcocks and S. Lester), pp. 151-182.Wiley, Chichester.

Pradhan(2002): Information Technology in Nepal: What role of for the government? The electronic journal on Information Systems in developing countries Vol. 001 8- March; 2000 1-11

Prinsloo, J. and Roos, M. 2005. Performance Auditing – A Step-by-step Approach. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers

Project Management Institute (PMI). 2008. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Edisi ke-4. Newton Squera, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.

Remenyi, D. (2000). The elusive nature of delivering benefits from IT investment.ElectronicJournal of Information Systems Evaluation, 3, (1).

Remenyi, D., Bannister, F. and Money, A. (2007).The effective measurement and management of ICT costs and benefits, (3rd edn). Elsevier CIMA Publishing, Oxford.

Ross , A.( 2008), Capital Management practices, 3rd Edition, Waveland Printer, Illinois.

Rossi M.H., Freeman H. E., and Lipsey, M.W. (1999).Evaluation -A Systematic Approach.6th Edition. Sage Publications, California United Nations Capital Development fund [UNCDF]. (2009). Enabling Poor Rural People to Overcome Poverty in Ghana. United Nations, New York

Saunders, et al (2009).Research Methods for Business Students, 5th edition.Edinburgh;Harlow; Pearson Education Limited.

Sergon, J.,(2011), Kenya e-Government Journal, institutional framework, role, achievement and challenges.

Tam, H. Y., Lee, T., Ho, S. L., Haber, T., Graver, T., Méndez, A., ...& Tin, S. (2007). Utilization of fiber optic Bragg Grating sensing systems for health monitoring in railway applications. Structural Health Monitoring, 2, 1824-1831.

UNDP. (2009). Handbook On Planning,Monitoring And Evaluating For Development Results. United States of America: A.K.Office Supplies (NY).

UNICEF. ( May 2003). Programme Policy and Procedures Manual: Programme Operations. New York: UNICEF.

Valadez, J. and Bamberger, M. 2000. Monitoring and Evaluating Social Programs in Developing Countries – A Handbook for Policymakers, Managers and Researchers. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Van der Waldt, G. 2009. Managing Performance in the Public Sector – Concepts, Considerations and Challenges. Lansdowne: Juta.

Waemi&Mitulla(2007): Finance management in Local Authorities Projects in Kenya: A case study of Mavoko and Nyeri Municipal Councils: A project of LOG IN AFRICA Initiative

Wanjiru, G. (2008), The CDF Social Audit Guide: A Guide Handbook for Communities.Nairobi: Open Society Initiative of E. Africa.

Woller, Gary. “Building Successful Microfinance Institutions by Assessing Clients’ Needs.” The SEEP Network (2005)

Woolcock, M. (2011). “Guest Post on The Importance of Time and Trajectories in Understanding Project Effectiveness".

World Bank (2006), Guidelines procurement under IBRD loans and IDA credits: World Bank, Washington D. C

Wysocki, R.K. 2007.Effective project management: traditional, adaptive, extreme. Indianapolis, IN.: Wiley.

Yin, R. K., (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, (3rd edition). Sage Publications, London

Yumi, S., & Susan, B. (2007). Monitoring & Evaluation:Tips for Strengthening Organisational Capacity. World Bank Small Grants Program.

Zeller, Manfred and Richard L. Meyer, (2002), The Triangle of Microfinance: Financial Sustainability, Outreach and Impact. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press

Zulu and Chileshe (2008).Poor performance of Zambian Contractors.Institution of Structural Engineers magazine, UK, July Publication.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v3i2.253

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.