INFLUENCE OF CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON LOAN RECOVERY PERFORMANCE OF THE REGISTERED DIGITAL CREDIT PROVIDERS IN KENYA

ERIC MWAI MAINA, AGNES NJERU, PhD

Abstract


This research assessed how methods for managing credit risk affect the capacity of digital credit providers in Kenya to recoup loans. The study used a descriptive survey methodology, and its target population included all 32 of Kenya's registered digital lending enterprises, including both company managers and their credit managers. The study prioritized gathering primary data and used random sampling procedures. Multiple regression was used to measure the inferential data using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Credit Procedures had aggregate mean response of 4.240 and standard deviation of 1.040. Credit Appraisal had an overall mean response of 4.057, and an aggregate standard deviation of 1.162. Credit Monitoring had an aggregate mean of the responses of 4.089 and an overall standard deviation of 1.001. Credit Recovery Systems had an average response of 4.150 and an overall standard deviation of 1.162. Loan Recovery Performance had an aggregate mean of 4.067 with a total standard deviation of 1.116. The results presented a strong and significant correlation (r=0.438, p=0.000) between credit procedures, a strong and positive correlation (r=0.351, p=0.000) between credit monitoring methods, a strong and substantial correlation (r=0.229, p=0.000) between credit evaluation, a positively and significantly correlation between credit recovery systems (r=0.205, p=0.000) and loan recovery performance. This implied that a profit gain follows an increase in any of these variables. The findings indicate a positive correlation among all the parameters, with credit procedures being the strongest (r=0.700) influencer of loan recovery performance. The R-squared value was .774. All the independent variables, affect loan recovery performance by predicting it, according to the ANOVA table results (F= 4.691, p<0.0005). With all other factors held constant at zero, a unit increase of the independent variable; credit procedures, credit appraisal, credit monitoring or credit recovery systems, influence on loan recovery performance by 0.334, 0.372, 0.319 or 0.368 respectively. The study recommends that other scholars tackle, in the future, the other aspects of risk management, such as marketing risk, liquidity risk, etc, within digital lending firms.

Keywords:  Digital credit providers, Credit management, Credit appraisal, Credit monitoring

CITATION: Maina, E. M., & Njeru, A. (2023). Influence of credit risk management practices on loan recovery performance of the registered digital credit providers in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10 (4), 682 – 695. http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i4.2772.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agboola, A. A. (2001). Impact of Electronic Banking on Customer Services in Lagos, Nigeria. Ife Journal of Economics and Finance. Department of Economics, O.A.U, IleIfe, Nigeria, vol. 5, Nos. 1&2

Avery, R. B., Raphael, W. B., Paul, S. C, & Glenn, B. C. (2000).“Credit Scoring: Statistical Issues and Evidence from Credit-Bureau Files.‖ Real Estate Economics.

Bettis.J.E. (2009). The Monetary and Financial System. London, Bonkers Books Ltd, 3rd Edition.

Central Bank of Kenya (Digital Credit Providers) Regulations, 2021 part ... Available at: https://www.centralbank.go.ke/uploads/banking_circulars/673866074_DRAFT%20DIGITAL%20CREDIT%20PROVIDERS%20REGULATIONS%202021%20-%20December%202021.pdf (Accessed: 08 September 2023).

Cook, T., & McKay, C. (2015). How M-Shwari Works: The Story So Far. Nairobi: FSD Kenya.

David, M. (2018). Effect of Mobile-Based Lending Process on Non-Performing Loans in Commercial Banks in Nakuru Town. Nairobi: JKUAT.

Gieseche, K. (2004). Credit Risk Modelling and Valuation: An Introduction. Credit Risk: Models and Management, Vol.2, Cornell University, London

Geoffrey N. M. (2010). The impact of Mobile Banking: A Case Study of M-Pesa in the Kenyan Society. Submitted to the University of Nairobi.

Ingham P.Y. (2004). Managing Financial Institutions. An Asset Liability Approach, New York. The Dryden Press A division of Harcourt College Publisher. 4th Edition

Jappelli, T., & Pagano, M. (2010). Information Sharing, Lending, and Defaults: Cross-Country Evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26(10), 2017-2045.

Kisengese, W. K. (2014). The Impact of Credit Information Sharing on the Level of Non - Non-Performing Loans of Commercial Banks in Kenya. Unpublished MBA Thesis. United States International University-Africa.

Kisala, P. (2014). The Effect of Credit Risk Management Practices on Loan Performance. Nairobi: University of Nairobi.

Khin, S. (2016). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 39(6), 56-97

Kirui, R., & Onyuma, S. (2015). Role of Mobile Money Transactions on Revenue of Microbusiness in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management, 36(7), 63-67.

Li, F. & Zou Y. (2014). The impact of credit risk management on profitability of commercial banks. A study of Europe, Umea School of Business and Economics.

Marsh, I.W. (2008). The Effect of Lenders’ Credit Risk Transfer Activities on Borrowing Firms’ Equity Returns, Cass Business School, London and Sacco of Finland.

McGregor, R. (2013). Mobile Banking: Increasing Access to Financial Services

Migwi, J. (2013). Credit Monitoring and Recovery Strategies Adopted by Commercial Banks. Nairobi: University of Nairobi

Mohamed, H. S. (2017). Factors Affecting Debt Recovery in Commercial Banks In Kenya a Case Study at Equity Bank Kenya Limited. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 3(10), 54-64

Moti H. O, Masinde J. M, Sindani M. N & Mugenda N. G (2012), Effectiveness of Credit Management System on Loan Performance: Empirical Evidence from Micro Finance Sector in Kenya. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology.

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.

Murunga D. L (2017), Effect of mobile-based lending process on non-performing loans in commercial banks in Nakuru Town, Kenya, Unpublished MBA Project, Jomo Kenyatta university of agriculture and technology.

Njenga, B. (2014). The Effects of Credit Management Practices on Loan Performance in Deposit Taking Microfinance Institutions in Kenya. Nairobi: UON

Nzayisenga N. A (2017). Effect of mobile lending on the financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. Master of Science in Finance project, University of Nairobi.

Paul G. & Edoardo T. (2018). Digital credit in Kenya: Evidence from demand-side surveys. FSD Kenya.

Totolo, E. (2018). The digital credit revolution in Kenya: an assessment of market demand, 5 years on. Nairobi: FSD Kenya.

Tomz, M., & Wright, M. (2013). Empirical Research on Sovereign Debt and Default. Annual Review of Economics, 5(1), 247-252.

Wainaina J. N (2017), Mobile based loan management practices and financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya, Submitted MBA project, Kenyatta University

Wandera, A. (2017). Factors Influencing the Performance of Loan Collection by Commercial Banks through Outsourcing of Non-performing Loans to Private Firms: A Case of Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited. Nairobi: UON

Zeituna M, Wachira M, Bersudskaya V, Nanjero W & Graham A.N. (2017). Where Credit Is Due, Customer Experience of Digital Credit in Kenya. Report published by MicroSave




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i4.2772

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.