EFFECT OF PROCUREMENT PLANNING ON SERVICE DELIVERY IN LAMU COUNTY, KENYA

STEPHEN ODHIAMBO NYAMILA, PETER WAMALWA BARASA, PhD

Abstract


Determining the impact of procurement planning on the provision of services in Lamu County, Kenya, was the primary goal of this study. The objectives of this research were to ascertain the impact of user needs identification; evaluate the impact of procurement methodology; investigate the impact of budget allocation; and, lastly, ascertain the impact of vendor selection on service delivery in Lamu County, Kenya. The study used a descriptive design. To choose a sample that is representative of the whole population, the researcher applied stratified random sampling approach. The 504 employees, who are middle- and senior-level personnel chosen from Lamu County's 11 State Corporations, were the target population. By applying the Yamane formula, the sample size of 223 respondents was established. Since all of the departments' operations, engineering, legal, finance, human resources, and procurement departments are centralized and able to supply data, questionnaires were utilized to gather primary data from each of them. Using SPSS version 24, a descriptive analysis of the data was conducted to determine the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to ascertain the link between the independent and dependent variables, and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to quantify the strength of that relationship. The findings indicate that all four procurement planning variables—budget allocation, procurement methodology, user needs identification, and vendor selection—significantly contribute to predicting service delivery performance in Lamu County. The coefficients reveal positive and statistically significant relationships between each procurement factor and service delivery outcomes. Specifically, for every one-unit increase in budget allocation, effective procurement methodology, user needs identification, and vendor selection, service delivery is predicted to increase by 0.350, 0.250, 0.280, and 0.300 units, respectively. In conclusion, the findings underscore the importance of adhering to budgetary allocations and effective fund utilization for enhancing service delivery outcomes in Lamu County, Kenya. The study recommends parastatals to develop clear guidelines and frameworks for budget allocation that prioritize alignment with community needs and service delivery objectives; implement structured and transparent procurement procedures to ensure fairness, competition, and efficiency in vendor selection and to provide training and capacity-building programs for procurement officers.

Keywords: Procurement Planning, Service Delivery, Budget Allocation, User Needs Identification

CITATION: Nyamila, S. O.,&Barasa, P. W. (2024). Effect of procurement planning on service delivery in Lamu County, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 11 (2), 1477 – 1499. http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i2.2996


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agaba, E., & Shipman, N. (2007). Public procurement reform in developing countries: The Kenyan experience. Boca Raton, FL: Academics Press.

Apiyo, R. O., & Mburu, D. K. (2014). Factors affecting procurement planning in county governments in Kenya: Case study of Nairobi City County. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1-34.

Arrowsmith, S., & Hartley, M. A. (2016). The impact of procurement methods on performance of firms in New York. In Factors and determinants of e-democracy (pp. 286-296). IGI Global.

Bain, J. S. (1968). Industrial organization. New York: John Wiley.

Benjamin. (2017). How does decentralization affect health sector planning and financial management? A case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County, Kenya. International Journal for Equity in Health.

D’Oria, L., Crook, T. R., Ketchen, D. J., Sirmon, D. G., & Wright, M. (2021). The Evolution of Resource-Based Inquiry: A Review and Meta-Analytic Integration of the Strategic Resources–Actions–Performance Pathway. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1383-1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321994182

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (1997). Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain. European Management Journal, 15(3), 286-296.

Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gatobu, F. H. (2020). Influence of Procurement Process on the Performance of Public Entities (A Case Study of Nairobi County Government). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(4), 40–61.

Holdford D. A. (2018). Resource-based theory of competitive advantage - a framework for pharmacy practice innovation research. Pharmacy practice, 16(3), 1351.

https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.03.1351.

Kakai P. & Mukono A., I. (2022). Effect of Budget Allocation and Procurement Processes on Budget Utilization in the Public Sector in Kenya: A Case of The Judiciary. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(6), 109 – 122.

Kothari, C. R. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (3rd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited.

Kothari, C. R. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (3rd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited.

Kovacs, A. (2004). Enhancing procurement practices: Comprehensive approach to acquiring complex facilities and projects. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61, 109-117.

Lawino, K., & Arinaitwe, J. (2023). The Role of Procurement Planning on Service Delivery in Local Government: A Case Study Gulu City Council, Gulu City. Thesis, Gulu University.

Mello, T. M. D., Eckhardt, D., & Leiras, A. (2017). Sustainable procurement portfolio management: A case study in a mining company. Production.

Mensah, C., & Tuo, G. (2013). Evaluation of Procurement Processes and its Operational Performance in the Public Sector of Ghana: A Case Study of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital and Kumasi Polytechnic. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(29), 121.

Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2003). Applied statistics and probability for engineers (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mrope, N. P. (2017). The effect of professionalism on performance of procurement function in the public sector: Experience from the Tanzanian public entities. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 5(6), 48–59.

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi, KE: Acts Press.

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2008). Social sciences research: Theory and principles. Nairobi, KE: Acts Press.

Odhiambo, V. A. (2015). Supplier Selection Practices and Procurement Performance in Nairobi City County. International Academic Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 2(2), 74-90.

Ombuki, K., Arasa, R., Ngugi, P., & Muhwezi, M. (2014). Determinants of procurement regulatory compliance by Kenya’s public universities. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1(9), 542-559.

Otieno, J., & (Ph.D), D. (2018). Influence of Vendor Rating on Service Delivery in State Corporations in Kenya: A Case of National Construction Authority. Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 5.

Otieno, J.P. (2016). Factors affecting procurement planning in public secondary schools in Kenya: A case study of secondary schools in Migori County. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research.

Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationship between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 19-37.

Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. (2003). Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(4), 309-323.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

Raji, I., Bugaje, I. B., Usman, S., Aliyu, M., Aliyu, A., & Ardo, A. (2022). The International Journal of Business and Management Research. The International Journal of Business and Management Research, 13(1), 69.

Rono, Evelyn Chepkoech. (November, 2013). Procurement planning and service delivery in state corporation in Kenya. Thesis, University of Nairobi.

Sagimo, G. (2012). Special research focus on supply chain linkages: Challenges for design and management in the 21st century. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 537-552.

Scott, G. K., & Enu-Kwesi, F. (2018). Role of budgeting practices in service delivery in the public sector: A study of district assemblies in Ghana. Human Resource Management Research, 8(2), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.hrmr.20180802.01

Shil, N. (2009). A Case on Vendor Selection Methodology: An Integrated Approach. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 3. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v3i1.56.

Simatupan, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2015). The effect of procurement methods on performance of companies in India. The collaborative supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), 15-30.

Simchi Nath Banerjee, R., & Kaminsky, A. (2013). Procurement methods and organizational performance in Ethiopian public organizations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(2), 184-204.

Taherdoost, H., & Brard, A. (2019). Analyzing the Process of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1024-1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.317

Wong, C. Y., & Karia, N. (2010). Explaining the competitive advantage of logistics providers: A resource-based view approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 128, 51-67.

Zahari, H. (2019). Identification of Need in Capital Asset Procurement. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2, 43-47.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i2.2996

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.