INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL GOVERNMENTAL CORPORATIONS IN KENYA

NICHOLAS RIDLEY NYESI OTIENO, DENNIS JUMA, PhD

Abstract


Satisfactory performance of the Governmental corporations is crucial to the social economic development of any country. However, their performance has been observed to be unsuitable in a number of ways. The main purpose of this study was to determine the effect of innovation on the performance of commercial Governmental corporations in Kenya. The study was guided by five theories, namely; Resource based view theory, creative theory of entrepreneurship, Institutional. theory, Schumpeter’s innovation theory and theory of corporate entrepreneurship. To obtain a full description of a single phenomenon within its context survey was used as a tool for data collection. The study used causal research design. According to the presidential task group report on state corporations, the studied population in Kenya comprised of 55 commercial Governmental firms. For the purpose of this study, a census of the entire 55 commercial governmental corporation in Kenya was used. The questionnaires were used as an instrument of data collection. The data collected              after sorting was coded, and statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version 22) analyzed it. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics and results presented in form of tables and graphs. A simple linear regression was carried out in order to ascertain independent factors effects on the dependent variable. The study found that, the level of innovativeness significantly   influence performance. The study concluded that innovation practices affect the performance of commercial Governmental organizations. The results provided a basis upon which management of Governmental corporations would enhance their performance through proper management on innovation. The study recommended that management of commercial governmental corporations should embrace and understand dimension of innovation practices.

Key words: Innovations, Entrepreneur Practices, Performance

CITATION: Otieno, N. R. N.,& Juma, D. (2024). Innovation and performance of commercial governmental corporations in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 11 (4), 344 – 358. http://dx.doi.Org/10.61426/Sjbcm.v11i4.3086


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahn, D., Kim, H., & Na, K. J. (2015). Surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of head and neck mass lesions: sampling adequacy and diagnostic accuracy. Annals of surgical oncology, 22(4), 1360-1365. DOI: 10.1245/ s10434-014- 4119-2.

Andersson, M., Waldenström, D. de Soto, H. (2017) Recipient of the 2017 Global Award for Entrepreneurship Research. Small Business Economics 49, 721–728 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9948-5.

Andrews-Speed, P. (2016). Applying institutional theory to the low-carbon energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 216-225. https://doi.org/10.101 6/j.erss.2015.12.011.

Appiah-Kubi, K. & Rjoub, H (2017). State-owned enterprises and privatisation in Ghana. http://cmss.univnt.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_V_issue_2/ CMSS_vol_V_issue_2_art.002.pdf.

Arend, R. J., Sarooghi, H., & Burkemper, A. (2015). Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Academy of management Review, 40(4), 630-651. http://www. jstor.org/stable/43699312.

Barasa, L., Knoben, J., Vermeulen, P., Kimuyu, P., & Kinyanjui, B. (2017). Institutions, Resources and Innovation in East Africa: A Firm Level Approach. Research Policy, 46,280-291..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.008.

Barney, J. B. (2014). How marketing scholars might help address issues in resource-based theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(1), 24-26. DOI:10.1007/ s11747-013-0336-7.

Baruah, B., & Ward, A. (2015). Metamorphosis of intrapreneurship as an effective organizational strategy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 811-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0318-3.

Berthiaume, G. H., & Yeakley, D. D. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,635,309. Washington, DC:

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. https://www.uspto.gov/web/ offices/com/sol/og/2014/week46/TOC.htm.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cardinale, I. (2018). Beyond constraining and enabling: Toward new micro-foundations for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 132-155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0020.

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design. Sage publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Dahabreh, I. J., & Steingrimsson, J. A. (2020). Toward Causally Interpretable Meta-analysis: Transporting Inferences from Multiple Randomized Trials to a New Target Population. Epidemiology, 31(3), 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8426.

Drori, G. S. (2020). Hasn’t Institutional Theory Always Been Critical?! Organization Theory, 1(1).1-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719887982.

Drucker, P. (2007) The Practice of Management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Cambridge.

Felício, J. A., Rodrigues, R., & Caldeirinha, V. R. (2012). The effect of intrapreneurship on corporate performance. Management Decision, 50(10), 1717-1738

Finch, V. & Milman, D. (2017). Corporate insolvency law: perspectives and principles.

Cambridge University Press.

Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014). The structuration of socio-technical regimes— Conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 43(4), 772-791.

Gawke, J. C., Gorgievski, M. J., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). Employee intrapreneurship and work engagement: A latent change score approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.002.

Hayton, J. C., Hornsby, J. S., & Bloodgood, J. (2013). Part 2: The contribution of HRM to corporate entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for future research. Management, 16(4), 381–409. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.164.0381.

Hisrich, R.D Peters, K & Shepherd, K. (2017) Entrepreneurship (10ed) 9780078112843.pdf

Hitt, M. A., Xu, K., & Carnes, C. M. (2016). Resource based theory in operations management research. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 77-94.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.002.

Holdford, D. A. (2018). Resource-based theory of competitive advantage-a framework for pharmacy practice innovation research. Pharmacy Practice (Granada), 16(3). doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.03.1351.

Hsu, M. L., & Chen, F. H. (2017). The cross‐level mediating effect of psychological capital on the organizational innovation climate–employee innovative behavior relationship. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(2), 128-139.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.90.

Ibrar, M., & Khan, O. (2015). The impact of reward on employee performance. a case study of Malakand Private School. International letters of social and humanistic sciences, 52, 95-103.

Javalgi, R. G., Hall, K. D., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2014). Corporate entrepreneurship, customer- oriented selling, absorptive capacity, and international sales performance in the international B2B setting: Conceptual framework and research propositions. International Business Review, 23(6), 1193-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.04.003.

Kensby, J., Trüschel, A., & Dalenbäck, J. O. (2015). Potential of residential buildings as thermal energy storage in district heating systems–Results from a pilot test. Applied Energy, 137, 773-781. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.026.

Kombo, D. K., & Tromp, D. L. A. (2009). Proposal and Thesis Writing: An Introduction.

Pauline’s Publications Africa.

Kothari, C.R. (2019) Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. (4th ed), New Age International Publishers.

Kreiser, P. M., Kuratko, D. F., Covin, J. G., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2019). Corporate entrepreneurship strategy: extending our knowledge boundaries through configuration theory. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 739-758. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00198-x.

Labunska, S., Petrova, M., & Prokopishyna, O. (2017). Asset and cost management for innovation activity. Economic annals-XXI, (165), 13-18.

doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V165-03.

Lok, J. (2019). Why (and How) Institutional Theory Can Be Critical: Addressing the Challenge to Institutional Theory’s Critical Turn. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617732832.

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 3, 1-4.

Lwamba, N. M., & Bwisa, P. H. (2014). Exploring the Effect of Corporate Entrepreneurship on Financial Performance of Firms: Evidence from Kenya’s Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(1), 352-370.

Maryunani, S. R., & Mirzanti, I. R. (2015). The development of entrepreneurship in creative industries with reference to Bandung as a creative city. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 387-394. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper.

McKeever, E., Jack, S., & Anderson, A. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.002.

Meeker, W. Q., & Escobar, L. A. (2014). Statistical methods for reliability data. John Wiley & Sons.

Mugenda O.M & Mugenda A.G (2003). Research Methods. Quantitative and qualitative Approaches. Acts press.

Mugo, P., & Macharia, J. (2021). Innovation Strategies’ Influence on Competitive Advantage in Telecommunication Companies in Kenya. The University Journal, 3(1), 81-96. https://daea.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/.

Odoardi, C. (2015). The relationship between proactive goal generation and innovative behaviour at work. Journal of Management Development, 34(5), 553– 565. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-04-2014-0037.

Omwenga, E. (2017) Influence of organizational restructuring activities on employee commitment in state corporations in Kenya. [Doctoral Dissertation, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology]. https://ikesra.kra.go.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/817.

Panjaitan, H., Cempena, I. B., Trihastuti, A., & Panjaitan, F. A. B. K. (2021). The Effect of Competitive Aggressiveness on Business Performance: A Case Study of Private Universities in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO4.0875.

Pittenger, M. A., & Wolfe, D. J. (2019). Corporate and Commercial Practice in the Delaware Court of Chancery. LexisNexis.

Popkova, E. G. (2018). Economic and legal foundations of modern Russian society: A new institutional theory. IAP.

Punch, K. (2003) Survey Research: The Basics. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209984.

Rhodes, J. D., & Kumar, H. (2014). Experimental and data collection methods for a large- scale smart grid deployment: Methods and first results. Energy, 65, 462-471. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.004.

Shepherd, D.A., Patzelt, H. (2017). Researching Entrepreneurial Decision Making. In: Trailblazing in Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48701-48.

Tülüce, N. S., & Yurtkur, A. K. (2015). Term of strategic entrepreneurship and Schumpeter's creative destruction theory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 720- 728. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.146

Werlang, N. B., & Rossetto, C. R. (2019). The effects of organizational learning and innovativeness on organizational performance in the service provision sector. Gestão & Produção, 26(3), e3641. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X3641-19

Willmott, H. (2019). Can it? On expanding institutional theory by disarming critique. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28, 350

Zhao, Y. & Fan, B. (2018). Exploring open government data capacity of government agency: Based on the resource-based theory. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.002.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i4.3086

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.