EFFECT OF MARKET FACTORS-BASED BEHAVIOUR BIASES ON THE PERFORMANCE OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

ALLAN MUCHEMI KURIA, PhD

Abstract


This study aimed to examine the effect of market factor-based behavioral biases on the performance of real estate investments in Kenya. Specifically, the research focused on understanding how behavioral biases such as reliance on past information, short-term return preferences, and use of earnings for long-term savings or short-term projects impact real estate investment decisions. Additionally, the study tested the relevance of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) within the Kenyan real estate market. The study adopted a positivist research paradigm and a descriptive research design, targeting 123,471 real estate investors represented by 284 registered real estate agents in Nairobi, Kenya. A multi-stage sampling process resulted in a sample size of 384 respondents, with 353 completed questionnaires representing an 83% response rate. Data was collected using Likert-type questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including bivariate regression analysis to determine the relationship between market factor-driven biases and real estate investment performance. The results revealed a significant relationship between market factors-based behavioral biases and the performance of real estate investments in Kenya, with market biases explaining 27.8% of the variation in investment performance (R²=0.278, p<0.05). Key factors influencing market biases included reliance on past information, short-term return preferences, and the use of earnings for both long-term savings and short-term projects. The findings support the existence of market anomalies and inefficiencies, indicating that real estate investors in Kenya often make irrational decisions influenced by behavioral biases rather than purely rational analysis. This study contributes to behavioral finance by highlighting the significant role of market factor-driven biases in shaping investment decisions, challenging the assumptions of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) in the context of real estate investments. It emphasizes the need to incorporate behavioral considerations into traditional finance theories.

Keywords: Market Factors-Based Behavioral Biases, Real Estate Investment

CITATION: Kuria, A. M. (2024) Effect of market factors-based behaviour biases on the performance of real estate investments. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 11 (4), 1266 – 1278.  http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i4.3155


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bodie, Z., Kane, A. & Marcus, A. (2007). Essentials of investments (6th edition). McGraw-Hill / Irwin

Chao, H., Wright, R. & Zhu, Y. (2012). Housing and Liquidity. Meeting Papers from Society for Economic Dynamics No 94.

Clayton, J. & MacKinnon, P. (2000). Measuring and Explaining Changes in REIT Liquidity: Moving Beyond the Bid-Ask Spread. Real Estate Economics: 28, 89-115.

Cowles, III., A. (1933). Can Stock Market Forecasters Forecast? Econometrica, 1(3): 309-324.

Fama, E. & French K. R. (1988). Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 22(1): 3-25.

Fama, E. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance, 25(2): 383-417.

Fama, E. F. (1965a). Random Walks In Stock Market Prices. Financial Analysts Journal 21(5): 55–59.

Fisher, A., Laing, J. E. & Stoeckel, J. E. (1983). Handbook for family planning operations research design (6th edition). New York: Population Council.

Jing, W. & Siqi, Z. (2008). Determinants of Housing Liquidity in Chinese Cities: Does Market Maturity Matter? Tsinghua Science and Technology 13(5): 689-695.

Jones, C. P. (1993). Investments. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Jud, G.D., Winkler, D.T. & Kissling, G.E. (1995). Price Spreads and Residential Housing Market Liquidity. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 11(3), 251±260.

Kalra, R., & Chan, K. C., (1994). Censored Sample Bias, Macroeconomic Factors, and Tune on Market of Residential Housing, Journal of Real Estate Research 9 (3/5): 253-262.

Kendall, M. G. & Bradford Hill, A. (1953). The Analysis of Economic Time-Series-Part I: Prices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 116 (1): 11–34.

Keogh, G. & D’Arcy, E. (1994). Market Maturity and Property Market Behaviour: A European Comparison of Mature and Emergent Markets, Journal of Property Research, 11: 215-35.

Keynes, J. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New Delhi; Atlantic Publishers & Distributors.

Kluger, B.D. & N.G. Miller, (1990). Measuring real estate liquidity. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 18:2: 145-159.

Konstantinidis, A., Katarachia , A., Borovas, G. & Voutsa, M. (2012). From efficient market hypothesis to behavioural finance: can behavioural finance be the new dominant model for investing? Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, 11(2): 16-26.

Koshy, V. (2010). Action Research for Improving Educational Practice. A Step-by-step guide. London: Sage Publications.

Kwok, H. H, & Tse C., (2006). Estimating the Liquidity Premium in the Housing Market. Mimeo

Leroy, S. F. & Porter R. D. (1981). The Present Value Relation: Tests Based on Implied Variance Bounds. Econometrica, 49(3): 555-574.

Lin, Z. & Vandell, K., (2007). Illiquidity and pricing biases in the real estate market. Real Estate Economics 35: 291-330.

Malhotra, N. K. (2004) Marketing research: an applied orientation, 4th edition, Prentice-Hall International, London.

McMillian, H. & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education, Evidence Based Inquiry (7th Edition). New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Nelson, C. R. (1972). The Term Structure of Interest Rates. New York: Basic Books.

Roberts, H.V. (1959). Stock-Market Patterns and Financial Analysis: Methodological Suggestions. Journal of Finance, 14(1): 1-11.

Rozeff, M. S. (1984). Dividend Yields Are Equity Risk Premiums. Journal of Portfolio Management, 68-75.

Shiller, R. (1981). Do Stock Prices Move Too Much To Be Justified By Subsequent in Dividends? The American Economic Review, 71(3): 421-436.

Shleifer, A. (2000). Inefficient Markets: A Introduction to Behavioural Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shleifer, A. (2000). Inefficient Markets: A Introduction to Behavioural Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. Journal of Business, forthcoming

Yacin, K. (2010). Market Rationality: Efficient Market Hypothesis versus Market Anomalies. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies 3(2): 23-38.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i4.3155

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.