INFLUENCE OF GOVERNANCE ON EFFECTIVE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF CONSTITUENCY FUNDS IN KENYA: A CASE OF LAISAMIS CONSTITUENCY

STEVE WAAMBA SAHADO, DR. MOUNI GEKARA

Abstract


The CDF was introduced in Kenya for decentralization of decision making at the grass root level generally intending to take the bottom up approach rather than the top down approach used before in development initiatives. The fund has faced numerous challenges among them management and governance issues especially in accountability and transparency. The study’s purpose was to establish the role of governance on the management of devolved funds and in specific on the Constituency Development Fund (CDF). The study was undertaken in Laisamis Constituency where the researcher used a descriptive research design approach to determine the role of governance in management of devolved funds. The study used a randomly selected sample drawn from the constituency using the rule of thumb. The sample was calculated from the urban population in Laisamis, Korr, Loglogo and Kargi towns in Marsabit County. The data was collected through a questionnaire which was self-administered. Data was analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The study revealed that the type of accountability and transparency and audit committee significantly affected effective financial management of constituency funds. The study recommends for enhanced accountability and transparency to increase management of funds. It also recommends that there is need to ensure that the audit committee on financing and deliver effective financial management of constituency funds.

Key Words: Accountability, Transparency, Audit Committee, Financial Management

 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adsera, Alicia, Carles Boix, and Mark Paine. 2003. “Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government,”

Anonymous. 2003. “Surveys Find Corporations Increasing Transparency, Boards Becoming More Assertive.” CPA Journal 73 (2): February, 14

Barro, Robert J. 1973. “The control of politicians: An economic model,” Public Choice

Beck, Thorsten, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh, 2001. “New tools in comparative political economy:

Besley, Timothy, and Andrea Prat. “Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability,” American Economic Review 96(3), 720-736.

Braiotta, Jr., L. 2002. “Corporate Audit Committees: An Approach to Continuous Improvement.” CPA Journal 72 (7): July, 48-51

Carcello, J.V., D. R. Hermanson & T. L. Neal. 2002. “Disclosures in Audit Committee Charters and Reports.” Accounting Horizons 16 (4): December, 291-304.

Conge (1988) The Concept of Political Participation. Toward a Definition. Comparative Politics,vol.20,No.2,pp.241- 249.

Constituency Development Act 2004

Coutinho M, (1996) “The Brazilian fiscal system in the 1990s: Equity and efficiency Under inflationary conditions ”, University of London, Institute of Latin American

Crook R.(2003),Decentralization and PovertyRreductionin Africa:The Politics of Local-Central-Relations.Public Administration and Development,Vol3,No1,pp.77-88

D. G. & H. G. Frederickson 2006, Measuring the Performance of the Hollow State, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C., p. 21

G. Kelly, G. Mulgan & S. Muers 2002, Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform, UK Cabinet

Gatobu, J. (2007). Trade Liberalisation and Poverty in Kenya, A Computable General Equilibrium Micro Simulation Analysis

Gikonyo, W. (2008). The CDF Social Audit Guide: A Handbook for Communities. Nairobi: Open Society Initiative for East Africa

Gupta, S.D. 2002. “Insurers Urged to Emphasize Corporate Governance, Transparency.” National Underwriter 106 (32): August 12, 30-31.

Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 19(2), 445-490.

L. M. Salamon 1989, Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action, Urban Institute Press, Washington, D.C., quoted in

Office, Strategy Unit, p. 3,

Public Finance Management Act 2012




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v3i4.366

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.