DETERMINANTS OF ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT IMPLEMENTATION IN COUNTY GOVERNMENTS IN KENYA

CECILIA KATHAMBI NJAGI

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to establish the determinants of e-procurement implementation in county governments in Kenya, which are forty seven in total but the study targeted ten counties. These counties comprised of the first five counties with the highest budget allocation which include Nairobi, Turkana, Mandera, Kakamega and Bungoma and five counties with the least budget allocation. These are Lamu, Isiolo, Tharaka Nithi, Elgeyo Marakwet and Taita Taveta. The general objective of the study was to investigate the determinants of electronic procurement implementation in the county governments in Kenya .The specific objectives  of this study was to investigate the role of technology in the implementation of electronic procurement in county governments in Kenya and to identify the role of organizational factors in the implementation of electronic procurement in county governments in Kenya. The study used structured questionnaire consisting of open and close ended questions which was distributed to the sample size of 146 respondents to collect data form accountants, technical team from ICT department and procurement officers in the counties mentioned. The study adopted Survey design through which both qualitative and quantitative data was collected. The study used descriptive method to analyze the data collected. For quantitative data analysis, coding and editing was done in electronic spreadsheet with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Primary data was collected using questionnaires.  Pilot test was also carried out in three Counties in the country before the actual data collection to ensure validity and reliability of the research instruments. The study revealed that organization and  technology had a great effect on e-procurement implementation. Technological factors were identified to be having the most significant effect in the e-procurement implementation in county governments. The study recommended that e-procurement to be effective and become an important part of supply chain management the county governments should adopt progressive ICT policies to ensure supportive IT infrastructure is in place. Further research should also be carried out on the role of national government in implementation of e-procurement in the devolved units.

Key Words: Technology, Organization, E-procurement Implementation, County Governments in Kenya


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aslam, U., Arfeen, M., Mohti, W., & Rahman, U. (2015). Organizational cynicism and its impact on privatization (evidence from federal government agency of Pakistan). Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(4), 401-425.

Azagra C., Mattsson, J. M., & Perruchas,F. (2011). Smoothing the lies: The distinctive effects of patent characteristics on examiner and applicant citations. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1727-1740.

Bailey, P., Farmer, D., Crocker, B., Jessop, D., & Jones, D. (2008). Procurement Principles and Management,10th edition. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Borson, F. (2017). Reforms under the World Bank Procurement and the Policy Implications for Developing Countries. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, 12(2), 146-154.

Cattaneo, G., Lifonti, R., Aguzzi, S., Bardellini, M., Sadée, C., & Tax, T. (2013). Study on e-procurement measurement and benchmarking Market 2011. Brussels, Germany: European Commission.

Chege, M. (2012). Factors Influencing Adoption of E-commerce by Kenyan Tour Operators. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Christiansen, B., Turkina, E., & Williams, N. (2013). Cultural and technological influences on global business. Hershey, Pa.: IGI Global

Croom, S. & Johnston, R. 2003. E-Service: Enhancing internal customer service through e procurement. International Journal of Service Industries Management, 14(5): 1740-1769.

EU Business in Japan. (2017). Information on Japan for EU Companies. Accessed 16 August 2017, from: http://www.eubusinessinjapan.eu

Gunasekaran, A. & Ngai, E. (2008). Adoption of E-procurement in Hong Kong; An empirical Research. International journal production economics, 33(133): 116-123.

Heijboer, G. 2003. Quantitative Analysis of Strategic and Tactical Purchasing Decisions: Electronic purchasing: Determining the optimal rollout strategy. Germany: Twente University Press.

Kaluta, I., Croft, J., Lloyd-Jones, A., & Bialy, R. (2008). 48 new books from Poland. Cracow: The Book Institute.

Kothari, C. R. (2009). Research methodology: Methods and Techniques. (2nd Ed). New Delhi: New Age International.

Laudon, M., & Romanowicz, B. (2010). Nanotechnology 2010. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press.

Management Association, I. (2017). Remote Work and Collaboration. Hershey: IGI Global.

Minyori, A. (2012). An examination of E-procurement as a source of competitive advantage for the East African Breweries Limited (EABL) [MBA Thesis].

Momanyi, E., & Nasidai, E. S. (2014). Impact of information communication technology on inventory control systems in transport organization: a case study of Kenya ferry services. European Journal of Logistics Purchasing and Supply Chain Management.2(1),17-41.

Mugenda A.G (2008) Social science research. Nairobi, Kenya: Acts Press.

Mugenda, O.M. and Mugenda, A.G. (2003): Research Methods: Quantitative & Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.

Mutuku, M., & Nzuki, D. (2015). Effects of E-Commerce on Business Profitability.Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Naidoo, L., Naidoo, V., & Ambe, M. (2017). Open Contracting: a new frontier for information disclosure in public procurement. Public And Municipal Finance, 6(1), 24-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.06(1).2017.03

Noor, I. S., Wario, G., Iravo, M. A. (2014). Factors affecting implementation of E-procurement practices in public service in Kenya: A case of Ministry of Finance. International Journal of Science and Research. 2(8), 307-310.

Odago M. O. & Mwajuma A. A. (2013). Factors affecting effective implementation of e-procurement in county governments; a case study of Kajiado County, Kenya. International Journal of Business & law Research, 1(1), 94-109.

Panayiotou, N. A., Gayialis, S. P. & Tatsiopoulos, I. P. (2007). An E-procurement system for Governmental Purchasing. International Journal Of Production Economics, 9(1), 79-102.

Pani, A., & Agrahari, A. (2007). E-procurement in emerging economies. Hershey: Idea Group Pub.

Papadopoulos, T., & Kanellis, P. (2012). Public sector reform using information technologies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

Public Procurement Oversight Authority, (2009). Trends in electronic procurement. Kenya procurement journal.4 (2) 1-2.

Pushing the frontier of e-government procurement in Africa with the open contracting standard. (2017). Governance for Development. Accessed 14 July 2017, from http://blogs.worldbank.org/governance/pushing-frontier-e-government-procurement-africa-open-contracting-standard

Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2015). Better Decision Making in Complex, Dynamic Tasks. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Rahim , M. (2008). Identifying factors affecting acceptance of e-procurement systems: An initial qualitative study at an Australian city council. International Journal Of Production Economics, 3(2),7-17.

Rwanda On-Line E-Procurement System. (2017). Umucyo.gov.rw. Accessed 16 August 2017, from http://www.umucyo.gov.rw

Sector plan for science, technology and innovation, 2008-2012. (2008). Nairobi, Kenya.

Thai, K. (2009). International handbook of public procurement. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i1.614

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.