INFLUENCE OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION PRACTICES ON SUCCESS OF GATED RESIDENTIAL HOUSING PROJECTS IN NAIROBI COUNTY, KENYA

JANIFFER NZINGU, DR. PATRICK NGUGI KARANJA (Ph.D)

Abstract


This study sought to establish the influence of monitoring and evaluation in project success of gated residential housing projects in Nairobi County, Kenya. The current study was limited to gated community projects in Nairobi County as over 75% of the gated community projects in Kenya were undertaken in Nairobi County, implying that the results of the study were more representative than the same study being carried in another part of the country. Towards realization of the objective, the research adopted a descriptive research design guided by survey. The population of the study was all the 89 gated community project contractors in Nairobi, Kenya. The research was a census and therefore all the firms participated in the research. The data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics measures that included the mean and standard deviation. To establish the relationship, a regression was generated from the primary data collected.  The finding of the study suggested that the gated community projects had put in place systems and strategies for raising monitoring budget that was separate from the main project being undertaken. Monitoring cost relates to costs incurred for consultants and physical non-contractual investments. With regard to monitoring tools, the research established that the common monitoring tools employed were logical framework matrix and input material schedule. The extent of stakeholder influence on the success of the projects was determined based on their degree of influence. It is therefore recommended contractors identify key stakeholders whose support is critical to a project success. With regard to the four variables, the research established that stakeholder evaluation and establishment of a monitoring budget had the greatest influence on the success of the gated community projects established that project success is influenced by among other the monitoring and evaluation practices adopted by a construction firm. 

Key Words: Monitoring Budgeting, Project Tools, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Evaluation


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul-Aziz, A. R. &JahnKassim, P. S. (2011) Objectives, success and failure factors of housing public-private partnerships in Malaysia, Habitat International, 35, 150–157

Aaltonen, K., (2011). Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process.International Journal Project Management, 29, 165–183

Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., 2010. A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavia Journal of Management, 26, 381–397

Ajayi, O. M., Ogunsami, O. E., Ajayi, A. K and Ofili, C.M. (2010). Factors Affecting Performance of Contractors on Construction Projects in Lagos State, Proceedings of the Construction, Building and Real estate Research Conference of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, Paris 2-3 September 2010

Atkinson R, Flint J, Blandy S, &Lister D, (2015). `Fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and time space trajectories of segregation'', paper presented at Gated Communities: Building Division or Safer, Communities?,

Bamberger,O.M&Eleanor, H (2012).Monitoring and Evaluating Urban Development Programs,A Handbook for Program Managers and Researchers, Washington, D.C, World Bank Technical Paper No 53,

Banaitienė, N., Banaitis, A. &Norkus, A. (2011). Risk management in projects: peculiarities of Lithuanian construction companies, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 15(1), 60–73.

Beringer, C., Jonas, D., & Kock, A. (2013).Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success.International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 830-846.

Dinsmore, P.C & Rocha, L (2012).Enterprise Project Governance: A Guide to the Successful Management of Projects across the Organization. Enterprise Project Governance. MACOM Books, New York

Dyason, J. R. (2010). The eye diagram: A new perspective on the project life cycle. Journal of Education for Business, 80(1), 10 – 16.

El-Razek, M.E.A. Bassoioni, H.A & Mobarak, A.M. (2014). Causes of Delay in building Construction Projects in Egypt, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134 (11), 831

Faniran, O. O., Love, P. E. D., & Smith, J., (2010). Effective Front –End Project Management – A key Element in Achieving Project Success in Developing Countries, 2nd International Conference on construction in Developing Countries: Challenges facing the construction industry in developing countries

Freeman, R. E. (1984).Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman/Ballinger.

Gudienė, N; Audrius Banaitis, A. & Banaitienė, N (2013). Evaluation of critical success factors for Construction Projects – An Empirical Study in Lithuania, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 17(1): 21–31

Hosley, E. (2013). Critical Success Factors for Key Project Players and Objectives: Case Study of Singapore. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 6-19.

IPMA. (International Project Management Association). (2006).International competency baseline, 3rd ed. Zurich, Switzerland: International Project Management Association.

Judgev, K., Thomas, J., Delisle, C.L., 2001. Rethinking project management: old truths and new insights, International Project Management Journal 7 (1), 36–43.

Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015).Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts, International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377-1392.

Kalali N. S, Ali A. P &Davod K. (2011), why does strategic plans implementation fail? A study in the health service sector of Iran, African Journal of Business Management, 5 (23), 9831-9837

Karani, F. N., Bichanga, W. O., & Kamau, C. G. (2014). Effective use of monitoring and evaluation systems in managing HIV/AIDS related projects: A case study of local NGOS in Kenya. Science Journal of Business and Management, 2(2), 67-76.

Khan, D. B. (2013).Measuring Project Success in the Construction Industry,Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 43-52

Li, T.H.Y., Ng, S.T. & Skitmore, M. (2012).Conflict or consensus: an investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process for major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong. Habitat Int.36, 333–342.

Littau, P., Jujagiri, N. J., & Adlbrecht, G. (2010). 25 years of project stakeholder theory in project management literature. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 17–29.

Lipsey, M. (2011).Multi-country co-operation around shared waters: Role of Monitoring and Evaluation. Global Environmental Change, 14(1), 5- 14

Mugambi, F & Kanda, E (2013).Determinants of effective monitoring and evaluation of strategy implementation of community based projects, International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, 2 (11), 67 - 73

Müller, R. & Judgev, K (2012). Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott — the elucidation of project success. International Journal of Management Project Business. 5 (4), 757–775.

Muzinda, M (2012). Monitoring and evaluation practices and challenges of Gaborone based local NGOs implementing HIV/AIDS projects in Botswana. Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 43-52

Nixon, P., Harrington, M. and Parker, D. (2012) Leadership performance is significant to project success or failure: a critical analysis, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(2), 204–216.

Rossi, P. H. (2012). Evaluating with sense: The Theory Driven Approach, Evaluation Review 7, 283 – 302.

Sambasivan, M. & Soon, Y.W. (2007), Causes and Effects of Delays in Malaysian Construction Industry, International Journal of Project management, 25, 5, 517- 526

Serra, C. E. M., &Kunc, M. (2015).Benefits realisation management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 53-66.

Sethi, R., & Philippines, R. (2012). The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project, European Management Journal, 25(4), 298-309.

Uitto, J. A. (2010). Multi-country co-operation around shared waters: Role of Monitoring and Evaluation. Global Environmental Change, 14(1): 5 – 14

Vaagaasar, A. L. (2011).Development of relationships and relationship competencies in complex projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(2), 294–307

Vaskimo, J., (2014). Project management methodologies: an invitation for research. IPMA World Congress 2013 on October 12, 2013 in Brisbane, Queensland. International Project Management Association, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Wells, H., (2014). How effective are project management methodologies: an explorative evaluation of their benefits in practice. Proj.Manag. J. 43 (6), 43–58.

World Bank (2017). Kenya Needs 2 Million More Low-income Homes: Building Them Would Boost Its Economic Growth, Kenya’s’ Economic Outlook,

World Population Review (2018). Nairobi Population 2018; http://http://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/nairobi-population/, accessed15.05.2018

Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2010).Business research methods. 9th edition, Cengage Learning




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i4.959

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.