ROLE OF DEFENSIVE AND SWING STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ON OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF SMALLHOLDER TEA SECTOR IN KENYA

JAMES NJOROGE KARIUKI, DR. WARIO GUYO (Ph.D), PROF. ROMANUS ODHIAMBO (Ph.D)

Abstract


This study sought to evaluate the role of defensive and swing stakeholder management strategies on operational performance of smallholder tea sector in Kenya. It was established that exclusive use of either defensive or swing strategy had a positive and significant relationship with performance of smallholder tea sector in Kenya. It was also established that stakeholder management strategies collectively had no significant influence on the performance of smallholder tea sector in Kenya. However, the study results established that stakeholder engagement had a strong moderating effect on the relationship between stakeholder management strategies and performance of smallholder tea sector in Kenya. Stakeholder management strategies enhanced performance of smallholder tea sector in Kenya in terms of sales volume and quality of tea. Contribution of the current study would include the addition to knowledge of strategic management. The exploration of the linkage between stakeholder management strategies and performance of smallholder tea sector in Kenya particularly in developing countries which provides not only significant contribution to the strategic management literature but also enables managers to employ the right stakeholder management strategies for their firms to compete in the fast changing environment. Another major contribution is underlying assumption of Stakeholder Theory as used in this study is that stakeholder management strategies of defensive and swing and stakeholder engagement strategies influence performance of smallholder tea sector when used exclusively and for firms to achieve performance they must choose either of these strategies. The study recommended that policy managers of these firms pay careful consideration to aligning their stakeholder management strategies and in consideration with the stakeholder engagement as one of the environmental variables so as to enhance performance in this ever changing global business world.

 

Key Words: Defensive Strategies, swing strategies, stakeholder management 

 

CITATION: Kariuki, J. N., Wario, G., & Odhiambo, R. (2018). Role of defensive and swing stakeholder management strategies on operational performance of smallholder tea sector in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 5(4), 1921-1931.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackermann, C., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic Management of stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Long Range Planning, 44.

AFA Tea Directorate. (2017). Retrieved July 6, 2017, from http://teaboard.or.ke/

Afram, R. (2011). Financial factors affecting profitability and employment growth: the case of Greek Manufacturing. International Journal Financial Services Management, 1(2), 232-242.

Africa Investor. (2010). Kenya Tea Facories blame falling supplies on hawking. Retrieved May 2, 2017, from http:/www.africainvestor.com/article.asp?id=7209

Baden, D. (2010). CSR: An opportunity for SMEs. In C. Louche, S. O. Idowu, & W. L. Filho, Innovative CSR: From risk management to value creation (pp. 84-101). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Ltd.

Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2011). Ethics and stakeholder management. Business and society. Thomson Southern-Western.

Chakraborty, D. (2009). Research Methodology (1 ed.). New Delhi: Saurabh Publishing House.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (2011). “The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications.”. Academy of Management Review, 20, pp. 65-91.

Friedman, L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholder Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibilty Theories: Mapping the Terrotory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51-71.

Gocejna, M. M. (2016). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility And Corporate Financial Performance – Evidence From Empirical Studies. Comparative Economic Research, 19(4), 68-84.

Herly, M., & Sisnuhadi. (2011). Corporate governance and firm performance in Indonesia. International Journal of Governance, 1(1), 1-20.

Kathata, P. M. (2011). Factors which affect the quality of made tea in factories managed by Kenya Tea Development Agency (KTDA): a study of factories in Thika district. Thesis, Nairobi.

Kegonde, P. (2005). Economic Governance of the Tea Sector, A paper presented to CGD.

Keraro, V., Mokamba, J., Cheluget, J., Kithitu, J., & Mbogo, P. (2012, November 13). Strategies for enhancing effective management of tea factories in a liberalized smallholder tea subsector in Kenya. Prime Journal of Business Administration and Management (BAM), 2(11), 736-745.

KTDA. (2014). Company Profile and Governance Structure. Nairobi: Kenya Tea Development Agency.

Lukviarman, N. (2010). Performance measurement: A stakeholder approach. Sinergi.

Ministry of Agiculture Livestock and Fisheries. (2015). Economic Review of Agriculture (ERA). Nairobi: Central Planning and Project Monitoring Unit.

Minyu, W. (2012, August). Managing Stakeholders: An Integrative Perspective on the Source of Competitive Advantage. Retrieved August 2, 2017, from www.ccsenet.org/ass: URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n10p160

Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Do stakeholder strategy and salience influence corporate social responsibility in Indian companies? Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 306-327.

Mwaura, F., & Muku, O. (2007). Tea Farming Enterprise Contribution to Smallhoder's Well Being in Kenya. AAAE Conference Proceedings, (pp. 307-313).

Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder Engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39-49.

Nyangito, H., & Kimura, J. (2009). Provision of Agricultural Servives in a Liberalized Economy. Nairobi: Kenya Institute of Policy Analysis and Research.

PMI. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. (5th Ed). Newtown Square, PA.

Polonsky, M. J., & Scott, D. (2009). An empirical examination of the stakeholder strategy matrix. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 1199-1215.

Simbua, E., & Loconto, A. (2010). Sustainability of Smallholder Tea Production in the United Republic of Tanzania. In Proceedings of Commodity Problems Intergovernmental Group on Tea Nineteenth Session, (pp. 12-14). New Delhi, India.

Šmakalova, P. (2012). Generic Stakeholder Strategy. Economic Management Journal, 17(4), 2661-2667.

Smith, N. C., Ansett, S., & Erez, L. (2011). How Gap Inc. engaged with its stakeholders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(4), pp. 69-76.

Spark, J. (2016, September 26). Offensive and Defensive Strategies for Industry Leadership. Retrieved August 2, 2017, from My Venture Pad: http://myventurepad.com/offensive-defensive-strategies-industry-leadership/

TRF. (2011). Tea Research Foundation 2010-2015 Strategic Plan. TRF.

Ventsislava, N., & Sanela, A. (2017). The stakeholder approach in corporate social responsibility. Engineering management, 3(1), 24-35.

Wouter, V. D., Geert, B., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector (Second ed.). (S. P. Osborne, Ed.) New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Yannopoulous, P. (2011). Defensive and Offensive Strategies for Market Success. International Journal of Social Science, 13(2), 1-12.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i4.998

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.